Search

A BLACK N WHITE BR reported that the official website of The Comfort Zone was already up and that the countdown for the experience had begun. According to the publication, the page gathered information about location and access by subway, bus, or car, session times, entrance, tickets, and registration, as well as guidance on themed drinks and exclusive gifts. The profile also mentioned that the website featured records, tips, information to plan the visit, and a visual preview of the exhibition. #TheComfortZone #Exposição #Arte (translated)

The Planet of Football reported that Cristian Martins Abrantes, 21, was robbed at gunpoint near the Bombonera before Vasco x Boca Juniors. According to the report, his girlfriend and a friend were also assaulted by four men, who punched them and pulled their hair. Cristian said the group took his cellphone and jacket. Without their phones, the three were unable to access their tickets with QR Code, and he missed the chance to watch Vasco's first game. They reported the incident at the police station. Cristian described the episode as traumatic and said that the loss of the opportunity to see the team was more painful than the loss of material goods. The report stated that Cristian was from Tocantins, a town of about 16,000 inhabitants in the Zona da Mata of Minas Gerais. He had secured a spot in Medicine and worked as a delivery driver. Cristian said he hoped to be able to watch the return game at Maracanã and that there was a crowdfunding effort to help him achieve that dream. The post mentioned UOL and journalist Bruno Braz. #Vasco #Futebol #Segurança (translated)

The Football Planet reported that Judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto rejected the argument of the Fla-Flu Consortium that the process had lost its object after the deadline to inform Conmebol of the match stadium. According to the publication, the magistrate stated that the entity granted a new deadline, which was met by Vasco, and that the sale of more than 46,000 tickets made it unfeasible to transfer the fans to another stadium. The publication added that Almeida Neto criticized the previous decision for mentioning a basketball game at Maracanãzinho and said that the consortium's arguments contradicted the technical assessments of the security agencies. The judge stated that changing the location would create a “serious and insurmountable” security risk. According to the report, the Public Prosecutor's Office expressed itself twice in favor of holding the game at Maracanã. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Atlético informed that tickets for the game against Coritiba on Saturday (10/17) at Arena MRV were on sale. The Inter Norte section had tickets starting at R$ 29.90 for all Galo na Veia modalities, with specific sales for the section expected to begin on the 14th at 9 am. In the other Inter sections, prices started at R$ 30.00 for members. The club also announced a 90% discount for GNV Kids and said that sales for the games against Montevideo City Torque on 10/14 and Grêmio on 11/07 were still open. https://t.co/Ju6VbFDCkO #Galo #Coritiba #Ingressos (translated)

The News Admiral claimed that the sale of more than 46,000 tickets was one of the arguments for the judiciary to reconsider the decision and allow the Maracanã, since a change of venue would be difficult. The profile described the argument as a "masterclass." https://t.co/L1cZY7S39l #Maracanã #Justiça #Ingressos (translated)

The Planet of Football reported, citing the newspaper O Globo, that the court had reconsidered a previous decision and defined that Vasco x Boca Juniors would be held at Maracanã. According to the publication, the decision took into account assessments from security authorities, who pointed to the stadium as the best option, and the sale of more than 46 thousand tickets, which would complicate a change of venue. The publication added that the court also determined that Flamengo x Botafogo, for basketball, be moved from Maracanãzinho or rescheduled to a time that did not coincide with the football match. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

