Search

Karmine Corp announced that it would face MVK_VN in the second round of the Worlds 2026 play-ins, scheduled to start at 8 PM. After a twist-filled series the day before, the team said it wanted to show its true potential on stage and get closer to the Swiss Stage. https://t.co/TJRjmLzkN3 https://t.co/1BZVK6LUYE #Worlds2026 #KCORP #Esport (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the President of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, did not grant, on Thursday (15), the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana. According to the report, Salomão considered that the concessionaire, constituted by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not have the legitimacy to appeal to this legal instrument, as it is a private company and does not act as a delegate of public service. The minister also understood that the choice of the stadium did not constitute a primary public interest that would justify the exceptional request. The publication stated that Fla-Flu Serviços had claimed risks related to the meeting of the fans, the operation of the stadium, the pitch, and the need for a minimum interval of 72 hours between matches. According to the report, Salomão concluded that the company did not prove a serious threat to public order, security, or the economy. He also pointed out that the transfer of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo alleviated some of the concerns. Furthermore, according to Attention, Vasco fans!, the minister considered that potential damage to the pitch would not constitute serious harm to public assets nor justify the suspension. The publication added that he evaluated that the request could not substitute for a judicial appeal and that any questioning regarding the actions of judges from the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro should follow the appropriate appeal channels. The decision maintained the authorization for the match at Maracanã without suspension by the STJ. The publication described the outcome as a procedural victory for Vasco but noted that it did not end all possibilities for judicial contestation. It also informed that the decision concerning Safety Suspension No. 3,678/RJ was signed at 12:49 PM on October 15, 2026. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

Karmine Corp indicated that their first match in the history of the League of Legends Worlds would take place in the first round of the 2026 play-in, against Cloud9, at 8 PM. The club aims to qualify for the Swiss Stage. https://t.co/TJRjmLzkN3 https://t.co/LHJSOrqz1R #LeagueOfLegends #Worlds2026 #Esports (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha argued that Vasco should terminate its contract with Greenleaf. He claimed that the company had produced controversial reports and opinions in the legal dispute over Maracanã, used against the club's interests. Tutinha also requested that the MPRJ, PGE, and control bodies investigate the stadium's concession contract and compliance with the notice, especially in the application of technical and equitable criteria. According to him, the concessionaire managed a public asset and should be accountable for its decisions. Finally, he requested an investigation into the actions of the vice-president of TJRJ, Suely Lopes Magalhães, including the circumstances and competence of her decision, the compliance with the rules of the judicial planton, and the contradictions that, according to him, were pointed out in the decision that subsequently reconsidered its effects. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto reconsidered, on the morning of Tuesday (13), the decision that suspended the release of Maracanã and reestablished the order for the concessionaire Fla-Flu to make the stadium available for Vasco x Boca, for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20. According to the profile, the magistrate recognized the competence of the president of the 23rd Chamber to authorize the match, cited favorable opinions from security agencies, and took into account the sale of more than 46,000 tickets. The judge also considered that the preservation of the field should not take precedence over public safety and determined the change of location or time of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo, scheduled for the same day at Maracanãzinho. Attention, Vasco fans! It was added that the process would still be analyzed by the Special Body of the TJRJ on the eve of the match. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto reinstated the injunction that required the Fla-Flu Consortium to make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to Tutinha, the magistrate considered that moving the match could pose public safety risks and disrupt the planning already in place, giving weight to the opinions of the Public Ministry and security agencies. Tutinha stated that the judge rejected the consortium's arguments regarding the preservation of the field, believing that any material damage could be compensated for as loss and damages. He also noted that the judge deemed the sale of 46,014 tickets to be significant and dismissed the claim that Vasco's request had become irrelevant with the end of the CONMEBOL deadline. According to the author, the magistrate recorded that the entity had set the new deadline for selecting the stadium as October 13 at 12 PM, Brasília time. Still according to Tutinha, the decision mandated that the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo, scheduled for the Maracanãzinho on the same day, be transferred or rescheduled for a time that did not coincide with the flow of fans. He added that the case would be analyzed by the Special Body of TJRJ in the first in-person session, scheduled for October 19, the eve of the match. #Maracanã #Vasco #SegurançaPública (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha stated that Suely Lopes Magalhães, vice president of TJRJ, was in the Netherlands and was not part of the judiciary's on-call service when she made a decision that he considered disconnected in a writ of security. According to him, the judge responsible for the appeal later overturned the decision. Tutinha also asked if they could talk about her calmly. #Justiça #TJRJ #MandadoDeSegurança (translated)

newscolina reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, from the Special Body of TJRJ, determined that the Flamengo x Botafogo match, scheduled for Maracanãzinho on the same day as Vasco x Boca Juniors, be transferred or rescheduled to a time that does not coincide with the flow of football fans. According to the publication, the NBB game had been used by the Consortium as an argument to prevent Vasco from playing in the stadium for the semifinals of the Sul-Americana. The publication credited the information to PodCruzmaltino and the photo to Matheus Lima. #Flamengo #Botafogo #TJRJ (translated)

A news outlet reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, from the Special Body of TJRJ, reconsidered the emergency decision that suspended the authorization for Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the publication, he ordered Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to make the stadium available for the match, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM, and reinstated the guardianship previously granted to Vasco. The decision was signed on Tuesday (13) at 7:11 AM. The publication cited PodCruzmaltino and credited the photo to Dikran Sahagian. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

