Search

The District Prosecutor's Office in Świdnica is considering bringing animals from the zoo in Łączna back to Poland, if their welfare and the capabilities of local facilities allow it, after an operation was carried out to detain individuals accused of abusing them. #zoo #zwierzęta #prokuratura (translated)

Jacek Zarzecki wrote that the prosecutor's office was considering the return of animals taken from the Łączna Zoo and transported abroad, depending on their health condition. He accused the prosecutor's office in Świdnica of getting caught up in the games and interests of organizations working for animal rights. He also criticized the operation in which — as he described — police cars, arrests, and organizations that presented it as rescuing animals were involved. Zarzecki stated that the animals were taken first and only later did they start thinking about further steps, and he called for a change in the law and a limitation of organizations' impunity. #OchronaZwierząt #Polska #Prawo (translated)

The Municipal Police Headquarters informed that after the statement from the representatives of the detained man, it conducted an audit regarding the money secured during the intervention on Marszałkowska Street on October 16, 2026. In a statement published the following day, the representatives wrote that only a portion of the money the man had with him was included in the inventory of seized items. According to the police findings, an officer found two 100-zloty banknotes in the pocket of the jacket. These were added to the 1,330 zlotys from the wallet, and the total amount of 1,530 zlotys was recorded on the deposit receipt. The police stated that surveillance analysis confirmed the inclusion of the money from the jacket in the deposit, and all the secured cash was returned to the detainee. The KSP stated that the collected material did not confirm the disappearance of any amount during the activities. It reported that the conclusions were based on official documentation, conversations with officers, and surveillance recordings, and that independent actions in this matter were also conducted by the prosecutor's office. #Policja #Warszawa #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the entry addressed Daniel Obajtek with questions about the audit of Orlen no. 238/2018, which he wrote indicated that the actions of the then management could have reduced the company's revenue by around 112 million zlotys. He asked whether during Obajtek's presidency, which began in February 2018, the findings of the audit were forwarded to the prosecutor's office, analyzed in terms of Article 296 of the Penal Code, and whether any explanatory actions were taken. The author reminded that the investigation into fuel price manipulation in 2023 was initiated on January 17, 2024, at the District Prosecutor's Office in Płock, and in April 2024, the prosecutor's office informed about searches at Obajtek's home in matters concerning Orlen. He assessed that Minister Żurek did not initiate this investigation, contrary to the impression that the entry by Obajtek could have created. He added that manually setting fuel prices is not a crime, and criminal liability depends on specific circumstances and the fulfillment of statutory prerequisites. According to the author, comparing the two cases solely based on the price-setting mechanism does not determine their legal assessment. He wrote that the publication of excerpts from the audit does not undermine the validity of the investigation concerning 2023 but raises questions about the actions of Orlen's management regarding the audit findings during Obajtek's presidency. #Orlen #audyt #przemysł (translated)

The author of the entry claimed that 10 prostitutes were working in the apartment of the PO MP Kropiwnicki. He also wrote that the prosecutor's office had discontinued the investigation regarding deriving benefits from prostitution in that location, but sexual services were provided there. https://t.co/MjIC4qf8DN #prokuratura #prostytucja #polityka #PL (translated)

Jack Strong assessed that the judge had no evidential basis to agree to the arrest, and therefore her decision was not an act of heroism. He regarded the very request of the prosecution as absurd, which—he claimed—was a result of telephone pressure from Waldemar Żurek. He added that political pressure can compel a signature or the submission of a request, but it cannot create the missing evidence. According to Strong, the operation, which was supposed to demonstrate Żurek's strength, ended in his disgrace. He also claimed that the prosecutors had mocked him, and Korneluk had previously warned about such a turn of events. He marked the National Prosecutor's Office. #polityka #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Wielowieyska of accepting the police's version as an established fact and assessing the detained individual before the court's decision. He questioned the legal basis for identifying the man who — as he wrote — was calmly standing at the crosswalk, as well as the attempt to take him aside. He asked whether the refusal to provide personal information justified intervention. Kusznieruk noted that pushing away the officers and fleeing did not exempt the assessment of the legality and proportionality of the force used. He also pointed out the choking of the subdued individual, the vulgarities and threats that — as he wrote — were audible on the recording, and questioned whether such behavior was within the standards of human rights. He added that the court had refused to detain the man, and according to the defense, it concluded that the prosecutor had not even demonstrated a high probability of the alleged act being committed. He characterized this as more than just a routine refusal of detention. He deemed the attribution of a crisis to the detainee based on his behavior as public stigmatization. He also believed that publicly presenting him as an aggressor before the court's decision could be seen as incitement, and that journalists should monitor power, rather than act as its spokesperson. #prawaCzłowieka #Polska #policja (translated)