The Almirante News reported that the Justice had reconsidered the decision and ordered the release of Maracanã for the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors. According to the profile, ticket sales had also been reopened. https://t.co/xJHPrzDJzi #Maracanã #Vasco #Futebol (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto reconsidered, on the morning of Tuesday (13), the decision that suspended the release of Maracanã and reestablished the order for the concessionaire Fla-Flu to make the stadium available for Vasco x Boca, for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20. According to the profile, the magistrate recognized the competence of the president of the 23rd Chamber to authorize the match, cited favorable opinions from security agencies, and took into account the sale of more than 46,000 tickets. The judge also considered that the preservation of the field should not take precedence over public safety and determined the change of location or time of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo, scheduled for the same day at Maracanãzinho. Attention, Vasco fans! It was added that the process would still be analyzed by the Special Body of the TJRJ on the eve of the match. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto reinstated the injunction that required the Fla-Flu Consortium to make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to Tutinha, the magistrate considered that moving the match could pose public safety risks and disrupt the planning already in place, giving weight to the opinions of the Public Ministry and security agencies. Tutinha stated that the judge rejected the consortium's arguments regarding the preservation of the field, believing that any material damage could be compensated for as loss and damages. He also noted that the judge deemed the sale of 46,014 tickets to be significant and dismissed the claim that Vasco's request had become irrelevant with the end of the CONMEBOL deadline. According to the author, the magistrate recorded that the entity had set the new deadline for selecting the stadium as October 13 at 12 PM, Brasília time. Still according to Tutinha, the decision mandated that the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo, scheduled for the Maracanãzinho on the same day, be transferred or rescheduled for a time that did not coincide with the flow of fans. He added that the case would be analyzed by the Special Body of TJRJ in the first in-person session, scheduled for October 19, the eve of the match. #Maracanã #Vasco #SegurançaPública (translated)

