Search

Prem evaluated the recording from the body camera and pointed out nine violations that, in his opinion, were committed by the intervening individuals. He claimed that one of the police officers only provided their rank, without a name, and that the officers did not explain the actual reason for the identification. Referring to Article 15 of the Police Act was, as he wrote, insufficient to justify this action. According to Prem, there were also no legal or factual grounds for the identification, which he considered unlawful. The author also accused the police officers of violating the principle of least intrusive action as per Article 15(6) of the Police Act. He considered a mocking comment directed at the man and an approach within 45 cm to be a manifestation of psychological pressure and a violation of dignity. He also wrote that the order to move to another location had no legal basis. Prem asserted that the officers used physical force without prior calls to comply with the law and warnings required by Article 34 of the Act of May 24, 2013, on measures of direct coercion and firearms. He listed possible consequences: violation of personal inviolability under Article 217 of the Penal Code and potential abuse of power or failure to fulfill duties under Article 231 § 1 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of up to 3 years of imprisonment. He regarded the most significant issue to be the man's escape from the grip. According to Prem, if the grip was unlawful, the citizen would not, in principle, have committed an offense under Article 222 or Article 224 of the Penal Code, and self-defense against the unlawful action of a public officer would not be punishable. #policja #prawo #uczciwość (translated)

The Ordo Iuris Institute wrote that the refusal to provide an explanation by the suspect should not be a basis for temporary detention. Attorney Magda Majkowska from Ordo Iuris, Piotr's defender, said that this is his right and that the prosecution cannot justify detention based on it. She added that she has never encountered a case where the mere refusal led to detention. In her opinion, this could mean using detention to force the suspect to provide an explanation in order to regain his freedom. The Institute defined the right to remain silent as a fundamental procedural guarantee and stated that exercising it should not be associated with negative consequences. #Prawo #Sprawiedliwość #Obrona (translated)

The commentator described the exchange of words between Krzysztof Bosak and Andrzej Szejna. Szejna accused the Confederation of defeatism and pro-Russian sentiments and spoke about the protection of civilian infrastructure and the priority of defending critical infrastructure. Bosak responded that Szejna was lying and urged him to tell the truth. The author of the post assessed that the interlocutors were deceiving people and lying. #Polska #polityka #konfederacja (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Professor Sadurski of condemning the journalist's vulgar comment more strongly than the convicted politician he defends received a five-year prison sentence for crimes involving corruption. He pointed out that the sentence is not legally binding, but in his view, that does not justify disregarding the findings of the first-instance court. Kusznieruk wrote that Sadurski has the right to criticize uncivil language, but he should also address the seriousness of the actions determined by the court. He added that Sadurski's membership in the Venice Commission remains significant when assessing his public statements, although he does not speak on behalf of that institution. He also criticized the closure of discussions under the pretext of fighting trolls, arguing that it is difficult to reconcile that with openness to arguments. #Polska #korupcja #debata (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that after more than 24 hours, he and his team gained access to the detained Piotr. According to him, during the conversation, seven police officers were present in the room, who remained there the entire time, which Malewski considered a violation of the right to defense. He wrote that Piotr had his hands tied behind his back the entire time, and the police justified this measure with an alleged threat to safety, without explaining what it was. The handcuffs were moved to the front for a few seconds so that Piotr could sign a power of attorney for defense and a statement. Malewski reported that Piotr's health condition was poor, he could barely sit, and he felt threatened. He added that the detainee did not know the reasons for his detention and no charges were presented to him. Piotr wanted his defenders to be present at all activities. #Prawo #Obrona #Policja (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that the representatives met with Piotr, who was reportedly handcuffed during the proceedings, had a head injury, dizziness, and felt unwell. According to Hübner, he was surrounded by five police officers the entire meeting. He added that Piotr admitted that the police lied, saying that he did not want contact with his wife or defense. Hübner expressed outrage. #policja #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

The author wrote that the use of brutal force against people who have served their homeland their whole lives was an injustice and an attempt to intimidate the nation. He called for the signing of an appeal to the President in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal. https://t.co/RGCkmXzWt0 #bezprawie #obrona #Wolność #PL (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that together with Bartosz Malewski, she had been waiting for over seven hours at the Capital City Police Headquarters for the opportunity to contact Piotr, who had been detained. She stated that the officer did not approach to talk to the lawyer, explaining that he was dealing with other matters. She asked where, in this situation, the right to defense and the standards of the rule of law were. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #obrona (translated)

RafałDlaPolski5 wrote that attorney Magda Prządka, the defender of the injured man, spoke about hindering contact with the detainee during today's police intervention and violating the right to defense. The author described this as standards under Donald Tusk's government and indicated the Republic as the source. https://t.co/pyexC8BDNh #Prawo #Obrona #Polska (translated)

Mariusz Błaszczak wrote that after the prosecutor's office and police appeared at the headquarters of the Constitutional Tribunal, there was an attack on Adam Borowski's office. He condemned the attack, stating that violence and intimidation should not be methods of political dispute. He called for participation in the demonstration planned for the next day in defense of the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal, which was to take place at 2:00 PM at al. Szucha in Warsaw. He added that defending constitutional principles requires a determined voice from citizens. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Manifestacja #ObronaKonstytucji (translated)

The author wrote that Finland is preparing a strategy and creating opportunities for conducting cyber-informational retaliation actions as part of a proactive defense against the escalation of Russian hybrid attacks. He considered it the right direction for building an effective counter-hybrid defense. https://t.co/Z6BzIGEIGd #Finlandia #cyberbezpieczeństwo #obronaprzedhybrydami #FI #RU (translated)

The Vice President of the Constitutional Tribunal, Bartłomiej Sochański, assesses the situation in the tribunal as chaotic and admits that both the excessive defense of the tribunal and the inappropriate reaction of Judge Berek have led to heightened emotions following the incident involving Bogdan Święczkowski. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #sędziowie #chaos (translated)

The author of the post announced a mobilization for the upcoming Saturday and informed that the demonstration in defense of the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal and Polish values is set to start at 14:00 in front of the Tribunal's headquarters. He encouraged people to come with family and friends, arguing that only a large turnout would scare Donald Tusk and persuade him to back down. https://t.co/FlgajzOGKg #ObronaWartości #Manifestacja #Polska #PL (translated)

Jacek Fogiel wrote that Minister Kierwiński informed about providing protection to two judges of the Constitutional Tribunal by the SOP. According to Fogiel, their names were not disclosed, and the judges requested protection after receiving threats and disturbances outside the building. Fogiel added that Święczkowski described the protection of Maciej Berek and two other individuals, whom he did not recognize as judges, as a coup attempt. The author stated that Święczkowski also described the police dispersal of the blockade of the Tribunal and the swearing-in of a judge elected by the Sejm, which was to be conducted before the president, who — according to Fogiel — had refused to accept it for months. Fogiel accused Święczkowski of preventing these individuals from working, and he called actions contrary to his position a coup attempt. He believed that in this way, Święczkowski was defending his own position rather than the Tribunal. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Ochrona #Polityka (translated)