Search

I understand that you are not an economist, but after all, you have an entire army of "advisors" at your disposal... Because this is no longer information relayed by Moody. This is your RHETORIC. Just like with the debt. "In four years, the government increases debt by a trillion." The thing is, four years have not yet passed 🤷‍♂️ You are already linking the executed debt with a FUTURE FORECAST and then dividing that amount by the number of residents, announcing that a newborn has "26 thousand zł of debt." How do you come to such absurd conclusions?? I won't say it's not impressive... But public debt is not a personal obligation that is assigned to a child's account. And then there's the Constitutional Tribunal. You sign a law, still consider it unconstitutional, and send it to the Tribunal. The same Tribunal that the ECtHR has found to violate the right to a court set by law in the Xero Flor case, and the Grand Chamber of the CJEU in case C-448/23 stated that it does not meet the requirement of an independent and impartial court due to serious irregularities concerning its composition. And just minutes earlier, you said: "I'm not looking at legal loopholes." The Constitution and the legality of state organs are not "legal loopholes," Mr. Guardian of the Constitution 🤦‍♂️ And in the end, you say that you don't want "constant political war"... After a speech in which words fall: - blackmail, - the government’s ATM, - the government's financial catastrophe, - the prime minister's political plan and unsubstantiated claims that the government deliberately maintains high fuel prices to profit from them. I won't judge intentions. I assess the content. And the content of the official statement by the person holding the highest office in the state should withstand confrontation with documents 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Here - in many key areas - it does not withstand. I will no longer dwell on this speech, as I believe it is a waste of time. I'll just say this. I don't know who prepared this text for you. However, I do know that you read it, you delivered it, and you take responsibility for every word. And you repeated nonsense and manipulations that have long circulated in the statements of people from your Chancellery — which I have already corrected multiple times. The worst part is that many of them don't even take long to verify. You just need to open the documents from your own Chancellery. I really don't envy you. It only pains me your slogan: "First Poland, first Poles." Because Poland and Poles should truly come first - even before political interests, party narratives, and the need for another conflict. You cannot appeal to the good of citizens while simultaneously playing with their trust in the state, providing them from the highest office with half-truths, insinuations, and political assessments cloaked as facts. This is not about whether someone likes this government. It's about accountability for words. Especially from this office 🫣 (translated)

The President of the European Central Bank (ECB) Christine Lagarde said on Monday that higher energy prices increase the risk of inflation in the eurozone. During a hearing of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament in Brussels, Lagarde said that (translated)

"I personally don't know anyone with 100 thousand euros in the bank." Heinen appeared somewhat surprised by the widespread opposition, as he was under the impression that he had already spared the 'small saver and investor' by setting the tax-free threshold at 1,000 euros. (translated)

I just saw the debate between @MPHoogeveen and @Stas_Financien about the difference in taxation between directly held bitcoin, in a wallet or on an exchange (capital gains tax), and bitcoin through an investment product at a bank or broker (wealth tax). @Stas_Financien states that crypto cannot be included in the amendment, because the existing exception for start-ups and scale-ups can only be extended to other securities. But is that really true?! An amendment is a legislative proposal with which you can modify and/or supplement another legislative proposal. The fact that there is currently no exception for crypto (and precious metals) does not automatically mean that you cannot add one. If speed is the reason to accept that difference, then concretely justify why direct crypto/precious metals cannot be included in time. My question would be: What concrete legal provision makes it impossible for crypto/precious metals to be included in the same amendment? Saying "that exception was not included yet" is not sufficient. It didn't exist for start-ups either, but was also added. Think of an addition for regulated institutions, exchanges, or brokers that have a license or AFM permit. (translated)

A few days ago, the collection of proposals for the Youth Word of the Year 2026 started. Theoretically, the jury chooses them from all the proposals. After publishing this map in August, I received hundreds of comments like "now everyone says that" from young people outside my bubble of followers. (translated)

In connection with the investigation into allegations of money laundering, Jana Hoňková, a non-partisan member of ODS, withdrew her candidacy in Líbeznice, while her husband, a former manager of VZP, is being investigated for making 162 bank deposits totaling over 26 million crowns. (translated)

Over 11 thousand zlotys was spent on a cruise on the Vistula River by the Constitutional Tribunal of Bogdan Święczkowski as part of the celebration of the 40th anniversary of this institution. The party, costing tens of thousands of zlotys, included catering services and medals. "Ball on Święczkowski's Titanic" details in the program "News Michalskiego" on @tvn24plus. (translated)

The VVD destroys the crypto and precious metals sector. The cabinet pushes investors in gold & bitcoin towards ETFs at banks and brokers. At the expense of entrepreneurs in crypto and precious metals. "It's just until 2030" as a sweetener. No guarantee that this will succeed. (translated)

It is a unique form of moral bankruptcy: the most prominent comedian in the country is invited as an expert to the state parliament on the ban of the AfD – and justifies a ban that would take around 40 percent of the voters in Thuringia away from their party with National Socialism. (translated)

Unpopular opinion: I am utterly convinced that yesterday's freak show in the Thuringian State Parliament made a ban on the AfD even less likely than before. What was pulled out of thin air was simply a declaration of bankruptcy. (translated)