Search

Piotr Kusznieruk described the court's decision to deny the arrest of Piotr after the protest as a disgrace for the prosecution. He stated that, in his opinion, the lack of high probability of committing a crime meant that the prosecution had not demonstrated the basic premise for applying the arrest. He claimed that Piotr had spent over 50 hours deprived of freedom, and the police conducted a brutal intervention and a request for arrest was submitted without convincing evidence. He noted that the denial of arrest does not mean acquittal, but he considered it a serious signal for the prosecution. He called for the accountability of the police officers and their superiors. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that the court could not impose temporary detention on Piotr because — as he claimed — there was no physical assault on the police officers. He added that if such an assault had occurred, Piotr would not have avoided detention. Hübner stated that the court's decision confirmed his earlier accusation that Tusk's government, his media, and Kierwiński's police were lying. #sąd #polityka #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Jarosław Kaczyński wrote that he opposed lawlessness and called for monitoring the actions of the authorities. He stated that thanks to the interventions of his environment, lies, violence, and violations of rules during the detention of Mr. Piotr last Friday were revealed. According to Kaczyński, the court did not consider the prosecutor Żurek's request for temporary arrest, and the detainee was treated criminally by Donald Tusk's people and was the main victim in this case. He added that every significant victory begins with the first step. #Polska #sprawiedliwość #wolność (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk informed that the court refused to temporarily arrest Piotr W., and after more than 50 hours of detention, the man was supposed to return home. He described that Piotr W. was standing at a red light at a pedestrian crossing, after which the police were said to have chased him, subdued him, and pinned him to the floor. According to the account referenced by Kusznieruk, the man lost consciousness and was taken to the hospital in handcuffs. The author noted that — as he wrote — the specific basis for the initiation of the identification has not been publicly clarified to this day. He added that the prosecution requested a temporary arrest, and the court did not agree to this request. Kusznieruk assessed that arrest should be a last resort and called for an investigation into the basis for the intervention, the use of force by the officers, and the circumstances surrounding Piotr W.'s loss of consciousness. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

The author wrote that the court did not agree to arrest Piotr W., who — as she stated — was beaten by the police. She described the arrest as absurd and attributed the decision to the work of the lawyers and the support of Poles. She added that the pressure makes sense. #Sprawiedliwość #Polska #PrawaCzłowieka (translated)

Bartosz Lewandowski called the situation a disgrace for the National Prosecutor's Office. He wrote that the lack of a high probability of committing an offense meant that the court had already at this stage determined that the crime had not been demonstrated even to a degree justifying the application of preventive measures. #Polska #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska informed that the court did not grant the prosecutor's motion for the temporary detention of Piotr W. and agreed with the defense's position. She wrote that the man returned home after more than 50 hours. The author described that on Friday morning on Marszałkowska Street in Warsaw, Piotr W. was waiting for a green light at the pedestrian crossing, after which he was subdued by police officers. According to her account, he lost consciousness and was transported by ambulance on a stretcher, always in handcuffs, even during transport and while at the emergency room. Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that the prosecutor demanded the application of temporary detention, and she, Magda Majkowska, and Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris argued in court that there were no grounds for depriving Piotr W. of his freedom before the verdict. She added that the court agreed with them. She thanked the MPs who — as she wrote — supported Piotr W. from the very first hours, as well as journalists for showing the full recording. Among the people and editorial offices mentioned were Dorota Arciszewska, Marek Jakubiak, Telewizja Republika, wPolsce.pl, and Polsat News. #sprawiedliwość #Polska #prawo (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that the court did not grant the prosecution's request for a month of temporary detention for Piotr. According to Malewski, the prosecutor justified the request with concerns that Piotr might hide and an assessment that there is a high probability of him committing further crimes. Malewski wrote that together with lawyers Magda Prządka and Magda Majkowska, he convinced the court that there were no grounds for imposing detention. He claimed that it was not sufficiently substantiated that Piotr had committed the alleged acts and that Friday's events should be treated as an incident requiring thorough explanation. According to Malewski, Piotr has a permanent place of residence, is socially engaged, and is a firefighter in the volunteer fire department, so there is no real risk that he would hide. He added that after the defenders reached him, Piotr, feeling safer, started limited cooperation with the authorities. Malewski also emphasized that the lack of cooperation is Piotr's right and should not be a basis for preventive measures. Malewski also assessed that the forecast for further criminal activity had no rational basis. He wrote that Piotr had not been convicted and that his behavior on Friday was not aimed at committing the alleged acts, which, in Malewski's view, undermined the legal qualification adopted by the prosecution. He informed that the court did not apply other preventive measures, such as police supervision, and that Piotr would respond to the charges at liberty. He added that assistance was provided as part of a procedural intervention by Ordo Iuris. #wolność #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Waldemar wrote about Piotr Wichert, whom he described as an activist and delegate of PiS, as well as an acquaintance from Arciszewska's district. He described the right-wing narrative, according to which Wichert was severely beaten by the police. As he pointed out, he was allegedly fleeing from being identified, pushed away an officer, who hit her head against a glass door, and had a knife with him. Waldemar added that recordings from body cameras were presented as a manipulation by Donald Tusk's government. The author wrote that Jarosław Kaczyński intervened at the police station, media in the Republic declared Wichert a victim, and representatives of PiS considered the matter persecution. He also criticized what he described as the leniency of the justice system towards politicians from that party. The post ended with the signature of Jacek Fogiel. #Polska #PiS #Sprawiedliwość (translated)

