💣🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: This week, Joan Laporta met with Aleksander Čeferin and Nasser Al-Khelaïfi on the sidelines of the EFC general assembly. UEFA has informed Barça that it has NO intention of sanctioning the club regarding the Negreira case, as it is primarily a matter for the Spanish judiciary, which has not found the club guilty to date. ❌⚖️ (translated)
THE MOHAMED SANHADJI CASE HAS CAUSED A REAL SHOCK within Didier Deschamps' former staff. Several members of the France team management say they are "shocked" and even feel "betrayed" after the revelations from L’Équipe. "We fell from the cupboard." The PDF of the investigation has circulated widely on WhatsApp among former players and staff members. Many believed until now that "Momo's" problems were mainly related to his relationship with Kylian Mbappé. Indicted for corruption, influence peddling, and fraud, the former security officer is now forbidden from contacting the football community. (translated)
"We had 80 million euros this summer in lost revenue." Jean Castex, the president of the SNCF group, acknowledged during a press conference that it was a "very difficult" summer. (translated)
The technique called the "bar car" by @NunezLaurent is now proven and works well. As in the Rima Hassan affair, the minister of the Interior's fabrications are taken up and disseminated in full without any perspective or analysis by journalists. A fine example on ORTF. (translated)
In response to the statements made by the British Prime Minister, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated on the social network X that the British authorities were "on the wrong track." (translated)
Simple question: If you are as sure of yourself as you claim, why didn't you choose the direct citation? You could have gone directly to the correctional court and obtained a hearing in a very short time. A judgment could have been made in a few months. Instead, you chose a much longer procedure, the outcome of which we probably won't know for a long time. So the question is simple: why avoid the fastest route to have the matter decided publicly by a court? (translated)
The case surrounding Jordan Bardella could lead Marine Le Pen to consider censoring the Lecornu government, despite her recent hesitations to do so in order to avoid a financial crisis. (translated)
Cédric Jubillar revealed during an interrogation before the reconstruction of his wife's murder that he had decided to hide her body after strangling her during an argument. (translated)
Simple question: If you are as sure of yourself as you claim, why didn't you choose the direct citation? You could have filed directly with the correctional court and obtained a hearing in a very short time. A judgment could have been made in a few months. Instead, you chose a much longer procedure, the outcome of which we probably won't know for a long time. So the question is simple: why avoid the quickest route to have the matter publicly decided by a court? (translated)
🚨 Thierry Henry 🇫🇷 on the Cristiano Ronaldo 🇵🇹 case: " I HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUDGE HOW IT ENDS. ❌ I’m talking about the player, what he has done and what he represents. I like to highlight his way of being, his obsession with football and records. Without his obsessions, we wouldn’t have known this player. We have experienced extraordinary things with him. I HAVE ENORMOUS RESPECT FOR HIM. Just as I do for Messi." (translated)
A psychiatrist mentions temporary dementia in Nicolas Ullens, accused of killing his mother-in-law, which could lead to his acquittal if the jury accepts this defense. (translated)
Real Madrid submitted a substantial file to UEFA regarding the Negreira case, prompting FC Barcelona to remind that no new proceedings have been opened against it. (translated)
Mediapart claims to have authenticated anti-Semitic messages attributed to Jordan Bardella, using evidence from Facebook and a bailiff, thus provoking reactions and questions about the political implications of this matter. (translated)
ALERT - Mediapart has just published VOLUME 2 of the Bardella case THE EVIDENCE (translated)
I direct you to this video about the Negreira case. Away from club bias, rumors, we stick to the facts. 👇🏼 (translated)
