Search

Patryk Słowik wrote to Dorota that he and Wirtualna Polska won a court case against Zbigniew Ziobro regarding his text in which—he reported—he revealed Ziobro's manipulation of court statistics. He accused her of receiving money from TVP during Jacek Kurski's time until her dismissal. He added that when some people left on their own in 2015 and 2016, she hoped she would not be dismissed, but that happened. Słowik wrote that he understood that she might have shown even greater reluctance later to divert attention from the fact that the courage attributed to her did not, in his opinion, correspond to reality. #Polska #PiS #media (translated)

Anna Magdalena, addressing Zbigniew Ziobro, used an offensive term against him and wrote that his escape also burdens his own camp. She claimed that he was not only avoiding arrest but also the verification of medical documentation. She reminded that despite describing his condition as "terminal," he quickly arrived in Jeruzal when the Internal Security Agency was searching his house. #polityka #debatapubliczna #weryfikacja (translated)

"Tusk, you're lying again! Your henchman used the police to provocatively invade the organizers' office of the protests in front of the Constitutional Tribunal. You caused a volunteer to lose consciousness by unjustly ordering the police to use violence against him. Then it turned out that he had a small knife with him, which he used the day before to cut strings for posters at the protest. The assaulted man did not threaten anyone with it nor reached for it. But as is typical of UB methods, you insisted that the knife found post factum justified the conducted provocation," Ziobro stated. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #DonaldTusk #polityka (translated)

Zbigniew Ziobro accused Donald Tusk of responsibility for the provocation at the Constitutional Tribunal, which led to police intervention and the loss of consciousness of a demonstrator, emphasizing that Tusk is trying to intimidate society ahead of the upcoming protests. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #DonaldTusk #polityka (translated)

Włodzimierz Czarzasty wrote that Maciej Berek received an appointment as a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal and took an oath before the President. He stated that Braun, Matecki, Bąkiewicz, Gosek, the President, and Ziobro will no longer govern the Tribunal, and he assessed that this stage has come to an end. https://t.co/CPNYbc0H4W #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #sędzia #polityka (translated)

Bartosz Lewandowski alleged that in the Court of Appeal in Warsaw, an appeal regarding a "iron-clad" letter for Marcin Romanowski was directed for consideration, bypassing 12 judges from the complaint application section. He claimed that after the change of power, Adam Bodnar led to changes in the court's leadership, and 12 judges were removed from ruling on other cases, including those concerning operational surveillance and temporary arrests. According to Lewandowski, the section was appropriate for reviewing appeals regarding iron-clad letters. He referred to a previous appeal regarding the refusal to issue an iron-clad letter for Michał Kuczmierowski, which was reviewed by the judges of that section. In Lewandowski's assessment, the prosecutor's appeal in the Romanowski case was wrongly classified as concerning arrest. He indicated that the case in the District Court was registered as concerning an iron-clad letter, and the decision on arrest was meant to be merely a consequence of its granting. He added that he appealed the decision in favor of Romanowski, and his appeal was instructed to be sent to the appellate court on October 2, 2026, a few days before the prosecutor's appeal. Lewandowski called the situation a scandal and announced that he would request explanations from the management of the appellate court. He also informed that he would notify the First President of the Supreme Court Zbigniew Kapiński about the matter and the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor of the U.S. Department of State. He announced that he would bring up comments made by Minister Waldemar Żurek about Judge Konrad Mielcarek and the case of Judge Dariusz Łubowski after the European arrest warrant against Romanowski was revoked. He pointed out that he intended to do this in connection with the extradition request concerning Zbigniew Ziobro in the same matter. #SądApelacyjny #Sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

Only I know that they want to deprive me of the right to defend the truth, to show what it looks like - Only I know that they want to deprive me of the right to defend the truth, to show what it looks like - Zbigniew Ziobro thundered at that time. #TrybunałStanu #ZbigniewZiobro #AdamGlapiński (translated)

Lawyers for Poland criticized Marcin Kierwiński's statement, noting that the police identified and arrested the author of the recording concerning the knife attacker from Przasnysz, despite President Karol Nawrocki vetoing the law which — as indicated by Kierwiński's statement — was supposed to be the basis for such actions. The organization called this argumentation convoluted. The authors also wrote that Donald Tusk, Barbara Nowacka, Waldemar Żurek, and Kierwiński had known about the ABW report on the radicalization of youth and the increase in violent behavior six months earlier. In their opinion, the safety of Poles was secondary to issues such as "neo-judges," planetary diet, pursuing Marcin Romanowski and Zbigniew Ziobro, as well as actions aimed at Nawrocki. #Polska #bezpieczeństwo #przemoc (translated)

