Search

✅ OFFICIAL: FC Barcelona responds to the statement from Real Madrid. UEFA has not initiated any new disciplinary proceedings against FC Barcelona. The proceedings began in 2023 with the appointment of two investigators, who have since taken actions they deemed necessary. The club has always complied with all their requests. These proceedings have not been resumed because they were never closed. UEFA's statement confirms the receipt of documentation sent by Real Madrid and its assessment by investigators as part of the ongoing investigation. The statement explicitly refers twice to the ongoing investigation and review. Therefore, it does not announce the initiation, resumption, or reactivation of any case, nor does it contain any statements regarding the substance or value of the submitted documentation. It is up to the investigators to decide what actions they consider appropriate in relation to this documentation. To date, they have not approached FC Barcelona with any new requests nor have they relayed Real Madrid's complaint to the Club. If they do, the Club will respond accordingly, as it has done so far. According to the applicable regulations, this act is subject to the resolution of the criminal proceedings ongoing in Spain and will remain there. Since the beginning of the investigation, FC Barcelona has been obtaining UEFA licenses without objection and has participated in UEFA competitions. [@FCBarcelona] (translated)

🚨 Ousmane Dembélé 🇫🇷 : "As Zidane said in his interview: HE WANTS TO SEE ALL THE PLAYERS IN THEIR PREFERRED POSITIONS. He put me as a center forward where I play the most. 😁 After that, I can play on the right, IT DOESN'T BOTHER ME, the most important thing is to have good matches and help the team." 🎙️ press conference (translated)

OFFICIAL: UEFA confirms that it has received a significant number of documents from Real Madrid related to the ongoing investigation into Negreira. UEFA inspectors will analyze these documents as part of the ongoing proceedings. AS reports that Real Madrid has submitted 50,000 pages in thousands of documents, evidence, and statements from various parties. The Royals have requested the revocation of the titles won by Barcelona in the years when the Catalan pride was paying Negreira. (translated)

In 2025, thanks to my swift reaction and the initiation of an investigation, this lecturer was dismissed from the Academy of Justice. Unfortunately, today Maria Ejchart and Sławomir Cudak reinstated Dr. Jakub Czarkowski, who at that time protected this lecturer, to the position of prorector. Meanwhile, the disciplinary spokesperson who effectively prosecuted this lecturer was dismissed by Messrs. Cudak and Czarkowski. (translated)

My brother, I will make a confession to everyone to register this gift I receive. I remember stamping my foot at home and that the "fight" for you to get an education before entering politics was respected. It was already enough that I gave up following my academic education in a linear way. Through ups and downs, I graduated in Aeronautical Sciences, while you exemplary completed your law degree. During this period, you went to fry hamburgers in the United States, worked as a coordinator of a travel agency focused on young people going abroad, did an exchange at the Law School of the University of Coimbra, became a lawyer, a police federal clerk, and the most voted federal deputy in Brazil's history. Later, you set aside any vanity and worked to elect more parliamentarians at the expense of your own votes, even being betrayed by many of those you gave your sweat and lived through so many other experiences that helped shape who you are. Look where you've arrived and all that you have done for our country. Practically alone, with the few contacts you built throughout your education and journey, you reached places that many never imagined and caused profound changes in the Brazilian political and institutional landscape. You are the giant they want to bury alive, but they will never succeed. Back home, even exiled and far from all of us, you are and will always be a reference. The truth needs to be reaffirmed. As always, I am here for whatever you need. Count on me, Warrior. Thank you very much for everything. I miss you all! With @BolsonaroSP (translated)

A study from Stanford reveals that the brain may have originated from two separate populations of embryonic cells, challenging the traditional model of neural development and suggesting an ancient evolutionary division between the anterior and posterior brain regions. (translated)

