Search

The HIFK ice hockey team has undergone a significant change following Tommi Miettinen's appointment as head coach, which has resulted in three consecutive victories and greatly improved the team's performance, as expert Karri Kivi commented, one of the best ever. #HIFK #SMliiga #urheilu (translated)

The writer praised the election results of the previous day and claimed that the student movement had toppled the government, which was considered corrupt in Serbia. Regarding Brazil, he wrote that the leftist Lula had won. Additionally, he wished a good morning and a nice week. #vaalit #politiikka #opiskelijaliike #RS #BR (translated)

Henri Vanhanen wrote that in the United States, Russia was understood more than its own allies, in his opinion. He assessed that Hillary Clinton's words from ten years ago had gained new weight. Vanhanen reminded of the 2018 Helsinki summit, where Trump, in his view, appeared to trust Vladimir Putin's assurances more than the U.S. intelligence community's assessments of Russia's interference in the presidential elections. Vanhanen wrote that Russia had actively sought to promote Trump's victory in the same elections. According to Vanhanen, U.S. Russia policy changed after Trump's return: Russia was once again brought to the center of great power diplomacy, and Washington sought normalization of relations as well as economic arrangements. He also pointed out that the United States voted in 2025 at the UN against a resolution concerning Ukraine alongside Russia and that Putin was welcomed with a red carpet at the Alaska summit while Russia's invasion war continued. Vanhanen assessed that Russia had benefited from political decisions made during Trump's presidency and wrote that the United States was ready to pressure Ukraine. He wondered why Trump spoke warmly of Putin, who in Washington defined the direction of Russia policy, and why Trump occasionally showed more understanding to Putin than to his allies. According to Vanhanen, these decisions could no longer be explained as mere individual blunders or the president's unpredictability. #Trump #Venäjä #Yhdysvallat (translated)

Mikael Lith wrote that the former chair of the SDP, Antti Rinne, supported the party's vice chair Nasima Razmyar's immigration policy. Lith claimed that Razmyar opposed all tightening of immigration and wanted to return to the immigration policy of Marin's time. According to him, the SDP's electoral victory would give the party's left wing, which he included Rinne and Razmyar, the opportunity to dictate Finland's immigration policy, which he described as destructive. https://t.co/npEDhvfuEC #maahanmuutto #SDP #politiikka (translated)

Saara Huhtasaari assessed that Ukraine could not win the war and that this should have been clear as early as 2022. She considered supporting the war foolish from the beginning and wrote that hundreds of billions had been spent on Ukraine while corruption and abuses in military procurements continued. According to her, the money had disappeared and politicians had become richer. Huhtasaari believed that Trump's diesel agreement would not change the outcome of the war, claiming that Ukraine would lose regardless. She blamed the West for maintaining a narrative for four years that victory would require only more weapons and time. In her opinion, this was a war of attrition, in which Russia was enduring better and Ukraine's personnel reserves were dwindling. #Ukraina #sota #historia (translated)

Mikko Vuorenpää wrote that he did not intend to show mercy to the students he called his enemies. In the badminton tournament for law students from Lapland, he planned to defeat each of his opponents with a judo ippon. He also wished everyone a good morning. #opiskelu #sulkapallo #voitto (translated)