Search

The author r00t🇪🇺 accused Bogucki of selective representation of the Constitutional Tribunal's ruling from December 3, 2015, in case K 34/15. He pointed out that Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution entrusts the Sejm with the election of judges of the Tribunal, while the obligation to take an oath before the President results from the law. He referred to points 8.5.1, 8.5.3, and 8.6 of the justification. As he wrote, the Tribunal considered the oath to be an element added by the legislator to the constitutional procedure, and its acceptance by the President was regarded as an obligation. He added that the Tribunal questioned the interpretation of provisions that would not foresee the immediate taking of an oath. The author assessed that the President does not approve the choice made by the Sejm and cannot, based on statutory competence, co-decide on the composition of the Tribunal. He accused Bogucki of omitting parts of the ruling and using it to provoke opposition to the government and to present its actions as an attack on the constitutional order. Referring to Karol Nawrocki, the author reminded that Article 126, paragraph 1 of the Constitution defines the President of the Republic of Poland as the highest representative of the state and the guarantor of continuity of power, while paragraph 3 indicates that he performs his tasks on the principles specified in the Constitution and laws. He wrote that using the authority of the Constitution to justify a political position does not correspond to those obligations. #Konstytucja #Prawo #Polityka (translated)

Waldemar criticized the statements about the constitutional crisis and the possibility of the state being taken over by Czarzasty. He argued that the constitution provides that in case the president is unable to act, his duties are performed by the Marshal of the Sejm, and reminded that Nawrocki had previously expressed a similar position. According to Waldemar, Berek and the others took an oath because the president refused, and the Venice Commission allowed for other solutions when the president blocks actions. The author pointed out that the opponents of this decision used offensive terms and referred to the "strength of the nation." Przydacz, as Waldemar reported, raised the alarm that the Constitutional Tribunal might soon declare Nawrocki unfit to perform his duties. Waldemar assessed that the critics reacted with panic because they were losing control over the Tribunal, which they had treated as their property for years. He added that it was not Czarzasty who abdicated or was lost, but his opponents who had weakened the Tribunal for years and were now screaming about succession and the use of force. He appealed for them to apply the constitution regardless of whether its provisions suited them. #Konstytucja #Polska #Prawo (translated)

Michał Fiszer wrote that his income came from military pension, lectures, articles, and occasional assignments such as translations. He added that readers could also support him by buying him coffee. In response to questions about who pays him, he suggested that similar questions should be directed to those praising Russia, among other things, about how they exchange rubles or whether they receive payments in cryptocurrencies. Fiszer estimated that a significant portion of society is susceptible to manipulation. He wrote that about one third, and possibly more, believe in the theory of the Smolensk crash, and 10 percent believe in the existence of a Jewish world government with a secret bunker under Sworne Gacie. He also mentioned people who believe in the harmfulness of vaccines, a flat Earth, or chemtrails, as well as confusing agencies that arose in the Third Republic with institutions from the times of the People's Republic of Poland. He stated that as a lecturer, he is subject to lustration, and his declaration of not cooperating with the services of the People's Republic of Poland has never been questioned. He also wrote that the only party he belonged to was the UPR. Fiszer reiterated the call to rely on information from the president and his office, the prime minister and his office, the Ministry of National Defense, the National Security Bureau, the military, the General Staff, the commands of the armed forces, the police, border guards, and the fire service, as well as the Military Counterintelligence Service, the Internal Security Agency, and the Intelligence Agency in matters related to state security incidents. He also encouraged reliance on science, scientists from reputable universities, and scientific journals. He announced that he expects an attack from internet trolls, and then intends to write about the anti-aircraft guns ZU-23-2 used in Poland and their derivatives, including the Pilica system. In a note, he corrected that in his previous post he referred to a powered paraglider, not an unpowered paraglider. #Bezpieczeństwo #Dezinformacja #Nauka (translated)

All actions that will be taken in a forceful manner, and not only, will have the character of criminal activities. This is either a direct violation of rights or a systemic coup d'état that may be carried out against a constitutional body, stated Jacek Ozdoba from PiS. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polityka #Sędziowie (translated)

Damage to the Leipzig/Halle airport fence caused most likely by a vehicle, along with ongoing police actions related to suspicious incidents connected to a failed terrorist attack involving a Latvian linked to Russian intelligence, highlight the increasing security threat at German airports. #Lipsk #ataki #GRU (translated)