Mr. Grzegorz, I read the entire justification. And I agree with one thing – legal analysis cannot be replaced with the label of a "neo-judge," because that is not an argument 🤷‍♂️ However, the justification itself, although extensive and internally organized, in my opinion leaves two very serious legal problems. The first concerns Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision states that in preparatory proceedings, a "blanket warrant" can be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of their objection. Here, the prosecutor filed an objection. The court does not challenge the wording of the provision. It consciously deviates from it, considering that the binding objection of the prosecutor would violate the court's jurisdictional independence. It references Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 178 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 47 of the KPP, and part of the case law of appellate courts. This is a legal argument. But there is also an opposing line of case law, based precisely on the linguistic interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the court itself notes in the justification. I wrote about this yesterday. So it is not the case that there is no problem. There is a very serious dispute about the limits of interpretation contra legem and whether the court can practically deprive the premise, which the legislator explicitly included in the provision. The second problem I have is with the prognostic assessment. The court acknowledges that Romanowski left Poland, did not appear for the hearing concerning the temporary arrest, was outside the reach of Polish authorities, and even informed in his own application that he has a passport issued under a different identity 🤷‍♂️ The court considers these circumstances to be burdensome but then assumes that they cannot determine the assessment because one should look at it primarily prospectively. 🤔 And this is where I have the greatest doubt. The prediction of a suspect's future behavior does not occur in a vacuum. Its foundational material is, after all, their past behavior. 🤷‍♂️ If a person involved in the proceedings previously did not comply with procedural mechanisms, left the country, and remained outside the reach of the authorities, then their later declaration that from this moment they will comply with the conditions of the "blanket warrant" must be subjected to particularly rigorous assessment. The court may conclude that despite this, the risk has currently diminished. But it should convincingly demonstrate why specific past behaviors have lost their prognostic significance. Because if we are to predict a person’s future behavior while disregarding their past behavior, then a rather fundamental question arises - on what basis are we actually building this prediction? 🤷‍♂️ Therefore, I would not dismiss this ruling with the label of a neo-judge, but I would also not say that the problem ends with the justification sounding rational. A rationally constructed justification can still lead to a legally debatable result. In my opinion, this is exactly the kind of case we are dealing with here. The argumentation of the court is clear and can be recounted, but both the way of breaking the literal wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the prognostic assessment of the suspect's behavior leave significant legal doubts. If I were to rule on this matter, I would not grant the application. Firstly – due to the prosecutor's objection and the content of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Secondly – even accepting a different interpretation of this provision, I would not find sufficient grounds for a positive prognostic assessment. This is not about punishing Romanowski for the past. It is about assessing whether his past behavior allows rationally to assume that from this moment he will respect the obligations arising from the "blanket warrant." In my opinion – it does not allow 🤷‍♂️ And that is precisely why there is an appellate review. (translated)

In Sweden, the idea of green steel is imploding. Green steel manufacturer Stegra needs billions, and the CEO is leaving. #Stegra #GreenSteel #Sweden #Industry Billion demand: Stegra is building a large plant for green steel in Boden, northern Sweden, where hydrogen and renewable electricity are supposed to significantly reduce CO2 emissions. According to Affärsvärlden, the project now requires at least another 10 billion Swedish kronor, and Henrik Henriksson is stepping down as CEO. Financing: On January 9, 2025, Henriksson stated that Stegra was fully financed. On July 22, 2025, he said the company had the necessary liquidity. Affärsvärlden is now drawing clear parallels to the failed Swedish battery manufacturer Northvolt. The additional billion demand shows the financial and operational pressure one of the largest European projects for green steel is currently facing. Thank you for this important note! Source: (Affärsvärlden) (translated)

I8M publishes a fake photo without a clear label and equips it with the caption "BREAKING"... the labeling of it as "genocidal" and mocking the mention of Huda Jama is pathetic. From an organization that preaches responsibility to others, I expect at least basic honesty towards the public. (translated)

ATTENTION! 🧚‍♂️ 🎁 We are adding an EXCLUSIVE POSTER as a gift to ALL reservations (made and going forward) of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time at GAME. 💚 Double-sided, A2 size, comes in an envelope (white image). ✉️ Reserve NOW. 👇 (translated)

