Search

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that President Karol Nawrocki considered taking an oath before the president a necessary condition for assuming the office of a judge of a common court or the Constitutional Tribunal. According to Bogucki, Nawrocki emphasized that this obligation pertains to the office of the president, not a specific person. Bogucki also conveyed that Nawrocki assessed that individuals taking an oath before the Speaker of the Sejm undermine their qualifications to sit on the Constitutional Tribunal by demonstrating a lack of basic knowledge. He added that the president stated that the Speaker of the Sejm does not have the authority to swear in judges. #Polska #Konstytucja #sędziowie (translated)

The author wrote that the Sejm's choice of a person for the Constitutional Tribunal, whom he believes does not meet the criteria, showed that such a choice is possible. He stated that force rules in Poland, and he called the belief in the validity of the constitution and law a fiction. #Polska #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #PL (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that he was at the Constitutional Tribunal that day because, as he stated, Poland needed the rule of law. He added that he wanted to defend the Constitution, sovereignty, and the future of children, and he opposed the destruction of the rule of law. He emphasized that Poland and Poles should come first. https://t.co/tTBbTXuFMp #Praworządność #Konstytucja #Polska #PL (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that the Polish national interest at that time required presence and expression of opposition to the violation of constitutional foundations. He also emphasized the need to defend sovereignty. #NieOddamySuwerenności https://t.co/8CK9jjx5ma #Polska #Konstytucja #Suwerenność #PL (translated)

The Chief of the Cabinet of the President of Poland, Paweł Szefernaker, thanked those gathered in front of the Constitutional Tribunal for their presence and courage, stating that they showed how important the Tribunal's matter is for Poland. He reminded that President Karol Nawrocki announced the defense of the Constitution against actions of state bodies and institutions that do not respect it. He added that respecting it also requires citizens' engagement. Szefernaker accused Donald Tusk’s government of destroying the foundations of the Republic and the national community for the past three years and attempting to appropriate state institutions and utilize them in political struggles. He claimed that the government’s aim is not to lower the prices of fuel, electricity, pellets, or coal for the winter, to develop the state, or to build the largest airport in this part of Europe, but to take full control over independent institutions. Referring to Karol Nawrocki's campaign in 2025, Szefernaker stated that his camp won despite attacks from the state apparatus, the withdrawal of campaign funds, and pressure. He added that they could not break their spirit, and their hope was Poland. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Konstytucja #Polska (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that Minister Paweł Szefernaker, head of the Cabinet of the President of Poland Karol Nawrocki, spoke during a demonstration in defense of the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal. Szefernaker conveyed thanks to the participants on behalf of the president and stated that Nawrocki intends to uphold the Constitution. Szefernaker accused Donald Tusk's government of destroying the foundations of the state and attempting to subordinate independent institutions to itself. He cited media reports about a team in the Office of the Prime Minister that had prepared 50 cases for the Tribunal in the event of it being taken over by Tusk's people. He also assessed that after taking over public television and the prosecutor's office, the government may seek to take control of the Tribunal, and subsequently the National Bank of Poland, undermining the president's status. The minister pointed out that during Karol Nawrocki's campaign in 2025, his supporters won despite — as he said — pressure and attacks from the state apparatus. In conclusion, he once again thanked the participants of the demonstration for defending the independence of the Tribunal. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Konstytucja #Polska (translated)

The author described the situation as a violation of the right to defense, pointing to Article 42 paragraph 2 of the Constitution and Article 6 paragraph 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. He wrote that resignations and criminal consequences should follow. #PrawaCzłowieka #Sprawiedliwość #Konstytucja #PL #EU (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that thousands of Poles opposed the actions of Donald Tusk and his team, which he described as an attempt to seize a constitutional body of the state. He declared that they would jointly defend the Constitutional Tribunal. https://t.co/WuDzk4TYte #Polska #Konstytucja #Demokracja #PL (translated)

Oskar Kida announced a meeting at 2:00 PM in front of the Constitutional Tribunal at al. Szucha 12A in Warsaw. He wrote that the constitution and the rule of law are the foundations of the state, and he called for a demonstration that they will not allow them to be destroyed. https://t.co/oYQHGUBMtg #Konstytucja #Praworządność #Warszawa (translated)

The Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland stated that Karol Nawrocki, described as the guardian of the Constitution, should not have allowed for the gross violation of the law by the current rulers. The entry also pointed to the president's advisor Alvin Gajadhur and Radio Three. https://t.co/9n8XokDCVQ #Konstytucja #Prawo #Polska (translated)

Piotr Leski recalled that — as he wrote — representatives of the right sharply criticized Andrzej Rzepliński for walking on the sidewalk next to politicians from the Civic Coalition. He contrasted these reactions with the declaration of Michał Wójcik from PiS, who admitted that he meets privately with Bogdan Święczkowski. Leski ironically noted that such meetings are presented as justified discussions about the constitutional crisis. https://t.co/OQhECAMrgU #polityka #konstytucja #kryzys (translated)

Chrzanik cited a statement by Donald Tusk about the Constitutional Tribunal. Tusk was supposed to say that he did not want an open war, but that this perspective frightens Nawrocki and Kaczyński because they know how many actions they have taken contrary to the constitution and how much a real Constitutional Tribunal can fix. He added that work has already begun, and the key is to remove Święczkowski. Chrzanik assessed that Tusk is heading towards complete insanity. He also wrote that there is one year left until the elections, and Tusk knows this. #TK #konstytucja #Polska (translated)

The author criticized Dubyna's post, accusing him of misrepresenting the division of powers, the competences of the Council of Ministers, the rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal, and the concept of a coup d'état. He wrote that the appointed team analyzing the systemic effects of the court and tribunal rulings did not seize judicial power and had no authority to overturn judgments, change decision-making panels, or issue orders to judges. The author stated that Dubyna referred to Article 190 of the Constitution while omitting the difference between the finality of Constitutional Tribunal rulings and the analysis of their legal effects. He also accused him of failing to take into account the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Xero Flor v. Poland and the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-448/23, which — as he wrote — concerned fundamental irregularities in the functioning of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. The author considered the designation of the appointment of the government analytical team as a coup d'état to be a manifestation of a misunderstanding of the principles of state functioning. He also criticized the comparison of the situation to a totalitarian system, stating that it was historically unfounded and offensive to those repressed by the communist state. He added that the use of capital letters and exclamation marks did not lend any legal or intellectual value to the statements. #prawo #konstytucja #Polska (translated)

The author of the entry #Nawrocki2025 wrote that he will not agree to circumventing constitutional procedures. He stated that judges of the Constitutional Tribunal cannot assume their duties without taking an oath to the President of the Republic of Poland, and actions outside of this order will meet with a reaction. https://t.co/yTROwx0zhK #konstytucja #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polska (translated)

Waldemar criticized Adam Dubyna's call for President Nawrocki to ask Donald Trump for permission to use U.S. troops stationed in Poland to restore constitutional order. He wrote that this is no longer a political demand, but a proposal to transfer decisions regarding Poland's internal affairs to foreign soldiers. Waldemar pointed out that Poland has its own institutions, law, and sovereignty, and he considered the idea of using American troops to be contrary to the constitution, the logic of the NATO alliance, and state responsibility. He emphasized that this is a call for external military intervention, not a criticism of the government or a dispute over the interpretation of regulations. In his opinion, such voices did not restore order but instead destroyed it. #Polska #suwerenność #wojsko (translated)

Krzysztof Sałek from KO in Stalowa Wola wrote about a person with a knife under the Constitutional Tribunal and blamed the media supporting PiS, the national right, and its political leaders for any potential bad incidents. He also accused an unnamed person of breaking the constitution and destroying Poland instead of guarding it. #Polska #konstytucja #prawica (translated)

Michał Sopiński wrote that Berek was not a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal and did not have the immunity of a Constitutional Tribunal judge because he did not take an oath before the President of Poland. He cited Article 128 of the Penal Code, indicating that it imposed penalties of 3 to 20 years in prison for actions aimed at violently removing a constitutional organ of the state, from 3 months to 5 years for preparations for such a crime, and from 1 to 10 years for using violence or unlawful threats to influence the official activities of such an organ. #Prawo #Konstytucja #TK (translated)