The author noted that he did not want to downplay the riots in France, but reminded that recently in the USA a crowd stormed the Capitol and under the leadership of the current president attempted to carry out a coup. https://t.co/h21abej61C #francja #zamieszki #kapitol (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that Minister Paweł Szefernaker, head of the Cabinet of the President of Poland Karol Nawrocki, spoke during a demonstration in defense of the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal. Szefernaker conveyed thanks to the participants on behalf of the president and stated that Nawrocki intends to uphold the Constitution. Szefernaker accused Donald Tusk's government of destroying the foundations of the state and attempting to subordinate independent institutions to itself. He cited media reports about a team in the Office of the Prime Minister that had prepared 50 cases for the Tribunal in the event of it being taken over by Tusk's people. He also assessed that after taking over public television and the prosecutor's office, the government may seek to take control of the Tribunal, and subsequently the National Bank of Poland, undermining the president's status. The minister pointed out that during Karol Nawrocki's campaign in 2025, his supporters won despite — as he said — pressure and attacks from the state apparatus. In conclusion, he once again thanked the participants of the demonstration for defending the independence of the Tribunal. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Konstytucja #Polska (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that Donald Tusk, his allies, whom he referred to derogatorily, and media associated with the Third Republic were supposed to portray Piotr, who was beaten by the police according to the author, as a criminal, a knife-wielder, and an attacker, while the policewoman with no injuries was presented as injured. He added that they did not publish the recording of the policewoman before the intervention. https://t.co/f6U04jkh8w #prawda #Polska #policja (translated)

Adam Mazguła criticized those protesting in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal, claiming they were manipulated by the politics of PiS and Karol Nawrocki. According to him, the protesters defended abuses related to the Tribunal, which — as he wrote — PiS had previously destroyed and subordinated to party interests. Mazguła reminded that the Constitutional Tribunal consists of 15 judges elected individually by the Sejm for 9 years, according to Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution. He asked why Nawrocki does not accept the oaths of the judges if he does not elect them. He argued that the Tribunal should protect citizens against abuses of power, including from the government of Donald Tusk. The author accused Jarosław Kaczyński, Nawrocki, and the television stations he described as spreading Russian propaganda of inciting protests. He urged Poles not to support — as he put it — political oppression, and encouraged photographing and documenting the participants of the protests. #PrawdąWOczy #WPoczuciuOdpowiedzialności #TarczaWolnościSłowa #BronimyKonstytucji #ŻołnierzGorszegoSortu #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa #ŚwieckośćPaństwa #PrawaKobiet #BronimyKonstytucji #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

z0rr064 wrote that Wojnarowski said on Gozdyra's show that the man attacked by the dogs "was waving a knife." The author claimed that the man will now be presented as a terrorist, and TVN, Kittel, "Gazeta Wyborcza," Cuchnowski, Onet, and Stankiewicz will argue that he was preparing an attack on Tusk. He called Kierwa an alcoholic and used offensive terms towards Wojnarowski and the mentioned journalists. https://t.co/25F0ZCRlMw #Polska #media #polityka (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that the TVN/TVP journalist enthusiastically nodded along to Tusk when he spoke about the coup against the Constitutional Tribunal and the removal of Święczkowski. He suspected that the journalist thought nobody would see it, but he assessed that "almost all of Poland" would now watch the material. He accused her of excessively subservient behavior towards Tusk. https://t.co/vWuKI20zd0 #Tusk #Polska #media (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that the "little dictator from Sopot" was preparing, as he put it, a coup against the president of the Constitutional Tribunal. He deemed the removal of Święczkowski as crucial. Hübner described this person as primitive, and characterized their methods and language as bolshevik. https://t.co/onFzLh5kPA #Polska #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #polityka (translated)

The commentator referred to a statement by Professor Ryszard Piotrowski about Donald Tusk. Piotrowski assessed that the Constitutional Tribunal, which serves as an extension of the government, would be senseless, and the Prime Minister's idea to place "his people" in it would destroy the Tribunal. He also wondered when the European Commission would speak out. The commentator described this situation as an assault on the proper functioning of the Polish state. #Polska #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #DonaldTusk (translated)

Zygfryd Czaban wrote that a retired man in a wheelchair was supposed to have attempted an attack on a certain man, and later a person with a knife in their pocket attacked a policewoman. He ironized that soon a toothless dog in a muzzle would "bite them." https://t.co/FPpW1AtxWs #Polska #bezpieczeństwo #policja (translated)

The author criticized Dubyna's post, accusing him of misrepresenting the division of powers, the competences of the Council of Ministers, the rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal, and the concept of a coup d'état. He wrote that the appointed team analyzing the systemic effects of the court and tribunal rulings did not seize judicial power and had no authority to overturn judgments, change decision-making panels, or issue orders to judges. The author stated that Dubyna referred to Article 190 of the Constitution while omitting the difference between the finality of Constitutional Tribunal rulings and the analysis of their legal effects. He also accused him of failing to take into account the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Xero Flor v. Poland and the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-448/23, which — as he wrote — concerned fundamental irregularities in the functioning of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. The author considered the designation of the appointment of the government analytical team as a coup d'état to be a manifestation of a misunderstanding of the principles of state functioning. He also criticized the comparison of the situation to a totalitarian system, stating that it was historically unfounded and offensive to those repressed by the communist state. He added that the use of capital letters and exclamation marks did not lend any legal or intellectual value to the statements. #prawo #konstytucja #Polska (translated)

The author of the entry assessed that the state acted effectively. He wrote that the 66-year-old, who he claimed was planning an attack on the prime minister, faced nine charges, and an arsenal including explosive devices was found in his apartment. He added that PiS politicians, whom he accused of spreading anarchy, supported by associated media, defended the suspect. #Polska #bezpieczeństwo #prawo #PL (translated)