Search

Pablo Iglesias stated that, although he understood that there were people from Frente Amplio and Sumar who could not stand him, he believed that his analysis of the IU leader's candidacy in Andalusia contained no lies. He maintained that presenting him as number three for Madrid, instead of as number one for Málaga or Seville, reflected that IU did not trust in obtaining a seat in Andalusia. Iglesias said he hoped IU would negotiate with Podemos in Andalusia, following the Valencian and Canary models, and also in territories like Euskadi, Galicia, Asturias, and Murcia. According to him, these agreements were the only option to obtain seats and curb the advance of the right. He accused the leadership of Frente Amplio of preventing agreements in constituencies where unity could provide options and claimed that they had prioritized weakening Podemos in exchange for senators that PSOE offered them on their lists. He also pointed out that Podemos had incorporated Gabriel Rufián into the national campaign, which, in his opinion, would have benefited the shared candidacies with Podemos or ERC. He added that the lack of agreements in Madrid or Catalonia would have little effect on the final result and would allow the leaders of Más Madrid and Comuns to gain visibility, without being overshadowed by Rufián and Irene Montero. According to Iglesias, since there were no primaries, no one would have had to subordinate their leadership to that of another person. Iglesias argued that those who designed the strategy of Frente Amplio were not seeking to defeat the right, but to destroy Podemos and secure senators to obtain financial stability in light of their debts. He stated that they would achieve neither and that they would not succeed in the second if Vox and PP reached an agreement in the Senate. He concluded by saying that, no matter what happened, it was clear who was needed in Congress. #PolíticaEspañola #IzquierdaUnida #Podemos (translated)

Political Analysis stated, citing Metrópoles, that the STF would have been threatened by the Centrão to interrupt the trial regarding the corruption of the amendments. According to the publication, lawmakers reportedly said that if Dino continued, they would place the far-right in the presidency of the Senate to promote his impeachment and that of other ministers. #STF #Corrupção #Política (translated)

Borja Sémper, national spokesperson for the PP, justifies the negotiations with Vox for the Senate by considering them necessary to ensure a change in Spain ahead of the elections on November 29, which he describes as the most important since the Transition. #PP #Vox #EleccionesGenerales2026 (translated)

The article analyzes the importance of the block unity in the Senate elections on November 29, highlighting how the absolute majority of the PP has influenced the legislature and the strategies of the parties to prevent the left from controlling the Upper House. #EleccionesSenado #UnidadDeBloque #PP (translated)

The author criticized some statements by Feijóo regarding the challenge that keeping "sanchismo" out of the Senate posed for the PP. He interpreted that Feijóo was advocating to exclude the party that was then governing from that chamber through democratic elections and pointed out that this position coincided with that of Vox. #Feijóo #Senado #Democracia #ES (translated)

Rick Azevedo wrote that Flávio Bolsonaro told the public that he would not revoke the end of the 6x1 shift, but had allegedly told allies and businessmen that he intended to overturn the PEC if elected. Azevedo questioned who Bolsonaro was lying to and suggested it could be to the friends who lent jets to the senator. https://t.co/4iRIPISQs9 #FlávioBolsonaro #Política #Eleições2024 (translated)

Janoninho questioned why Flávio Bolsonaro would have stepped down from his position in the Senate to defend a man that the author labeled as the murderer of a 5-year-old child. He also asked what the connection between the two would be and what Flávio might be trying to hide, and requested the lifting of confidentiality related to the Ana Clara case. #ExplicaOCasoAnaClaraFlavio #AbreOSigiloFlavio #FlávioBolsonaro #Justiça #Politica (translated)

Fábio Talhari predicted that the days until Sunday, the 25th, would be intense, contrary to what he claimed to have seen in right-wing profiles and in news reports, as well as accounts he heard and read. He stated that sectors of the left and Lula's allies were resentful about the debate, which they considered unfavorable to them. Talhari also claimed that a narrative about a supposed new investigation against Flávio Bolsonaro, linked to an episode involving Willer Tomaz, a friend of the senator, was being orchestrated. According to him, the case was randomly assigned to Alexandre de Moraes. The author said he was writing about the investigation and predicted that the topic would fuel discussions on social media in the following days. He described the impending competition as intense and expressed support for Flávio Bolsonaro's candidacy for the Presidency of Brazil in 2026. #PolíticaBrasileira #EsquerdaEDireita #DebatePolítico (translated)

Alberto Núñez Feijóo, leader of the PP, has confirmed negotiations with Vox to unify candidacies for the Senate and prevent the left from controlling the Upper House, stating that they are working with discretion and respect before the deadline of October 26. #AlbertoNúñezFeijóo #PP #Vox (translated)

Alberto Núñez Feijóo has confirmed that the PP is in talks with Vox for the Senate elections, warning that facilitating control to Sanchez's government would be a mistake and suggesting the possibility of giving up regional senators in exchange for Vox not running in certain provinces. #Elecciones2026 #PP #Vox (translated)

EL ESPAÑOL reported, in a news article signed by Íñigo Zulet, that the PP was willing to listen to an offer from Vox to neutralize the pact between the PSOE and the Broad Front in the Senate, and that there was a deadline of six days. https://t.co/qxglfB4xjL #Política #España #Senado (translated)