The change in the political affiliation of the mayor of Izmir, regarded as a stronghold of the Turkish opposition, in favor of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) is a significant symbol of Erdogan's success, part of a broader crisis of the opposition in Turkey. #Izmir #Erdogan #opozycja (translated)

Brother Pete wrote that it was the 223rd day of his reminding that Paweł Kozanecki killed two women. He claimed that the only punishment Kozanecki would face would be 1.5 years of imprisonment, and he described the ruling of Judge Karol Radaszkiewicz as absurd. https://t.co/Y7MJDYlh9s #Sprawiedliwość #Prawo #Kryminalistyka (translated)

Jack Strong wrote that according to his source in the prosecutor's office, the collected evidence did not justify the arrest of Piotr and the man was to be released. He claimed that pressure was being exerted from above to file a motion for arrest, and he called on Minister Żurek to disclose who called the prosecutor. He added that messengers would not help in this matter, and he tagged the National Prosecutor's Office. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

The author claimed that the man who attacked police officers with a knife was a party activist and PiS delegate Piotr Wichert. He asked Dorota Arciszewska when — in his opinion — the leniency of the justice system towards people associated with PiS, whom he described using an offensive term suggesting criminality, would end. https://t.co/Y45KnUXfkZ #Polska #Prawo #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the entry r00t wrote that the document commented on by Wójcik contradicted his assertion that Maciej Berek did not meet the formal requirements. According to the author, the Chancellery of the Sejm indicated that the application with Berek's candidacy was submitted on time by an eligible entity and contained the required elements, after which it was referred to the Justice and Human Rights Committee. The author added that during the committee meeting, Berek's performance of the legal advisor profession was discussed, and the candidate answered questions. The committee positively assessed his candidacy. r00t accused Wójcik of ignoring the course of the procedure and the documents, which — as he wrote — indicated something contrary to his assertion. #Polska #Prawo #KomisjaSprawiedliwości (translated)

The Ordo Iuris Institute wrote that the refusal to provide an explanation by the suspect should not be a basis for temporary detention. Attorney Magda Majkowska from Ordo Iuris, Piotr's defender, said that this is his right and that the prosecution cannot justify detention based on it. She added that she has never encountered a case where the mere refusal led to detention. In her opinion, this could mean using detention to force the suspect to provide an explanation in order to regain his freedom. The Institute defined the right to remain silent as a fundamental procedural guarantee and stated that exercising it should not be associated with negative consequences. #Prawo #Sprawiedliwość #Obrona (translated)

Artur Bartkiewicz warns that the escalation of the dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal by Law and Justice can only bring losses, and the Civic Coalition does not intend to withdraw in the face of voter mobilization by Jarosław Kaczyński. #PiS #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #KoalicjaObywatelska (translated)