Search

Max Hübner wrote that Mr. Piotr, who he believes was beaten by the police, has been released. He added that the court did not impose any restrictions on him and challenged the version provided by the prosecution and the police. Hübner described Piotr as a person who thanked for the defense, said that the wound would heal by the wedding, and forgave, but did not forget. https://t.co/c2Tke38dF8 #Polska #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Sławomir Cenckiewicz thanked the lawyers, the MPs, TV Republika, wPolsce.pl, and "all people of good will," and also wrote that Piotr had been released. He pointed out that not all of the Police operate this way, but he assessed that once again since December 13, 2023, it had become a tool of political repression and lies, serving Donald Tusk's team. He referred to messages about a knife and the statements of the police station spokesperson on Wilcza. He called for abandoning naivety and remembering these events for the future. #Wolność #Prawo #Polska (translated)

The author of the post assessed that Poland was an oppressive state in which any manifestations of disobedience or protest against the actions of the authorities were met with repression. He also encouraged reading the article on wPolityce.pl. https://t.co/A9aSVrbVxJ #Wolność #Protest #Represje #PL (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk described the court's decision to deny the arrest of Piotr after the protest as a disgrace for the prosecution. He stated that, in his opinion, the lack of high probability of committing a crime meant that the prosecution had not demonstrated the basic premise for applying the arrest. He claimed that Piotr had spent over 50 hours deprived of freedom, and the police conducted a brutal intervention and a request for arrest was submitted without convincing evidence. He noted that the denial of arrest does not mean acquittal, but he considered it a serious signal for the prosecution. He called for the accountability of the police officers and their superiors. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Jarosław Kaczyński wrote that he opposed lawlessness and called for monitoring the actions of the authorities. He stated that thanks to the interventions of his environment, lies, violence, and violations of rules during the detention of Mr. Piotr last Friday were revealed. According to Kaczyński, the court did not consider the prosecutor Żurek's request for temporary arrest, and the detainee was treated criminally by Donald Tusk's people and was the main victim in this case. He added that every significant victory begins with the first step. #Polska #sprawiedliwość #wolność (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska informed that the court did not grant the prosecutor's motion for the temporary detention of Piotr W. and agreed with the defense's position. She wrote that the man returned home after more than 50 hours. The author described that on Friday morning on Marszałkowska Street in Warsaw, Piotr W. was waiting for a green light at the pedestrian crossing, after which he was subdued by police officers. According to her account, he lost consciousness and was transported by ambulance on a stretcher, always in handcuffs, even during transport and while at the emergency room. Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that the prosecutor demanded the application of temporary detention, and she, Magda Majkowska, and Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris argued in court that there were no grounds for depriving Piotr W. of his freedom before the verdict. She added that the court agreed with them. She thanked the MPs who — as she wrote — supported Piotr W. from the very first hours, as well as journalists for showing the full recording. Among the people and editorial offices mentioned were Dorota Arciszewska, Marek Jakubiak, Telewizja Republika, wPolsce.pl, and Polsat News. #sprawiedliwość #Polska #prawo (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska informed that the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście in Warsaw did not grant the prosecutor's request for the temporary arrest of Piotr. As she wrote, together with lawyer Magda Prządką and lawyer Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris, she pointed out from the beginning that the prosecutor did not demonstrate a high probability of the alleged act being committed nor any risk of flight, hiding, or tampering. Majkowska added that according to the court, there was no need to apply any preventive measures against him. According to Majkowska, Piotr had not been previously convicted, had a stable life situation, was a member of the volunteer fire brigade, and was a former professional soldier. She also wrote that he participated in demonstrations in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal, and at home, his wife and children were waiting for him. #Polska #Wolność #Prawo (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that the court did not grant the prosecution's request for a month of temporary detention for Piotr. According to Malewski, the prosecutor justified the request with concerns that Piotr might hide and an assessment that there is a high probability of him committing further crimes. Malewski wrote that together with lawyers Magda Prządka and Magda Majkowska, he convinced the court that there were no grounds for imposing detention. He claimed that it was not sufficiently substantiated that Piotr had committed the alleged acts and that Friday's events should be treated as an incident requiring thorough explanation. According to Malewski, Piotr has a permanent place of residence, is socially engaged, and is a firefighter in the volunteer fire department, so there is no real risk that he would hide. He added that after the defenders reached him, Piotr, feeling safer, started limited cooperation with the authorities. Malewski also emphasized that the lack of cooperation is Piotr's right and should not be a basis for preventive measures. Malewski also assessed that the forecast for further criminal activity had no rational basis. He wrote that Piotr had not been convicted and that his behavior on Friday was not aimed at committing the alleged acts, which, in Malewski's view, undermined the legal qualification adopted by the prosecution. He informed that the court did not apply other preventive measures, such as police supervision, and that Piotr would respond to the charges at liberty. He added that assistance was provided as part of a procedural intervention by Ordo Iuris. #wolność #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Brother Pete wrote that it was the 223rd day of his reminding that Paweł Kozanecki killed two women. He claimed that the only punishment Kozanecki would face would be 1.5 years of imprisonment, and he described the ruling of Judge Karol Radaszkiewicz as absurd. https://t.co/Y7MJDYlh9s #Sprawiedliwość #Prawo #Kryminalistyka (translated)

