Menee erikoiseksi. ”STEA salaa asiakirjat, jotka liittyvät sosiaali- ja terveysministeri Rydmanin (ps) linjaamien avustuskriteereiden valmisteluun. Julkisoikeuden prof Voutilainen ei näe kestäviä perusteluja sille, että STEA hylkäsi STT:n tietopyynnön.” https://t.co/oaEOR91KC1 #Suomi #sosiaalipolitiikka #terveyspolitiikka
Kun hyvinvointialueet joutuvat nyt maksamaan suomalaisten potilaiden syöpälääkkeet, kuten laki määrää, ne voivat joutua pahimmillaan leikkaamaan jopa maahanmuuttajien hammasimplanteista ja hiilineutraalisuusohjelmista. Miten meidän sitten käy?😱 #hyvinvointi #terveyspolitiikka #maahanmuutto
Although cancer treatment is mostly as good here as elsewhere, access to treatment needs to be expedited. And if, for example, a new cancer drug has already been introduced in Sweden or Denmark, wouldn't it be better to utilize these experiences rather than starting the whole process from scratch ourselves? (translated)
Earlier in the spring, the MOT program revealed that in Finland, the life expectancy for certain types of cancer is shorter than in other Nordic countries. The diagnosis is received more slowly, and the approval process for new medications takes longer than in comparable countries. This cannot be the case. This issue simply needs to be corrected. (translated)
Nyt olen havainnut sellaistakin, että edellinen hallitus ja etenkin vastuuministeri @LindenAki on säätänyt sellaisenkin lain, että Kela voi sanottua lakia soveltamalla jättää syöpälääkkeitä korvaamatta. No. Minkäs teet, kun kaiken voi tehdä reilummin. Hyvää yötä. #Terveyspolitiikka #Lainsäädäntö #Syöpälääkkeet
The reimbursement issue from Kela: the matter seriously affects sick people and is therefore very serious. The legislation on which Kela's latest interpretation is based originates from 2004. Its current wording was confirmed during the last parliamentary term by the Minister of Family Affairs and Social Services, Aki Lindén. (translated)
Today there is again outrage. Minister @willerydman has made a decision to allocate organization funds to grassroots work, that is, to what is important. Not for lobbying, for wealthy organizations, or based on non-health-related backgrounds or identity groups. Who can be against this? (translated)