Piotr Stanisław Wielgucki wrote that the ABW had been alerting Donald Tusk, Marcin Kierwiński, and Tomasz Siemoniak for many months about a group of young people who were dangerously organizing themselves online. He claimed that Tusk ignored these warnings, considering the matters of Zonda, Marcin Romanowski, and Zbigniew Ziobro, fuel prices, and the threat of war to be more effective propaganda tools. Wielgucki wrote that after the bomb exploded, chaos reigned again, and Tusk tried in panic to shift the blame onto Karol Nawrocki. He accused him that this attempt would be unsuccessful and described his actions as desperate and predatory. #polityka #wiadomości #ABW (translated)

Marcelina Zawisza from the Left Party wrote that it has been 10 years since Zbigniew Ziobro combined the roles of Attorney General and Minister of Justice. She claimed that this arrangement allows for political control over proceedings. She added that although Ziobro has not been in office for three years, Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Minister of Justice Waldemar Żurek have not separated these functions and are using a solution they previously criticized. Zawisza reported that her group has prepared a draft law to separate both positions. She also wrote that Poland is the only country in the European Union where these roles are personally combined, and the Attorney General is most often a politician. According to her, the current arrangement means that the prosecution is subordinate to the minister, and indirectly also to the prime minister, leading to its political control. #Prokuratura #Polska #Prawo (translated)

Mandark wrote that a Polish MEP secretly organized a meeting between the serving Deputy Prime Minister and the president of a foreign state, during which—he claimed—an attempt was made to bribe the president to overthrow the government outside of democratic elections. The author assessed that this meant interference by Poland's greatest ally in its internal politics and differentiated this situation from Donald Trump's support for Nawrocki, as in that case, the outcome was decided by voters at the polls. The author stated that the matter concerning Bielan was about a non-democratic attempt to change power and political bribery. He wrote that although in his opinion there is no appropriate legal provision for this, Bielan should be excluded from the group of people who respect democracy. He called on politicians, journalists, and celebrities not to shake his hand, not to talk to him, and not to invite him for interviews, and condemned his actions so that similar actions would not be repeated. Mandark described Bielan as one of the worst people in Polish politics and accused him of numerous vile and treacherous intrigues. He also wrote that his associate Ziobro is already facing the consequences of his actions and expressed hope that Bielan would face a similar punishment. #demokracja #polityka #zdrada (translated)

Magda wrote that she did not believe Jarosław Kaczyński's declaration about excluding a coalition with Grzegorz Braun. She reminded that in January 2006, Kaczyński said that a coalition with Samoobrona was out of the question, but in April, he signed an agreement with them, and soon after, Andrzej Lepper became the deputy prime minister. According to Magda, Kaczyński later admitted that he acted against his earlier declarations and explained that such things happen in politics. The author assessed that the agreement between PiS and Braun could be easier because both sides agree on issues such as migration, the migration pact, the Green Deal, abortion, same-sex unions, Volhynia, and Banderaism, the policy toward Ukraine, and delegating powers to the European Union. She also noticed similarities in the language of politicians: Braun used the term "eurokolchoz," and Zbigniew Ziobro had previously spoken similarly. She added that people from Sovereign Poland are currently in PiS. Magda also recalled a statement by Przemysław Czarnek, the PiS candidate for prime minister, who in February stated that only cooperation with Donald Tusk and his people was excluded, while other possibilities were open. In her opinion, Braun was convenient for PiS because he loudly stated what Kaczyński had not yet declared and pushed the boundaries that voters could get used to. She believed that PiS's later actions could then appear moderate. Finally, she again pointed to the example of Samoobrona and stated that Kaczyński's earlier assurances about not cooperating with Braun meant little to her. #polityka #koalicje #Kaczyński (translated)

This statement by the current Minister of Justice (and former civil judge!) is shameful. The representative of the executive authority essentially suggests that judges appointed after 2017 are less intelligent, and that if @RomanowskiPL were judging the case, it would not have been dismissed "for substantive reasons" if an alleged old judge were presiding. Mr. Minister @w_zurek, before you go telling the media about the lack of substantive grounds for issuing an iron letter, please familiarize yourself with the jurisprudence of the Appeal Courts in Kraków (e.g., II AKz 523/22), Gdańsk (e.g., II AKz 222/22), or Warsaw (e.g., II AKz 1175/25), and then say that the prosecutor's objection blocks the possibility of issuing the letter. You have dedicated many years of your professional life to fighting against @ZiobroPL and you had the Constitution on your lips, yet now you find the "Ziobro" provision suitable, and you dislike the pro-constitutional interpretation of the regulations, although before 2023 your circle spoke completely differently than you do today. And for how you allow yourself to "ride" on judges publicly due to the fact that you do not like their rulings, you should simply be sued by them. If they do, I will cheer them on. #Sprawiedliwość #Prawo #Sędziowie (translated)