Search

Adam Mazguła criticized those protesting in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal, claiming they were manipulated by the politics of PiS and Karol Nawrocki. According to him, the protesters defended abuses related to the Tribunal, which — as he wrote — PiS had previously destroyed and subordinated to party interests. Mazguła reminded that the Constitutional Tribunal consists of 15 judges elected individually by the Sejm for 9 years, according to Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution. He asked why Nawrocki does not accept the oaths of the judges if he does not elect them. He argued that the Tribunal should protect citizens against abuses of power, including from the government of Donald Tusk. The author accused Jarosław Kaczyński, Nawrocki, and the television stations he described as spreading Russian propaganda of inciting protests. He urged Poles not to support — as he put it — political oppression, and encouraged photographing and documenting the participants of the protests. #PrawdąWOczy #WPoczuciuOdpowiedzialności #TarczaWolnościSłowa #BronimyKonstytucji #ŻołnierzGorszegoSortu #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa #ŚwieckośćPaństwa #PrawaKobiet #BronimyKonstytucji #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

Aryo wrote that Russian supporters of freedom of speech overlooked, in his opinion, the fact that the creator of the universe and author of the books was sentenced in absentia to 8 years in prison in Russia for criticizing the invasion of Ukraine. He added that the game was created by Ukrainians. https://t.co/6FvI23w1FR #wolnośćsłowa #Ukraina #Rosja (translated)

Karolina Gałecka announced that they are filing a notification in connection with inciting hostility towards police officers. She assessed that the line was crossed a long time ago and emphasized that freedom of speech should not exclude consequences for statements. She added that officers take care of safety every day. #Polska #Bezpieczeństwo #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

The author of the entry appealed to the president to veto the law, which he described as introducing censorship on the internet. He wrote that the government presented the regulations as a tool to combat threats to children and young people, as well as crime, but — as he pointed out — he does not need to be convinced of the need to protect the young and combat crime. #PL (translated)

Radosław Fogiel wrote that the headquarters of the Association of Free Speech looked like the scene of police activity following their intervention, where — as he claimed — officers entered without a warrant. He stated that the person whom the police tried to detain lost consciousness and was taken away by an ambulance. He also mentioned a recording showing the incident and accused that the actions were intended to intimidate the defenders of the Tribunal. https://t.co/ieuyNh6VG3 #WolnośćSłowa #Polska #Prawo (translated)

Adam Mazguła criticized Rafał Jankowski and the board of the NSZZ Policjantów after Jankowski stated that police officers "do not stand on the side of the government." He claimed that such a position undermines loyalty to constitutional organs of the state and could lead to anarchy. He accused Jankowski of having political ties to PiS and argued that his statement encourages police officers not to fulfill their duties. Mazguła referred to Article 27, point 1 of the Police Act of April 6, 1990, and cited the oath taken by police officers. He argued that police officers should serve Poland and its constitutional bodies, including the democratically elected government and the Minister of the Interior and Administration. He also accused the NSZZ board and Jankowski of focusing on pay and benefits. The author wrote that Jankowski did not respond to what he described as cases of death following police interventions, the use of violence against women and peaceful demonstrators, the detention of a female MP, the shooting of a “Solidarity” journalist, as well as repression and falsification of evidence against democratic opposition activists. These were Mazguła's accusations against Jankowski. Mazguła urged policewomen and policemen to serve Poland, not politics, and to use force against those breaking the law. He added that since Jankowski informed institutions of his position, he also conveyed his opinion to them. #PrawdąWOczy #WPoczuciuOdpowiedzialności #TarczaWolnościSłowa #BronimyKonstytucji #ŻołnierzGorszegoSortu #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa #ŚwieckośćPaństwa #PrawaKobiet #WojskoPolskie #Policja #Praworządność #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the post wrote that under the pretext of caring for citizens, political censorship of the internet was accepted without publicity. He claimed that although it was justified by the need to combat the spread of terrorism online, the tools presented in the Sejm in recent days as new had already existed before. He asked what the purpose of these actions was. https://t.co/Uq5H9dT9RU #cenzura #wolnośćsłowa #internet #PL (translated)