🚨🚨 COMMUNIQUE FROM FC BARCELONA!!! THE BLAUGRANA CLUB DENIES ANY NEW UEFA PROCEDURE ENGAGED AGAINST BARÇA. ❌ “In response to reports published regarding the alleged reactivation of the UEFA procedure in the Negreira case, FC Barcelona wishes to clarify the following: UEFA HAS NOT OPENED ANY NEW PROCEDURE AGAINST FC BARCELONA. ❗️ The procedure was initiated in 2023, with the appointment of two investigators who have since taken the action they deemed appropriate. The Club has always responded to all their requests. These procedures have not been reopened because they have never been closed. The UEFA statement confirms the receipt of the documentation submitted by Real Madrid and indicates that the investigators will evaluate it as part of the ongoing investigation. The same text expressly refers, twice, to an investigation and review that are “ongoing.” It does not announce the opening, reopening, or reactivation of any procedure, nor any assessment of the substance or value of the documentation provided. It invites the investigators to determine what action, if any, they deem appropriate regarding this documentation. To date, they have not made new requests to FC Barcelona and have not forwarded Real Madrid's complaint to the club. Should they do so, the Club will respond accordingly, as it has done so far. In accordance with the applicable legislation governing this matter, these procedures are subject to the outcome of the criminal case currently being heard in Spain and will continue to be so. Since the beginning of the investigation, FC Barcelona has continued to obtain its UEFA license without objection and has participated in UEFA competitions. To facilitate the verification of information, we reproduce below the complete original text of the UEFA statement: “UEFA can confirm that it has received from Real Madrid CF a substantial amount of documents related to the ongoing investigation into FC Barcelona in the case involving José María Enríquez Negreira, the former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees of the Royal Spanish Football Federation (the so-called "Negreira" case). UEFA's ethical and disciplinary inspectors have also received these latest documents, which they will evaluate as part of their ongoing review. FC Barcelona reiterates its full cooperation with the competent authorities and calls for rigor and accuracy in reporting this procedure.” (translated)
OFFICIAL | FC Barcelona confirms that no new investigation has been opened by UEFA regarding the Negreira case, other than the ongoing one in 2023. The club has always cooperated and will continue to do so. (translated)
In response to the reports published regarding the alleged reactivation of the UEFA procedure in the Negreira case, FC Barcelona wishes to provide the following clarifications: UEFA has opened no new procedure against FC Barcelona. The procedure was initiated in 2023, with the appointment of two investigators who have since taken the action they deemed appropriate. The Club has always responded to all their requests. These procedures have not been reopened because they have never been closed. UEFA's statement confirms the receipt of the documentation submitted by Real Madrid and indicates that the investigators will evaluate it as part of the existing inquiry. The same text expressly refers, twice, to an investigation and review that are "ongoing." It does not announce the opening, reopening, or reactivation of any procedure, nor any evaluation of the substance or value of the documentation provided. It encourages the investigators to determine what action, if any, they deem appropriate regarding this documentation. To date, they have not made new requests to FC Barcelona and have not forwarded Real Madrid's complaint to the club. If they do, the Club will respond accordingly, as it has done thus far. In accordance with the applicable legislation governing this matter, this procedure is subject to the outcome of the criminal case currently being heard in Spain and will continue to be so. Since the beginning of the investigation, FC Barcelona has continued to obtain its UEFA license without objection and has participated in UEFA competitions. To facilitate the verification of information, we reproduce below the complete original text of UEFA's statement: "UEFA can confirm that it has received from Real Madrid CF a substantial amount of documents related to the ongoing investigation into FC Barcelona in the case involving José María Enríquez Negreira, the former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees of the Royal Spanish Football Federation (the so-called 'Negreira' case). UEFA's ethical and disciplinary inspectors have also received these documents which they will evaluate as part of their ongoing review." FC Barcelona reiterates its full cooperation with the competent authorities and calls for rigor and accuracy in the reporting of this procedure. (translated)
🚨🚨 OFFICIAL COMMUNIQUE: Barcelona confirms that UEFA has opened NO new case regarding the Negreira affair. The case was opened in 2023 and has never been closed. The documents sent by Real Madrid will be examined as part of the existing investigation. Barcelona also specifies that to date, UEFA has not made any new requests to them and has not forwarded Real Madrid's complaint to them. (translated)
UEFA will open an investigation into the Negreira case following a complaint from Florentino Perez. Obviously, nothing will happen in the end. We were just the best team in the world for the decade and everyone knows it very well. (translated)
