Search

Albina Perri, the director, contested Garofano's statement that the negative data would have the eyewitness testimony of Capra, dismissing it with a contemptuous tone. She compared it to saying that she called Sempio to ask him if he had "the Frau." #politica #notizie #commento (translated)

Anne echoed Gallo's words, according to which it would not have been mistakes, but deliberate actions, and Capra should have been heard in the prosecutor's office as soon as possible in light of what he had said. In the post, Anne added a goat emoji and a laughing face next to the reference to Capra. #IgnotoX #garlasco https://t.co/QQB2t2SnjZ #garlasco #giustizia #notizie (translated)

Andrea Tosatto criticized Capra for insulting Massimo Giletti and treating others as ignorant, arguing that such an attitude did not strengthen the arguments but made them more arrogant. Tosatto reported that Capra considered negative tests irrelevant and claimed that a flat line did not necessarily demonstrate the absence of DNA. While acknowledging that such a trace did not automatically exclude the presence of DNA, Tosatto said that a negative result could not be dismissed as irrelevant for that reason. According to Tosatto, conflicting results would require checks on the correspondence of samples and analysis conditions, the reproducibility of the positive result, and the methods used to obtain it. He also questioned whether the sample had always been collected by the same person and hypothesized that the mysterious "Port" might have swapped the analyzed items. For this reason, he deemed Giletti's questions legitimate and stated that a negative result did not automatically render the positive result unassailable. Tosatto added that technical expertise did not authorize humiliating others and that, in his opinion, Capra had made a poor impression in front of millions of Italians. He also said that if he were Bossetti, he would have cried watching him on television. Regarding the Garlasco case, he argued that conclusions should be proven with verifiable documents, procedures, and explanations, and stated that Chiara Poggi deserved the truth. Finally, he challenged what he described as the presentation of a signature placed under the wording "seen everything" as if it were a signature on a complete document. #Giletti #Garlasco #Capra #Scienza #Verità #Rispetto (translated)

The Cinghio has reiterated what he called legitimate questions about Capra, referring to a question posed by Civardi to Marino: why were Capra and Tizzoni received on the 18th to show them results that, according to the question, were not yet available. He added that that note contained much, perhaps everything. #Garlasco #Garlasco #Capra #Politica (translated)

Beautiful wrote that lawyer Taccia, commenting on the insult directed by Capra at Giletti, had said that everyone was stressed during that period and that, in the context of defenses, sometimes people went out of line. The author added that she had never seen Bocellari and De Rensis behave like Taccia and Capra. #garlasco #commento #giustizia #attualità (translated)

ADA compared Pavel Georgescu to Popovici and claimed that the press did not talk about Georgescu because he was the son of President Călin Georgescu. She said that the sovereignist press would promote his achievements. ADA stated that Pavel Georgescu and Alexandru Căpraru, athletes of the EuroSwimming Club, had won the title of European champions at the European Biathlon, Triathlon, and Laser Run Championships held in Madeira, Portugal. According to her, the two had obtained two gold medals for Romania. #PavelGeorgescu #EuroSwimmingClub #CampioniEuropeni (translated)

Luca Azzola reported a comment attributed to Milo, who had said to wait for the hearing of Dr. Capra. According to Milo, Capra would have stated that he had been informed about the elements that emerged; having said and repeated it already, he would have wanted to hear his firm conviction. #ore11 #garlasco https://t.co/3rHI1YX9DC #giustizia #verità #ascolto (translated)

Allegra Rei praised Massimo Giletti and Cametti for contesting, in her opinion, the service by Rosanna Santoro and Capra on Rai Porta a Porta regarding the analyses of the RIS. She wrote that Cametti had raised the issue live and that Giletti had done so the day before on Lo Stato delle Cose, in reference to the Garlasco case. #LoStatoDelleCose #Garlasco https://t.co/1ze6LcrB2Q #Rai #Giletti #Attualità (translated)

Luca Azzola reported Fabbri's words, who said he was astonished by Capra's statement that they were also aware of the data. Fabbri had contested the hypothesis that they had forgotten it, remaining silent about what he considered the most important evidence for Alberto, and that they had allowed him to end up in prison. He described such a reconstruction as illogical. #mattino5 #garlasco https://t.co/L2KHYnbWCE #giustizia #verità #fatti (translated)

Mattino5 reported that Capra had accused Fabbri of having all the results related to the pedals. The broadcaster also reported the statement of Matteo Fabbri, Stasi's consultant, indicating that they were not aware of the analyses. #Mattino5 https://t.co/Z1zODTE9IU #Garlasco #Fabbri #Mattino5 (translated)

Carmelo Schininà had issued a statement signed by Alberto Stasi's consultants, Professor Francesco Maria Avato and Dr. Matteo Fabbri, disputing what was stated by the consultant of the Poggi family, Marzio Capra, during the episode of Quarto Grado on October 2, 2026. Capra had said that on September 24, 2007, Stasi's consultants were informed by the Ris of two negative results obtained from the pedal sample. Avato and Fabbri had called this reconstruction false and stated that they had never known, neither then nor during the trial, that the sample had produced negative results. They added that they had learned of it only recently, in light of new developments. The two consultants had observed that those results were not found in the file, in the trial documents or in the expert opinions, nor had they been transmitted to the experts appointed by Judge Vitelli in 2009. In support of their version, they had recalled what Professor Angelo Giarda stated at the validation hearing on September 27, 2007: according to the reconstruction reported in the note, Stasi's consultants were only aware of two traces, one from Chiara Poggi used for comparison and one positive related to the pedal, obtained on September 19, 2007. Avato and Fabbri had stated that Capra's words cast doubt on their work and that they would protect their rights in the competent venues. They also announced that they would request the Prosecutor's Office of Pavia to be heard as persons informed about the facts. #giustizia #verità #giuridico (translated)

Elisabetta Sionis, clinical criminologist, commented with the phrase "Mala tempora currunt" and wrote that Professors Avato and Fabbri would soon issue a press release regarding Capra's public statements about them. https://t.co/ugISWLhBIN #Garlasco #Notizie #Attualità (translated)

Luca Azzola wrote that Avato and Fabbri would have taken initiatives against Capra for his statements from the previous day and would have asked the Pavia Prosecutor's Office to be heard on the case of the pedals. #garlasco https://t.co/VukJGXp1FB #giustizia #fatti #Pavia (translated)

Monima_Veg wrote that he does not know if Dr. Capra was fully aware of attributing serious professional negligence to Prof. Avato and Prof. Fabbri. He added that, in his opinion, the two professors would have been more credible if they had relied on the null data, rather than on considerations regarding the nature of the evidence. #Garlasco #giustizia #negligenza (translated)

So, just by instinct, I would say that Dr. Muscio, Professor Avato, Professor Fabbri, and Dr. Capra could be heard on site. Bonus track: Professor Robino. This way we might see if, as claimed by several voices in recent hours, the whole world was aware of these results except for the judges of the Stasi trial. #Giustizia #Processo #Garlasco (translated)