Marcin Edo wrote that Piotr W. was called a "knife man" by Donald Tusk and government media. He added that the prosecutor's office lost in court a case regarding a detention request that Judge Anna Kuzaj did not consider. Edo also used offensive terms towards Tusk and the government. #Polska #sąd #prawo (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk described the court's decision to deny the arrest of Piotr after the protest as a disgrace for the prosecution. He stated that, in his opinion, the lack of high probability of committing a crime meant that the prosecution had not demonstrated the basic premise for applying the arrest. He claimed that Piotr had spent over 50 hours deprived of freedom, and the police conducted a brutal intervention and a request for arrest was submitted without convincing evidence. He noted that the denial of arrest does not mean acquittal, but he considered it a serious signal for the prosecution. He called for the accountability of the police officers and their superiors. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk informed that the court refused to temporarily arrest Piotr W., and after more than 50 hours of detention, the man was supposed to return home. He described that Piotr W. was standing at a red light at a pedestrian crossing, after which the police were said to have chased him, subdued him, and pinned him to the floor. According to the account referenced by Kusznieruk, the man lost consciousness and was taken to the hospital in handcuffs. The author noted that — as he wrote — the specific basis for the initiation of the identification has not been publicly clarified to this day. He added that the prosecution requested a temporary arrest, and the court did not agree to this request. Kusznieruk assessed that arrest should be a last resort and called for an investigation into the basis for the intervention, the use of force by the officers, and the circumstances surrounding Piotr W.'s loss of consciousness. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska informed that the court did not grant the prosecutor's motion for the temporary detention of Piotr W. and agreed with the defense's position. She wrote that the man returned home after more than 50 hours. The author described that on Friday morning on Marszałkowska Street in Warsaw, Piotr W. was waiting for a green light at the pedestrian crossing, after which he was subdued by police officers. According to her account, he lost consciousness and was transported by ambulance on a stretcher, always in handcuffs, even during transport and while at the emergency room. Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that the prosecutor demanded the application of temporary detention, and she, Magda Majkowska, and Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris argued in court that there were no grounds for depriving Piotr W. of his freedom before the verdict. She added that the court agreed with them. She thanked the MPs who — as she wrote — supported Piotr W. from the very first hours, as well as journalists for showing the full recording. Among the people and editorial offices mentioned were Dorota Arciszewska, Marek Jakubiak, Telewizja Republika, wPolsce.pl, and Polsat News. #sprawiedliwość #Polska #prawo (translated)

The author announced a conversation about Donald Tusk, whom he referred to as a dictator. He asked what is happening behind the scenes of the state and stated that the services, the Constitutional Tribunal, the NBP, the prosecutor's office, the courts, and other institutions are becoming elements of an increasingly fierce political war. The conversation is scheduled for today at 14:00. #DonaldTusk #polityka #Polska #PL (translated)

The Black List Pro wrote that the dog was found at the "I Have an Idea" Foundation, which manages the shelter in Świdnica. The author claimed that the animal was neither exotic nor endangered or neglected, and that its owner was the mother of the zoo owner. He asked how and why the dog ended up at the foundation and whose decision it was, addressing this matter to the prosecutor's office. #Świdnica #FundacjaMamPomysł #SprawaPieska (translated)

WolnośćTV referenced statements by Krzysztof Bosak, who said that the previous day there was an attack on a Polish diplomatic convoy in Palestine and the breaking of windows in vehicles belonging to the Polish state. He attributed responsibility to Israeli terrorists. Bosak also accused the authorities in Warsaw of persecuting entrepreneurs and imposing fines amounting to tens or hundreds of thousands for what he claimed were fabricated offenses. He also spoke about the actions of the prosecutor's office, police, and private organizations that were allegedly smuggling animals abroad. He questioned the focus of the conversation on what someone was supposed to have heard in the forest. He stated that a discussion could occur if someone had seen and recorded something. #Polska #konwójdyplomatyczny #prokuratura (translated)