Search

The Lisbon police ordered the removal of a tent set up for children during a protest in Rossio, claiming it was illegal, which caused outrage among the protesters who defended the space as a place for family activities. #Manifestações #AcampadaDeLisboa #DireitosDasCrianças (translated)

Iúri Rodrigues, commander of the PSP, argues that the use of force in protests in Lisbon was necessary and proportionate, despite the criticism, and says he understands the public's outrage, but emphasizes that the blame does not fall on the police. #PSP #Protestos #IúriRodrigues (translated)

The author stated that Daniela Lima had first-hand released a UN report questioning Meta for interference in the Brazilian election. According to him, experts from the Human Rights Council demanded that the company protect political expression and take effective measures during the electoral period after receiving reports of restrictions on the platforms. He said that the issue involved freedom of expression, association, and equality among political positions, and claimed that Meta limited the reach of one side while amplifying the other. He also asserted that the company was not neutral and that the UN had already demanded explanations. The author listed among the topics circulating “#WhoIsMarianaFlavio,” “#7MillionLulaSoldiers,” “JUSTICE FOR ANA CLARA,” Quaest, “CENSORSHIP NEVER AGAIN,” “FLAVIO AND RED COMMAND,” “#FlavioOwnerOfBet,” “#CensorshipNo,” Felipe Nunes, “4 days left,” “FLAVIO IS COLLOR,” “WAKE UP JANONES,” “45% and Lula,” Kassio and Mendonça and rejection. At the end, he asked readers to share the publication and claimed they would try to silence the matter. #LiberdadeDeExpressao #CensuraNuncaMais #Eleições2024 (translated)

The BTS Project Brazil stated that the outrage of the BARMYS over the reduction from 12 to 4 screens at the tour shows was discussed on open TV and was the topic of the program Balanço Geral. According to the profile, the audience protested against Live Nation for lack of transparency and damage to visibility at MorumBIS. https://t.co/7HT799SFfk #BARMYS #LiveNation #Protesto (translated)

Hayy stated that thousands of people from the Northeast were manifesting and showing indignation after the video of Nikolas Ferreira was silenced. The author said that the population of the region had a voice and the right to express themselves and declared that the Northeast would not be silenced. https://t.co/dobCocpbQ9 #Nordeste #LiberdadeDeExpressão #VozDoPovo (translated)

A Chinese student was deported from Russia after being expelled from Moscow State University for displaying the Rising Sun flag and a Japanese military cap during a History class, causing outrage and accusations of glorifying Japanese militarism. #China #Japão #Militarismo (translated)

**Putin wants Trump and Xi to help him divide Ukraine.** **Putin proposes a summit with Trump and Xi to discuss an agreement on Ukraine** *Zelensky would not be included in the proposed negotiations, as the Russian leader seeks to negotiate an end to the war on terms favorable to Moscow.* The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, proposed that he, President Trump, and Chinese leader Xi Jinping meet next month to talk about Ukraine, in an attempt to negotiate an end to the four-year conflict on terms favorable to Moscow, according to people familiar with the discussions. The plan represents Putin's effort to capitalize on the rapprochement between Trump and the Russian leader, which has alarmed Ukraine and its allies in Washington and Europe. A summit of this kind — without the participation of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — would be unprecedented and trigger alarms in European capitals and elsewhere. ## What's at stake The proposal would reportedly take place on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Shenzhen, China, on November 18–19. Putin is said to have floated the idea in a phone call with Trump on October 9; Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed that talks about a possible meeting are underway, but without an agenda or agreement defined. The central point is not just "ending the war": it's **who decides the future of Ukraine**. Excluding Zelensky — and, implicitly, the European Union — would transform peace into an agreement among powers over territory, security, and spheres of influence, rather than negotiations with the invaded country. ## Critique of Putin Putin is trying to convert the invasion into a negotiation of great powers. By proposing a sort of "new Yalta," he seeks three gains: to legitimize Russia's territorial gains, to divide Western allies, and to present Russia as an equal partner to the U.S. and China. His logic is cynical: a country that launched an aggressive war wants the victims and European neighbors to be mere objects of decision. Any "peace" shaped without Kyiv will have little legitimacy and low chances of lasting because Ukraine will continue to have the capacity and will to resist. ## Critique of Trump Trump may not have accepted the summit yet, but his reluctance to immediately refuse is dangerous. By leaving the door open for a meeting without Zelensky, he risks validating Putin's premise: that Ukraine's fate can be resolved by Washington, Moscow, and Beijing. There is also a serious contradiction: Trump presents himself as the man capable of "ending the war," but a hasty peace that rewards aggression would not be peace — it would be a pause that encourages the next invasion. And the report of a potential agreement on Russian diesel, arising in the same conversation, reinforces the perception that economic and personal interests may weigh more than European security. ## Critique of Xi Xi stands to gain a lot by accepting to host or mediate: it places China at the center of the reorganization of European security without bearing the cost of war. However, his neutrality is fictitious; Beijing maintained close economic and political ties with Moscow during the invasion and has an interest in weakening American influence in Europe. If Xi participates in a format that excludes Ukraine, he will cease to be a mediator and become a co-author of a geopolitical arrangement. This would be especially serious for Central and Eastern European countries, which view the defense of Ukraine as a matter of principle and their own security. ## The decisive test A conference can only be legitimate if it includes Ukraine as a participant with full veto rights and involves the European partners who finance and support its defense. Without this, it is not diplomacy: it is an attempt to **divide influence at the expense of a sovereign country**. https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/putin-floats-a-summit-with-trump-and-xi-to-de (translated)