The Cruzmaltino Podcast reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, from the Special Body of the TJRJ, reinstated the authorization for Vasco to face Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the report, the decision was signed on Tuesday (13th) at 7:11 AM, and determined that Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. would make the stadium available. The podcast stated that the judge reconsidered a previous ruling that had suspended the authorization. Among the reasons, he pointed out that the prior decision was based on an outdated version of the Internal Regulations of the Court, without considering a change approved in September. The rule, according to the report, allowed the president of the Chamber to review urgent requests when the rapporteur was absent. Since the original rapporteur was on vacation and there was a deadline to inform Conmebol about the stadium, the judge recognized the competence of the president of the 23rd Chamber to grant the authorization. The Cruzmaltino Podcast also reported that public safety weighed into the decision. The magistrate reportedly considered favorable technical assessments regarding Maracanã and the potential impacts of a stadium change on policing, access, fan separation, the press, and broadcasting. The document recorded, based on information presented by Vasco, the sale of 46,014 tickets. According to the podcast, the judge assessed that any material damages to the concessionaire could be compensated, while the risks to collective safety would be harder to repair. Regarding Conmebol's deadline, the report stated that the judge rejected the argument that the request had lost its purpose. The decision reportedly noted that the initial communication occurred within the deadline, and that, according to Vasco, the entity granted a new deadline: that same day at noon. The podcast added that Flamengo x Botafogo, scheduled to take place at Maracanãzinho on the same date, should be transferred or rescheduled for a time that did not coincide with the flow of fans from the football match. It also reported that the process would continue in the Special Body, with consideration expected at the first in-person session the day before the match. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

An intern from VASCO stated that the acting president of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro determined that the decision regarding Maracanã be made collegially in the following hours. The author supported the measure and said that the series of injunctions would not resolve the situation. He also predicted that the parties would reach an agreement and that the game would be played at Maracanã. #Maracanã #TJ_RJ #justiça (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that Vasco da Gama filed a motion with the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) to defend the decision that determined the availability of Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the publication, the document was filed on Saturday (the 10th) and requested that the attempt by the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision through a writ of security be rejected. The publication reported that the club argued that the court decision took into account statements from public security agencies and the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro. According to Vasco, the Military Police pointed to Maracanã as the preferred alternative, considering the infrastructure, urban mobility, fan organization, and access control. The club also questioned, according to the publication, the criteria used by the concessionaire to deny the stadium and argued that the requirements for preserving the pitch should be applied objectively and equally. The defense also stated that Conmebol had already announced Maracanã as the venue and that ticket sales were underway. By the morning of October 10, Vasco reported having sold 11,446 tickets and handed over 4,000 tickets to Boca Juniors for the visiting fans. Attention, Vasco fans! the club added that it warned of possible damages to the organization of the semifinal, to the supporters, and to the security planning if the decision were suspended. Vasco requested that the concessionaire's injunction be denied and that the writ of security be rejected, maintaining the decision that secured the stadium. According to the publication, the legal dispute was still ongoing. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that the Fla-Flu Consortium appealed to the president of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro to try to reverse the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the profile, the consortium filed a writ of security and requested an urgent measure while the appeal was being analyzed. The consortium stated it had authorized six requests from Vasco since the start of the concession, including classics against Flamengo and Fluminense. The authorization for the match with Boca Juniors would remain valid, unless the court accepted the request, the profile added, citing O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Futebol (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the TJRJ, ordered the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors to be held at Maracanã and took into account the history of conflicts between Vasco and the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. Tutinha stated that the magistrate pointed out that the club had already sought justice to use the stadium and that the concessionaire had repeated justifications related to the condition of the pitch, which could indicate a "personal issue" between the parties. According to Tutinha, Ibrahim also considered a Memorandum of Understanding between Vasco and the concessionaire. The club argued that the document guaranteed it four matches per season at Maracanã, excluding classics against Flamengo and Fluminense, and that any refusals should be based on objective technical and operational criteria. Tutinha added that Vasco pointed out a contradiction in how the concessionaire invoked the memorandum to restrict access but contested its binding force when it provided rights to the club. Ibrahim considered the document in his reasoning but did not make a definitive decision on the enforceability of all clauses. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro, determined that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. should make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors, for the semifinals of the Copa Sul-Americana, on October 20, at 9:30 PM. The decision was granted this Friday (9), after a request from Vasco against the concessionaire's refusal, which had alleged technical issues related to the maintenance and restoration of the field. According to the publication, the magistrate considered statements from the Military Police and the Public Ministry of Rio de Janeiro, which pointed out the stadium as a preferred alternative due to structural, logistical, and operational conditions, as well as issues of safety and urban mobility. He also mentioned previous disputes between the club and the concessionaire regarding the use of the stadium. The decision also determined that the Maracanã should be offered to Vasco under commercial and operational conditions equal to those practiced for Flamengo and Fluminense, respecting legal, technical, and safety requirements. The publication stated that compliance was urgent, as Vasco needed to inform CONMEBOL by October 10 which stadium would host the match, and that the concessionaire could still present its defense. #Maracanã #Vasco #SulAmericana (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that the judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, president of the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of TJRJ, granted a preliminary injunction requested by Vasco and ordered the concessionaire Fla-Flu to make Maracanã available for the semifinal of the South American Cup on 10/20, between Vasco and Boca. According to Tutinha, the magistrate prioritized public safety over the conditions of the pitch, mentioned statements from the Military Police and the Public Prosecutor's Office, and stated that the history of conflicts between Vasco and the concessionaire seemed to indicate a "personal issue." The decision would also guarantee the club equal commercial and operational conditions to those of Flamengo and Fluminense, with immediate compliance, including by a court official on duty. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)