Search

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Professor Sadurski of condemning the journalist's vulgar comment more strongly than the convicted politician he defends received a five-year prison sentence for crimes involving corruption. He pointed out that the sentence is not legally binding, but in his view, that does not justify disregarding the findings of the first-instance court. Kusznieruk wrote that Sadurski has the right to criticize uncivil language, but he should also address the seriousness of the actions determined by the court. He added that Sadurski's membership in the Venice Commission remains significant when assessing his public statements, although he does not speak on behalf of that institution. He also criticized the closure of discussions under the pretext of fighting trolls, arguing that it is difficult to reconcile that with openness to arguments. #Polska #korupcja #debata (translated)

A photojournalist from the "Washington Post" wrote that after being beaten by settlers, she underwent surgery on a finger that was almost completely severed, and criticized Netanyahu. She reported that Palestinians tried to push the settlers away, and that without their intervention, she probably would not have survived. #Palestyna #Izrael #WolnośćPrasy #US #IL #PS (translated)

ThePolandNews reported that a police chase involving a 38-year-old driver, who did not stop for a control check in Jastrzębce, passed through three counties of Lower Silesia and ended after nearly 120 kilometers in Boguszów-Gorce. According to the profile, the man, a resident of Wrocław, was wanted to serve a six-month prison sentence for a previous violation of a court ban on driving vehicles, and his driving privileges had been revoked. During the escape, he was reported to have caused a collision with a police car. ThePolandNews stated that he would also be charged with failing to stop for a control check and driving a vehicle despite revoked privileges; he faces up to five years in prison. #Policja #Pościg #Wrocław (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the revealed recordings raised questions about the reason for the police check on the man who was, as he suggested, connected to the protest. According to his reconstruction, the officers followed the man for several dozen meters, demanded his personal information without providing a specific reason for the check, and then incapacitated him inside the building. Kusznieruk noted that the man pushed the officers away and fled inside, but he believed that this did not explain the earlier decision to conduct a check. The author claimed that the man lost consciousness during the intervention, and the knife found with him was not presented as having been used. He also questioned the proportionality of the force used and whether the man deliberately attacked the policewoman when the window broke. Furthermore, he described that several hours later, the detained man was informed that he could meet with lawyer Magdalena Leszczyńska if he provided his details. According to Kusznieruk, the man did not know the lawyer and did not want to see her, while the police considered this a refusal to contact a defense attorney. Kusznieruk also criticized the statement by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who — as he wrote — linked the matter to President Nawrocki. He asked whether the police acted on the orders of superiors, collected data on demonstration participants, and previously observed the man. He directed questions to the Polish Police and the Ministry of Interior and Administration regarding who ordered the identification of Piotr and on what basis. He warned that if the identification of protesters occurred without legal grounds, it could mean using the state apparatus to control citizens. #Polska #Policja #protesty (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk stated that the footage from the body camera raised serious suspicions that the man may have been previously monitored as someone associated with the protest organization. He claimed that the police had been trying from the beginning to establish his identity and asked whether they were acting on orders, who issued those orders, and on what legal basis. Kusznieruk emphasized that the systematic gathering of data by the police on individuals participating in legal protests, without specific grounds for identification, would signify practices characteristic of an authoritarian state. He pointed out that participating in a protest is not a crime, and the police should protect the constitutional freedoms of citizens. He asked the police who ordered the identification of this man and why the officers were interested in him even before the intervention. #protesty #wolność #Polska (translated)

Tomasz Lis wrote that after the walk he talked with the participants of today's demonstration. He described the conversation as surprisingly pleasant and pointed out that he agreed with them only regarding the day of the week. He added that the participants took advantage of the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of assembly, and the authorities should now act in accordance with the law. #demokracja #wolność #społeczeństwo (translated)

The Border Defense Movement reported that a crowd had gathered under the Warsaw Police Command to support their detained colleague. The organization demanded the immediate release of Piotr from the Town near the Constitutional Tribunal. https://t.co/9bVnqFjK8i #Polska #Protest #Wolność (translated)

Jacek Piekara accused PAP of conducting a campaign of lies and defamation against an innocent opponent of the government at the behest of the authorities, whom he wrote it served. He evaluated that PAP was just as journalistic as the propagandists of "Dziennik TVP" during martial law, using derogatory terms against them. #media #prawda #wolność (translated)

