Search

Szymon Hołownia is considering running for the position of ambassador of the Republic of Poland to the Holy See, which could be beneficial for Donald Tusk, but his nomination requires the approval of President Karol Nawrocki and compliance with conservative values before the departure. #SzymonHołownia #Polska2050 #Watykan (translated)

Aleksander Twardowski wrote that MP Kamil Wnuk responded to his question about renting a car, but the amounts and facts provided by him differed from the information from the Chancellery of the Sejm. Twardowski informed that yesterday he requested the Chancellery to audit the contracts of the MP. He added that if it turns out that Wnuk settled a higher amount than he actually spent, he would notify the prosecutor's office. The Chancellery had previously conducted a similar audit regarding Adam Gomoła. Twardowski also wrote that Poland 2050 informed him via email that it would not disclose the contract register with complete data of the parties. He declared that upon receiving a written refusal with justification, he would take the matter to court. He accused Katarzyna Pełczyńska and Szymon Hołownia of not wanting to reveal how public money is spent and described such actions as a violation of the law. He also informed that the day before yesterday he submitted a request to the Left for the disclosure of the full, non-anonymized register of contracts concluded since the beginning of the term. He expected a refusal and announced that he would promptly appeal it to the court. Finally, he recommended the Citizens' Network and encouraged financial support for it. #FinansePubliczne #Jawność #Prawo (translated)

The author accused Marcin Przydacz of inconsistency in his statements about who decided on Donald Tusk's assumption of the office of Prime Minister. He wrote that after Mateusz Morawiecki's government failed to secure a vote of confidence, the Sejm elected Tusk in a constitutional parliamentary procedure, and Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz and Szymon Hołownia had no power to transfer to him. The author stated that by Przydacz's logic, one could argue that Hołownia also decided on the assumption of office by Karol Nawrocki because he convened the National Assembly and enabled the swearing-in. However, he pointed out that in Nawrocki's case, he saw a constitutional problem related to the validity of the elections, the handling of protests, the determination of the validity of the election, and the swearing-in despite objections. He assessed that Hołownia's decision had constitutional significance in this matter. The author also rejected the accusation that Kosiniak-Kamysz prioritized party interests over state interests, claiming that Przydacz equated the interests of the state with preventing Tusk from coming to power. #Polityka #Konstytucja #Debata (translated)

The author of the entry agreed with Fogiel that Poles should choose their authorities, but called for the consistent application of this principle. He pointed to the presidential elections of 2025 and questioned the method of constitutional verification of their results. He recalled that Article 129 of the Constitution, as he wrote, guarantees voters the right to submit protests, and the election oversight should be conducted in a procedure that meets constitutional standards. He stated that 55,274 protests had been submitted to the Supreme Court. He also claimed that the National Electoral Commission indicated the need to address the protests and to determine the validity of the election by a Supreme Court panel whose institutional and personal status would not raise doubts. According to the author, the Electoral Commission recorded recurring errors in the protocols of some polling stations and called for a more thorough analysis of their causes. The author emphasized that the validity of the election was determined by the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, whose status as a court established by law—as he noted—remained a subject of dispute. He added that proceedings regarding irregularities in vote counting were still ongoing. He mentioned cases of incorrect assignment of votes to candidates, allegations against commission members, and acts of accusation. He stated that in one of the cases, the prosecutor accused 24 commission members of dishonestly counting votes and preparing protocols. He noted that he did not claim that a change in the overall election result had been proven. As he wrote, the prosecutor is examining individual commissions separately, which allows establishing what happened in a specific commission but does not determine the overall scale of irregularities in the country. According to the author, it cannot be assumed that the errors confirmed in successive commissions could not be significant in a cumulative sense until their scale has been established. The author considered that the mere assertion that Poles elected a president does not end the discussion about the integrity of the elections. He asked whether all votes were counted correctly, whether the protests were addressed in accordance with constitutional requirements, and whether the body stating the validity of the election met the Supreme Court's standard required by Article 129. He also wrote that Speaker Szymon Hołownia was aware of these doubts, yet convened the National Assembly, allowing the office to be assumed. He emphasized, however, that he could not say that politicians chose a president instead of citizens, because it was Poles who voted. #wybory #Polska #konstytucja (translated)

Agnieszka Gozdyra reported that Colonel Krzysztof Przepiórka on #debatagozdyry on Polsat News accused a certain person of pretending to be uninformed, referred to her as a "slippery figure," and said that she had previously managed this with Szymon Hołownia, and was now trying it with Kosiniak-Kamysz. https://t.co/xlhS8Jn2cO #debata #polityka #SzymonHołownia (translated)

The President wrote that Adam Bielan pretended not to know what was going on during a conversation with Agnieszka Gozdyra. She recalled the assessment of Colonel Przepiórka, who described Bielan as a slippery and repulsive person. She added that the same method had previously worked in the case of Hołownia and was now being used against Kosiniak-Kamysz. https://t.co/0kXyT9AuvX #Polityka #Krytyka #Debata (translated)

Ally asked if anyone still had doubts about Adam Bielan and his nighttime guests, mentioning Hołownia and Kamiński. She inquired about what had happened then and whether the audience had understood it. She also asked when Bielan and the people she referred to as his mafia would be imprisoned. #Bielan #polityka #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Przemo75 wrote that politicians mistakenly assumed that vetoing and blocking actions, as well as actually paralyzing the government's work, would meet with applause and translate into a rise in ratings. He compared this situation to that of Hołownia, who — as he assessed — initially gained great popularity and broke its records, but over time lost voters' interest. #polityka #rząd #społeczeństwo (translated)

Można się naśmiewać z Hołowni, ale tu powiedział coś bardzo ważnego. "Europejscy przywódcy wiedzą i doceniają, że to od Nawrockiego Trump odbiera telefon. I z tego co wiem, to europejscy przywódcy dzwonią do Nawrockiego by coś załatwił u Trumpa" To dlatego Tusk się wścieka https://t.co/gq5FaCOgEj #Hołownia #Trump #Polityka

Pani Minister @Kpelczynska przyjechała na spotkanie PL2050 w Starej Giełdzie we Wrocławiu (plac Solny), ale ponieważ musi mieć limuzynę 1 metr od drzwi, trzeba było dla niej rozmontować słupki blokujące wjazd na chodnik. Nie może być przecież, aby Pani Minister szła na nóżkach 50 metrów, bo w takiej odległości są akurat wolne miejsca. Ja zaparkowałem bez problemu. Niesamowite jest to poczucie własnej wyjątkowości. Byłem w Starej Giełdzie na dziesiątkach spotkań, bywali tu politycy większego kalibru niż Pełczyńska - Schetyna, gdy był premierem, różni ministrowie sprawiedliwości, marszałek (nie Hołownia). Prezydenci Wrocławia. Nigdy nikomu nie rozbierano blokad chodnikowych. Do dzisiaj. #Polityka #Wrocław #Spotkanie

Pamiętacie? W kampanii 2023 Hołownia mówił: Nie chcemy zemsty, ale chcemy rozliczyć PiS. Kilka miesięcy później pytał: Być może powinni pójść siedzieć, ale czy od tego nam będzie lepiej? Otóż tak. Będzie nam lepiej. Bo w państwie, w którym politycy wiedzą, że za złodziejstwo, nadużycia i bezkarność naprawdę się odpowiada, wszystkim uczciwym ludziom żyje się lepiej. #polityka #Polska #Hołownia