The Cruzmaltino Podcast reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, from the Special Body of the TJRJ, reinstated the authorization for Vasco to face Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the report, the decision was signed on Tuesday (13th) at 7:11 AM, and determined that Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. would make the stadium available. The podcast stated that the judge reconsidered a previous ruling that had suspended the authorization. Among the reasons, he pointed out that the prior decision was based on an outdated version of the Internal Regulations of the Court, without considering a change approved in September. The rule, according to the report, allowed the president of the Chamber to review urgent requests when the rapporteur was absent. Since the original rapporteur was on vacation and there was a deadline to inform Conmebol about the stadium, the judge recognized the competence of the president of the 23rd Chamber to grant the authorization. The Cruzmaltino Podcast also reported that public safety weighed into the decision. The magistrate reportedly considered favorable technical assessments regarding Maracanã and the potential impacts of a stadium change on policing, access, fan separation, the press, and broadcasting. The document recorded, based on information presented by Vasco, the sale of 46,014 tickets. According to the podcast, the judge assessed that any material damages to the concessionaire could be compensated, while the risks to collective safety would be harder to repair. Regarding Conmebol's deadline, the report stated that the judge rejected the argument that the request had lost its purpose. The decision reportedly noted that the initial communication occurred within the deadline, and that, according to Vasco, the entity granted a new deadline: that same day at noon. The podcast added that Flamengo x Botafogo, scheduled to take place at Maracanãzinho on the same date, should be transferred or rescheduled for a time that did not coincide with the flow of fans from the football match. It also reported that the process would continue in the Special Body, with consideration expected at the first in-person session the day before the match. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the Institute of Cooperation, Human and Social Development (CODHES) presented, on Monday (12), a factual news item to the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro, requesting urgent measures regarding the denial of use of the Maracanã for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors. The match was scheduled for October 20, for the semifinals of the Copa Sudamericana. According to the publication, the document, signed by the president of the institute, José Roberto da Costa Junior, requested that the responsibilities of the presidents of Flamengo and Fluminense and the administrators of the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. be investigated. CODHES also requested clarifications regarding the powers of the concessionaire and about a possible influence of sports rivalry on the decision. The entity further requested that the Public Prosecutor's Office examine the situation of Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, who, according to journalistic information cited in the statement, was in the Netherlands when she suspended the authorization for the match. The request included clarifications about the trip, any functional suspension, and the exercise of the magistrate's duties during that period. The publication stated that the document mentioned more than 45,000 tickets sold and requested an assessment of possible losses for fans in terms of travel, accommodations, and transportation. The institute pointed out the possibility of compensation for material damages and potential collective moral damages, if the legal requirements were met, in addition to requesting measures to prevent clashes and risks related to the uncertainty of the stadium. According to Attention, Vasco fans!, CODHES also admitted the possibility of filing a collective lawsuit and resorting to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights if it identified violations attributable to the Brazilian state and if the legal requirements were fulfilled. #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana #Vasco (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. submitted a statement to the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro on Monday (12) against Vasco's requests. The company requested that the injunction that suspended the authorization for the club to use Maracanã in the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20, be maintained. According to the concessionaire, Vasco had started ticket sales and confirmed the stadium to CONMEBOL after obtaining a favorable decision on October 9, although knowing that it could be reversed. Fla-Flu also alleged that the club continued sales after the suspension of the decision on October 10, and that this conduct worsened the urgency of the case. The company stated that CONMEBOL's deadline to indicate the stadium had been extended until October 13 at 12 PM, and argued that Vasco should use this period to reorganize the match. The concessionaire cited a document from the Military Police dated October 4, which, according to them, acknowledged conditions for the game at Estádio Nilton Santos. They also criticized the recommendation from the Public Ministry in favor of Maracanã, claiming that it did not consider this subsequent document. Fla-Flu further argued that the writ of security was legally appropriate and questioned the favorable decision to Vasco, granted on October 9, claiming that it altered a previous understanding without new facts and by an authority that, in the company's interpretation, did not have the competence to do so. #FlaFlu #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that hundreds of Vasco fans were picking up tickets for the match the next day. According to the publication, the lines showed the unconditional support of the fans and the strength of the Cruzmaltina crowd in Buenos Aires. https://t.co/6uuxoBFsgX #Vasco #Torcida #Futebol (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the Public Prosecutor's Office of the State of Rio de Janeiro requested that the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro reconsider the suspension of the authorization for the semifinal of the Copa Sudamericana between Vasco and Boca Juniors at Maracanã, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. The Attorney General, Antonio José Campos Moreira, advocated for the stadium to be made available to Vasco, subject to technical, legal, and security requirements. According to the publication, the Public Prosecutor's Office pointed out evaluations from the Military Police that indicated Maracanã as the preferred option, citing public safety, mobility, infrastructure, and crowd organization. The concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. had refused Vasco's request due to maintenance issues and the condition of the pitch; after a decision authorized the game to take place at the stadium, a court injunction suspended its effects. The publication added that, according to the statement, nearly 50,000 tickets had already been sold and fans from different states and Argentina were mobilized. The Public Prosecutor's Office warned of possible logistical difficulties and legal insecurity if the stadium were changed, in addition to mentioning the Conmebol deadline to confirm the venue and the possibility of transferring the match. Attention, Vasco fans! emphasized that this was a request from the Public Prosecutor's Office, not a final decision from the Court. #CopaSulAmericana #Vasco #Maracanã (translated)

Planeta do Futebol reported that, after an unfavorable court decision, the Fla-Flu Consortium asked the court to reject a new appeal from Vasco regarding ticket sales for the match against Boca Juniors. The concessionaire stated that the club should assume the risks of having sold tickets while the injunction could still be suspended. The Consortium argued that the appeal had lost its object due to the proximity of the deadline and that it repeated already rejected arguments. It advocated for the match to be held at Nilton Santos Stadium and stated that there would still be time to reorganize the event. According to the publication, Vasco urgently requested reconsideration of the suspension and claimed that it had begun sales for Maracanã after receiving court authorization. The club argued that the capacity of Nilton Santos, which is 44,661 people, was less than the 46,014 tickets sold, which would require cancellations and refunds. It also pointed out the need to accommodate 4,000 visiting fans and maintain separation areas between the supporters. The appeal from Vasco and the statement from the Fla-Flu Consortium were awaiting analysis from Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, reported Planeta do Futebol, based on ESPN Brazil. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)