Antonio Belloni argued that attributing the responsibilities for the failures of previous seasons to Amorim was pointless and harmful, reminding that the coach arrived in the summer. According to Belloni, he was therefore not responsible for either the decline of Milan or the negative results accumulated in the past. The author wrote that the frustration of the fans did not change what happened on the field and that there were no quick solutions to get Milan back to fighting for the Scudetto. He cited the defensive line set up at the crucial moment of the match: Musah, or alternatively Terraciano, De Winter, Pavlo, in the sixth consecutive full match, and Diawara, who played for Troyes in Ligue 2 the previous season. In his opinion, the defeat should not have caused scandal, considering that Milan was on average Champions for points and had the same as a praised and protected technical guide at the beginning of last season. Belloni acknowledged that in the summer the club had taken excessive risks by building a squad without adequate quality reserves. He added that Amorim had admitted from the early seasonal conferences that the choices would have long-term effects and that it was unrealistic to solve in one session the problems of squads poorly built in previous years. According to the author, Milan was already partially paying the consequences of those risks. He also noted that Fofana and Nkunku were technically superior to many reserves, but he urged to consider that the reasons for their exclusion might not be technical. Finally, Belloni described Milan's journey as winding, with or without Amorim, and warned against those seeking an easy scapegoat by simplifying the situation. #Milan #Amorim #Calcio (translated)