Filip Zator wrote that Krzysztof Bosak, during his visit to the TVP in liquidation, compared his position to Konrad's regarding the motivation of Ms. Oracz. According to Zator's account, Bosak believed she acted out of conviction, not for money, and asked why publicize something considered wrong. He also reportedly stated that politicians should not decide on journalists' questions, and expressed concern that in TVP, politicians influenced both the questions asked and who held power, despite the lack of a law. Zator described Bosak's performance as a successful roast and wrote that Confederation was the only party defending freedom and opposing censorship. He added that television should appreciate this, as the president was described in a dehumanizing manner. #Polityka #WolnośćSłowa #Cenzura (translated)

Magda Fitas-Czuchnowska wrote that impartiality at work should not mean a ban on holding and expressing views. In her opinion, it would be unacceptable for people to have to hide behind pseudonyms or have their civil rights limited because of their profession. She asked whether a bus driver transporting activists from one party cannot support another, and whether a doctor with different opinions is prohibited from publicly revealing them. She also cited the example of a Żabka employee near Nowogrodzka, who could lose her franchise for participating in a demonstration for the right to abortion. She emphasized that full professionalism should be maintained at work, while privately, one should not be afraid to express their own opinion. She stated that this is also the rule of law. #praworządność #wolnośćsłowa #profesjonalizm (translated)

The Honorable Polish Ms. wrote that Bosak considered the dissemination of Russian propaganda to be part of his freedom of speech. She added that, in her opinion, this freedom ended where participation in the hybrid operation of a foreign intelligence agency began. https://t.co/B7q0WDA3Rn #WolnośćSłowa #Propaganda #BezpieczeństwoNarodowe (translated)

Włodzimierz Czarzasty called on President Karol Nawrocki to sign a bill facilitating the blocking of illegal content on the internet, arguing that it aims to increase the safety of children and youth, rather than limiting freedom of speech. #bezpieczeństwo #hejt #wolnośćsłowa (translated)

Krzysztof Głuchowski, the director of the Juliusz Słowacki Theatre in Krakow, emphasizes the importance of the new season under the motto "From contempt, from hatred" and the challenges associated with renovations and the announced competition for a director, which coincides with a crucial time for the institution and the stability of its operations. #TeatrKraków #Kultura #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

The author of the post wrote that 135 people have already been detained, and on that day, 20,000 police officers continued to patrol the schools. He also announced meetings with platforms and stated that freedom of speech should not mean tolerance for the fascination with Nazism or the cult of mass murderers. #BezpieczeństwoDzieci #StopNazizmowi #WolnośćSłowa #PL (translated)

Wolność__Słowa wrote that the matter was not about censorship, but about the welfare of children. He recommended a conversation between Piotr Uściński from Rozwój Plus and Ewa Schaedler from Polska 2050, which was conducted by editor W. Dąbrowski. As he pointed out, the nearly 7-minute conversation showed how much freedom of speech was threatened. https://t.co/1yqvUZguq3 #WolnośćSłowa #Dzieci #Cenzura (translated)

The author of the entry spoke in favor of regulating online activities, arguing that freedom of speech should not include actions that harm others or pose a real threat to life, health, or state security. He wrote that the state cannot be helpless in the face of new threats, and he expressed full agreement with Mariusz Gierej. #WolnośćSłowa #Bezpieczeństwo #Regulacje #PL (translated)

Max Hübner described the government's narrative as "full of holes" and accused it of exploiting tragedy to push through a censorship law. He pointed to Gawkowski's statements: first, he was supposed to inform about the immediate blocking of accounts, and a minute later say that a law is needed to block such content and that the government expects it to be signed by the president. https://t.co/SW6JsB20HI #Cenzura #Polityka #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

Jarek Olechowski wrote that those supporting Donald Tusk had created a fake graphic bar resembling materials from Republic TV and were using it to attack the station and demand that the National Broadcasting Council revoke its license. He claimed that the graphic was marked as generated by artificial intelligence, yet it was still disseminated by politicians from the Civic Coalition and journalists supporting the government. He described Republic as the largest news television in Poland and the only major station completely independent of the authorities, and compared the actions described to the Russian machine aimed at freedom of speech and Polish democracy. #WolnośćSłowa #Demokracja #Media (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that after information from the services about possible attacks on the prime minister and the head of the Ministry of National Defense appeared, a wave of comments emerged under the article of one of the largest portals. As he noted, some of them contained mockery, while others openly expressed satisfaction. He asked whether such reactions still fall within the limits of freedom of speech. https://t.co/SFOFj0cbTO #WolnośćSłowa #Polityka #Komentarze #PL (translated)