The author of the post called for the release of Piotr and wrote that the volunteer from the Town under the Constitutional Tribunal was choked until he lost consciousness and then arrested. He described these actions as brutality and lawlessness of the "Tusk regime" and emphasized that his community would not abandon its own. https://t.co/C4VlnEz1Cz #Wolność #Protest #PrawaCzłowieka #PL (translated)

Brother Pete wrote that for the 222nd time he reminded that Paweł Kozanecki killed two women. He claimed that as a result of Judge Karol Radaszkiewicz's ruling, the only punishment Kozanecki would face would be 1.5 years of imprisonment; he described the verdict as absurd. https://t.co/u9BiKsB8Sq #sprawiedliwość #prawo #mord (translated)

Sławek Jastrzębowski wrote that the police officers did not provide the legal basis for identification. He referred to the ruling of the Supreme Court from December 17, 2025, in case file No. II KK 473/25, brought in cassation by the Ombudsman. He pointed out that the court held that a citizen can refuse to provide data if the request has no legal basis, and the refusal does not constitute an offense. Jastrzębowski added that identification interferes with personal freedom and is subject to legal scrutiny, after which he demanded the immediate release of the policewoman and referred the case to the prosecutor. #prawo #policja #wolność (translated)

Jacek Ozdoba stated that the recordings published by the police revealed, in his opinion, numerous irregularities during Piotr's arrest. He questioned why the officers did not provide a specific reason for requesting documents and emphasized the knife issue, although — according to the account presented — Piotr did not use it. Ozdoba demanded clarification on whether the policewoman sustained injuries and what evidence exists for that. He assessed that the recordings undermined information regarding her health status. He also pointed to allegations concerning actions taken after the arrest, which — as he wrote — could indicate the possibility of a crime being committed. He also questioned the conditioning of contact with a lawyer on providing personal data, reminding about the arrested person's right to contact a defender as stipulated in Article 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He asked whether he was allowed to notify a close person, whether the measures applied were necessary and proportional, and whether he was provided with adequate medical assistance. According to a statement by Piotr W., which Ozdoba referred to, comprehensive medical examinations were not conducted. Ozdoba also raised concerns regarding the legal grounds for the arrest and pointed to the possibility of judicial review based on Article 246 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In his opinion, the actions of the officers should also be assessed in light of Article 231 of the Penal Code. He wrote that a uniform does not exempt one from responsibility, and an arrest does not strip a person of their rights. He added that the course of actions and communication by the police, which he assessed presented many facts in a way inconsistent with reality, raised justified concerns of provocation. #Polska #Policja #Prawo (translated)

The author described the photograph as a symbol of the current authorities' violation of the law and stated that the bar association should intervene in this matter. He wrote that the police cannot condition contact with a lawyer on any terms, because — as he emphasized — this is a fundamental right of every person at every stage of the proceedings. https://t.co/XqfwEMMsUR #prawo #adwokatura #wolność #PL (translated)

Krzychu, addressing Patryk Słowik, wrote that the prosecutor's office arrested the owner, charged him, and restricted his freedom based on four photos that — as he pointed out — had no description or date of execution. He also claimed that activist individuals, who for three days had been starving animals in the presence of veterinarians, police, and the prosecutor's office, remained at large. #prawaosób #sprawiedliwość #zoo (translated)

WolnośćTV cited a statement by Dobromir Sośnierz, who argued that merely possessing a knife does not make a person a knife-wielder if they have not used it, and that they had the right to carry it. Sośnierz compared this to men possessing a tool that could be used for rape, noting that possessing it does not in itself make them rapists. He described this argumentation as an example of "PRL propaganda." The post also referred to the Confederation. #Wolność #Prawo #Propaganda (translated)

The author of the entry announced a meeting at 14:00 in front of the Constitutional Tribunal and called for a large turnout. He wrote that the show of strength is meant to intimidate the regime, which — according to him — threatens the independence of further institutions. He described Donald Tusk as cowardly and stated that he will flee if the participants demonstrate their strength. #Protest #Wolność #Demokracja #PL (translated)

The author of the post wrote that she organized hundreds of gatherings and can distinguish between police securing the area and deliberate provocation. She assessed that the entry of officers into the crowd was an escalation intended to give the authorities a pretext to use force, and encouraged signing a petition to the president in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal. https://t.co/exw8EURfTy #demonstracje #wolność #polska #PL (translated)

The author wrote that the use of brutal force against people who have served their homeland their whole lives was an injustice and an attempt to intimidate the nation. He called for the signing of an appeal to the President in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal. https://t.co/RGCkmXzWt0 #bezprawie #obrona #Wolność #PL (translated)