The profile Só Quem é LULA 2026 stated that ICL Notícias had reported that Daniel Vorcaro, the owner of Banco Master, paid R$ 10 million per year to CNN and demanded to approve the questions before interviews. According to the profile, executives from the channel frequently asked for money, and an executive from Master allegedly described CNN as a recurring source of money requests. The author also accused CNN of giving space to Roberta Luchsinger to make accusations against Lula and Lulinha without presenting evidence, documents, or facts. It was stated that Vorcaro financed the channel and that Flávio traveled by private jet with him and negotiated millions with Banco Master. In the profile's assessment, Roberta's interview was not journalism but a service rendered; it also claimed that CNN charged instead of interviewing. The publication also mentioned the hashtags #DebateNaBand, #UmaSemanaParaOTetra, #AtoPelaDemocracia, #ElesPoderiamEstarVivos, and #VacinaSalvaVidaBolsonaroTira, in addition to Haddad, Roberta Luchsinger, Lulinha, Ministry of Prosperity, Pablo Marçal, Marcelo Aguiar, Collor, Nexus, PoderData, Bolsonaro, and Globo, in a series of references to topics and people that, according to the author, appeared in the debate or trends. In the end, it requested that the content be shared before it disappeared. #CNN #Imprensa #Jornalismo (translated)

The Housing Movement distanced itself from the threats made during a protest regarding the house of Prime Minister Luís Montenegro, with the group's lawyer stating that they do not support this type of behavior and emphasizing that the movement is public and open to free expression, while the Prime Minister said he understands the protesters' outrage but denied having made accusations of selfishness against them. #Manifestação #Habitação #Portugal (translated)

Lawyer Tiago Machado, representative of the Movement for Housing, clarified that the threats made during a demonstration do not reflect the position of the group, which distances itself from any incitement to violence, while Prime Minister Luís Montenegro commented on the troubling statements of a protester, reaffirming the right to indignation and solidarity with the protests. #Habitação #Manifestação #Portugal (translated)

I understand the people's indignation on the street, but I also make an appeal: express your indignation, but seek to respect democratic rules and the right to protest, because the right to protest also implies respecting public order and security. José Luís Carneiro criticized again the decision of the Government, Chega, and IL to approve the new rental law. #DireitoÀHabitação #Manifestações #JustiçaSocial (translated)

The Housing Movement distanced itself from threats made during a demonstration against the prime minister, reaffirming that it does not support violent behavior and defending the right to peaceful protest, while Luís Montenegro expressed concern about the situation and reiterated that he respects the citizens' right to indignation. #Manifestações #DireitosHumanos #Habitação (translated)

"This prime minister and this government only work when pushed. It took the indignation of citizens for the government to decide only now to open the inquiry by IGAI into the events that took place in Porto," said José Luís Carneiro in a statement sent to the Lusa agency. #Manifestações #DireitoDeManifestação #Polícia (translated)