The author questioned whether people could become dependent on AI as it increasingly empowered them, and asked whether AI was making humans or routines obsolete.
Gerd Leonhard
Mentions and quotes
German futurist and writer
@gleonhard
· 44,936 Followers
1 Followers
The author argued that incidents involving AI agents stemmed from a mismatch between agents’ goals and human intentions, which they said resulted from how the agents were trained. They also shared a link titled “The dangerous myth behind AI agent hacks.”
The author wrote that the observation challenged the belief that greater AI capability would resolve misalignment, arguing that past evidence and theoretical reasoning suggested it could instead intensify unwanted behaviour by making systems more effective at pursuing the wrong goals.
The author shared a link, via Yoshua Bengio, to an article titled “The dangerous myth behind AI agent hacks” and urged readers to read it, adding the hashtag #aiemergency.
The author shared a link to “How A.I. Agents Are Going to Transform Our Lives” from Hard Fork and praised a show by Max Read, also mentioning Hard Fork and the BBC.
The author shared a link titled “Muse Creates Detailed Profiles of All Your Friends and Family” and warned that giving Muse all of one’s data would put digital security at risk, beyond concerns about privacy. They urged people not to do so.
The author praised Albhy Galuten and shared his argument that AI homogenisation could threaten the sources of genuinely new answers, rather than simply make future answers resemble those of today.
The author recommended a Bruce Schneier video as essential viewing on the future of AI, hacking and related topics.
The author shared an Axios article about a grassroots rebellion in the AI industry and described it as “the human resistance,” using the hashtag #aiemergency.
The author shared a link to a podcast about AI and humanity over the next five years, presenting human-centric AI as key and referring to Gerd Leonhard in Yerevan. #aiemergency #AI #HumanCentricAI #TechPodcast #AM
The author praised Albhy Galuten’s Royal Society of Arts article, “The AI Diversity Deficit,” describing it as a strong piece on AI and humanity.
The author argued that AI agents posed risks because they could not reflect on their own actions, and shared a NOEMA article titled “The AIs Are Not Going Rogue.”
The author questioned whether error-prone AI had nearly sparked a third world war and mentioned Timnit Gebru and Emily Bender. They wrote that a loss of control might begin not with a machine taking power, but with people gradually deferring their judgment to a system that sounded certain.
The post’s author shared a link to a conversation with Bill Halal, author of *One World*, describing it as a great chat about AI, moving beyond knowledge and global consciousness. They urged followers to watch it.
The author described a conversation with Bill Halal about AI and human consciousness as worth watching and shared a link titled “AI Is Getting Smarter. Is Humanity Getting Wiser? | Gerd Leonhard.”
The author argued that an AI sovereign wealth fund would not be progressive, describing it as “techno-imperialism.” In a post linking to the Financial Times, they said AI infrastructure used land and water and put pressure on electricity grids abroad, while income was generated at home.
The author argued that an AI sovereign wealth fund would not be progressive, describing it as “techno-imperialism.” They said critics including Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon were right to warn that AI breeds oligarchy, but objected to funding a dividend by projecting American power while leaving “the rest of the” something unspecified. #AI #TechEthics #Oligarchy #US
The author wrote that a Trump AI deal would rebrand artificial intelligence as “superintelligence” and questioned whether a morally binding self-regulation agreement among the world’s top seven companies would work. They likened the arrangement to Oppenheimer starting a company to sell nuclear weapons.
The post recommended a Financial Times article about how AI was changing jobs, calling it a very good read. It also included the hashtags #aiemergency and #hellven.
The author linked to a report about Anthropic warning of existential risks from AI in an IPO document, and argued that AI IPOs should be boycotted until companies seriously addressed the risks. They described the situation as an aberration of extreme capitalism and said they were not a “doomer”.