The author of the entry described Donald Trump as an idol of the Law and Justice party (PiS) and a perpetrator of global chaos, also accusing him of helping Vladimir Putin in the destruction of Ukraine and the killing of civilians. He wrote that the Statue of Liberty symbolizes values contrary to Trump's America and should be returned to Europe, which he described as an oasis of freedom and democracy. https://t.co/QB6OxDmJDU #Wolność #Demokracja #Ukraina #PL #US #RU #UA (translated)

Prem evaluated the recording from the body camera and pointed out nine violations that, in his opinion, were committed by the intervening individuals. He claimed that one of the police officers only provided their rank, without a name, and that the officers did not explain the actual reason for the identification. Referring to Article 15 of the Police Act was, as he wrote, insufficient to justify this action. According to Prem, there were also no legal or factual grounds for the identification, which he considered unlawful. The author also accused the police officers of violating the principle of least intrusive action as per Article 15(6) of the Police Act. He considered a mocking comment directed at the man and an approach within 45 cm to be a manifestation of psychological pressure and a violation of dignity. He also wrote that the order to move to another location had no legal basis. Prem asserted that the officers used physical force without prior calls to comply with the law and warnings required by Article 34 of the Act of May 24, 2013, on measures of direct coercion and firearms. He listed possible consequences: violation of personal inviolability under Article 217 of the Penal Code and potential abuse of power or failure to fulfill duties under Article 231 § 1 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of up to 3 years of imprisonment. He regarded the most significant issue to be the man's escape from the grip. According to Prem, if the grip was unlawful, the citizen would not, in principle, have committed an offense under Article 222 or Article 224 of the Penal Code, and self-defense against the unlawful action of a public officer would not be punishable. #policja #prawo #uczciwość (translated)

The Ordo Iuris Institute wrote that the refusal to provide an explanation by the suspect should not be a basis for temporary detention. Attorney Magda Majkowska from Ordo Iuris, Piotr's defender, said that this is his right and that the prosecution cannot justify detention based on it. She added that she has never encountered a case where the mere refusal led to detention. In her opinion, this could mean using detention to force the suspect to provide an explanation in order to regain his freedom. The Institute defined the right to remain silent as a fundamental procedural guarantee and stated that exercising it should not be associated with negative consequences. #Prawo #Sprawiedliwość #Obrona (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Professor Sadurski of condemning the journalist's vulgar comment more strongly than the convicted politician he defends received a five-year prison sentence for crimes involving corruption. He pointed out that the sentence is not legally binding, but in his view, that does not justify disregarding the findings of the first-instance court. Kusznieruk wrote that Sadurski has the right to criticize uncivil language, but he should also address the seriousness of the actions determined by the court. He added that Sadurski's membership in the Venice Commission remains significant when assessing his public statements, although he does not speak on behalf of that institution. He also criticized the closure of discussions under the pretext of fighting trolls, arguing that it is difficult to reconcile that with openness to arguments. #Polska #korupcja #debata (translated)

A photojournalist from the "Washington Post" wrote that after being beaten by settlers, she underwent surgery on a finger that was almost completely severed, and criticized Netanyahu. She reported that Palestinians tried to push the settlers away, and that without their intervention, she probably would not have survived. #Palestyna #Izrael #WolnośćPrasy #US #IL #PS (translated)