🚨🚨 Dino TOPPMÖLLER 🇩🇪 VIDEO ON HIS DEPARTURE FROM RC LENS!!! 👇 🗣️ “I was completely taken aback. I was ASTOUNDED. For me, it was not wise to consider parting ways with someone who had done nothing extraordinary. The conversation took place in a very harmonious atmosphere over those two hours. They wanted to convince me that it would be better for me and for the whole group. 😳 They told me that they considered this step so necessary that if I did not accept it, they would have to terminate my contract definitively. If I were to violate certain values, I was willing to risk losing my position. It is important that I can still look at myself in the mirror today, rather than sitting on a bench. It hurts me a little to leave the club because I saw a lot of potential in the players and I had already built relationships with many of them... I do not need a year of rest right now.” 🎙️ Playmaker via @DahbiaHattabi (translated)

As a heroic pilot of Indian origin saved almost 200 passengers from FlyDubai. The FlyDubai pilot Smit Machchhar, of Indian origin, has been identified by the Israeli press as the hero of a flight bound for Tel Aviv carrying almost 200 passengers. According to reports, Machchhar resisted a sudden attack from his co-pilot from Oman, preventing him from crashing the plane in what could have been a "second September 11." After the plane was diverted to Tabuk, passengers spoke about the suffering they experienced, explaining that both Machchhar and the other pilot were injured after the incident. Both were taken to the hospital, and the assailant was arrested by Saudi Arabian police. According to his LinkedIn profile, Machchhar spent eleven years at SpiceJet, working as a senior commander and later as a line instructor captain. In June 2022, he moved to FlyDubai as a captain, having accumulated almost 10,000 flight hours. Although the exact details of the incident have not yet been disclosed by the authorities, passengers stated that they had intervened to subdue the assailant. After that, two off-duty pilots on board took control of the aircraft and landed it safely. (translated)

The position expressed by President Trump clearly shows what the political will is on the part of the USA. Much now depends on how the Polish government will proceed. We want as many American soldiers as possible to be stationed permanently in Poland. President Nawrocki has engaged in an important matter for us – the release of Andrzej Poczobut – and these efforts have been successful. Without the USA, this would not have been possible. This also shows how our alliance works. The stronger our position in the region, the greater our possibilities for action will be. Good relations with the USA and communication channels are crucial, allowing us to present our Polish perspective to our American partners. Advisor to the President of the Republic of Poland Nikodem Rachoń, @PolsatNewsPL (translated)

Ferat Koçak, who is financed with around 17,500 euros in tax money monthly, has entangled himself in a web of excuses and direct connections to organized crime. That a highly paid representative accepts a donation in the form of a smartphone from the son of the well-known clan leader Issa Remmo - allegedly for Antifa youths whose phones were seized by the police - haha, right, borders on parody. His claim that he initially did not know who he was chatting with despite his position as a domestic politician either reveals a shocking incompetence or bold protective claims. It becomes even more scandalous when looking at the process: Even when Koçak stated that he realized in the Remmo family's office who was in front of him, he did not break off contact. No. He still took the phone and contacted Firas Remmo again of his own accord two weeks later. To complete the audacity, he asked the clan's son to spread a speech in the Bundestag in which Koçak trivializes the term "clan criminality" as a mere political battle term. Anyone who so openly seeks closeness to criminal structures and simultaneously lives off taxpayers has squandered all political credibility! The late remorse and the framework of excuses about an allegedly "overwhelming situation" seem all the more ridiculous against this backdrop. A member of the Bundestag who sends heart greetings to the clan milieu via voice message ("I kiss your heart, brother") and prefers to do politics "for the street" rather than for parliament is simply unacceptable for a constitutional body! If a parliamentarian so openly colludes with representatives of organized crime, they should no longer be paid from tax funds and should be immediately relieved of all political positions! (translated)