On Friday, in the center of Warsaw, the police intervened with a man who refused to identify himself, which resulted in his incapacitation, and the matter was commented on by politicians and experts in the context of the actions of the officers. #policja #interwencja #Legitymowanie (translated)
Waldemar wrote about Piotr Wichert, whom he described as an activist and delegate of PiS, as well as an acquaintance from Arciszewska's district. He described the right-wing narrative, according to which Wichert was severely beaten by the police. As he pointed out, he was allegedly fleeing from being identified, pushed away an officer, who hit her head against a glass door, and had a knife with him. Waldemar added that recordings from body cameras were presented as a manipulation by Donald Tusk's government. The author wrote that Jarosław Kaczyński intervened at the police station, media in the Republic declared Wichert a victim, and representatives of PiS considered the matter persecution. He also criticized what he described as the leniency of the justice system towards politicians from that party. The post ended with the signature of Jacek Fogiel. #Polska #PiS #Sprawiedliwość (translated)
Prem evaluated the recording from the body camera and pointed out nine violations that, in his opinion, were committed by the intervening individuals. He claimed that one of the police officers only provided their rank, without a name, and that the officers did not explain the actual reason for the identification. Referring to Article 15 of the Police Act was, as he wrote, insufficient to justify this action. According to Prem, there were also no legal or factual grounds for the identification, which he considered unlawful. The author also accused the police officers of violating the principle of least intrusive action as per Article 15(6) of the Police Act. He considered a mocking comment directed at the man and an approach within 45 cm to be a manifestation of psychological pressure and a violation of dignity. He also wrote that the order to move to another location had no legal basis. Prem asserted that the officers used physical force without prior calls to comply with the law and warnings required by Article 34 of the Act of May 24, 2013, on measures of direct coercion and firearms. He listed possible consequences: violation of personal inviolability under Article 217 of the Penal Code and potential abuse of power or failure to fulfill duties under Article 231 § 1 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of up to 3 years of imprisonment. He regarded the most significant issue to be the man's escape from the grip. According to Prem, if the grip was unlawful, the citizen would not, in principle, have committed an offense under Article 222 or Article 224 of the Penal Code, and self-defense against the unlawful action of a public officer would not be punishable. #policja #prawo #uczciwość (translated)
The author of the post claimed that the police violated procedures by detaining Piotr without grounds and without giving him a reason. He added that the recordings had been hidden for a long time so that the public would not see the officers' neglect or how severely they beat Piotr. #OddajciePiotra https://t.co/pvIWXutYMS #Polska #Policja #Sprawiedliwość #PL (translated)
Sławek Jastrzębowski wrote that the police officers did not provide the legal basis for identification. He referred to the ruling of the Supreme Court from December 17, 2025, in case file No. II KK 473/25, brought in cassation by the Ombudsman. He pointed out that the court held that a citizen can refuse to provide data if the request has no legal basis, and the refusal does not constitute an offense. Jastrzębowski added that identification interferes with personal freedom and is subject to legal scrutiny, after which he demanded the immediate release of the policewoman and referred the case to the prosecutor. #prawo #policja #wolność (translated)
Suw wrote to the Warsaw Police Headquarters that the identification shown in the recording might deviate from legal procedures. He asked whether it is normal to run after passersby and ask them for a short conversation. He assessed that the recording may be important for the representatives and added that people might be scared and flee when someone stops them without providing legal grounds and a reason. https://t.co/h0CcK0aEXD #Policja #Prawo #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)
NeoJudge Tuleya accused the Capital City Police Headquarters of detaining individuals without legal grounds. He wrote that the officers have gotten used to this, and criticized the order for a person already lying down to lie down, adding that the police are further compromising themselves. #Polska #Prawo #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)
Policja w Polsce przeprowadziła przeszukania w ramach postępowania przeciwko grupie „Bronimy Polskiej Granicy”, która jest podejrzewana o podszywanie się pod funkcjonariuszy publicznych i legitymowanie innych osób, a działania te są związane z bezpieczeństwem publicznym oraz porządkiem prawnym. #BronimyPolskiejGranicy #PrawoKarne #Policja
Prokuratura Regionalna w Warszawie wszczęła postępowanie przeciwko członkom ruchu „Bronimy Polskiej Granicy” za podszywanie się pod funkcjonariuszy publicznych oraz legitymowanie innych osób na Dworcu Centralnym, co zostało udokumentowane na nagraniach wideo i zostało potępione przez władze, w tym premiera Donalda Tuska, który określił te działania jako „chuliganerię polityczną”. #BronimyPolskiejGranicy #Prokuratura #PrawoKarne
Sąd orzekł: Policja dokonała na mnie kontroli osobistej niezasadnie, NILEGALNIE i nieprawidłowo, a to wszystko w związku z bezpodstawnym legitymowaniem. Rozumiem że @PolicjaSlaska nie będziecie hipokrytami i teraz wstawicie u siebie komunikat o waszych nielegalnych działaniach? https://t.co/cAYOPBsmON #Policja #Prawo #Bezpieczeństwo
