Search

Anne reported that Bocellari had said he did not consider it possible that it was about a 40. He had thanked Sempio's defense for what he called a possible assist, but had mentioned wanting to courteously send it back to the sender. Anne added that the "climbing on mirrors" was of no use. #mattino5 #garlasco https://t.co/N3buXHK4DO #mattino5 #garlasco #politica (translated)

Mattino5 reported that lawyer Bocellari, speaking about the defense consultations of Sempio, said that his interest was the truth, not the evidence in favor of Stasi. The program was live on Canale5 and streaming on Mediaset Infinity. https://t.co/qvdyohL4aY #Garlasco #Giustizia #Verità (translated)

Gianluca Zanella clarified that his intervention was an assessment, not a piece of news, and stated that he was struck by the change in Andrea Sempio's defense line. He recalled that the previous week, on Porta a Porta, Sempio had not expressed doubts about Stasi's guilt, while from the day before, according to Zanella, they were discussing the fingerprint as an element that, for Taccia and Cataliotti, would have helped Stasi in the review and exonerated Sempio. Zanella also referred to a preview by Bocellari and the statements by Linarello, again on Porta a Porta, about new elements he described as shocking in the files of the Ris of Parma. He noted that, in addition to the bicycle pedals, the fingerprint would be another significant piece of evidence against Stasi, especially highlighted in the Testi report and still central to the conviction sentence. He then speculated that the next revelation might actually concern the footprints. #Garlasco #Giustizia #Processo #Impronte (translated)

Beautiful wrote that lawyer Taccia, commenting on the insult directed by Capra at Giletti, had said that everyone was stressed during that period and that, in the context of defenses, sometimes people went out of line. The author added that she had never seen Bocellari and De Rensis behave like Taccia and Capra. #garlasco #commento #giustizia #attualità (translated)

Lia Bencivenga criticized the statements made by the consultant for the injured party, calling them embarrassing and irrational, and reported that he had spoken of his own notes. She also recalled the lawyer Bocellari's claims about other evidence that, according to him, would have been found in the RIS laboratories. Bencivenga argued that the material in the consultant's possession should be obtained through a search and that he should be summoned to the prosecutor's office. She stated that this was necessary for Alberto, Chiara, and the citizens, and accompanied the post with accusatory hashtags related to the Garlasco case. #CRIMINALI #GARLASCO #GIUSTIZIA #VERITÀ #DIRITTI (translated)

Fabiana wrote that lawyer Bocellari had announced the previous evening the imminent release of another piece of information, which she described as very serious, related to the RIS laboratory from 2007. She added that shortly after, Professor Linarello had published a photo on his Facebook profile and claimed that the two events were not a coincidence. #Garlasco #Garlasco https://t.co/GnND9zxLYy #Giustizia #Garlasco #Notizie (translated)

Francesco wrote that Bocellari was examining four files that, according to him, had been hidden for 19 years in the archives of the RIS of Parma. He claimed that, in addition to elements related to saliva and blood that were unassigned or resulted absent on the pedals, Bocellari had identified other serious irregularities, one of which was comparable to the cases of the teaspoon and the pedals. He added that many people would be shaking. #Garlasco #RIS #giustizia (translated)

The account clinicapschiatricamainagioia wrote that lawyer Bocellari would have been at Quarta Repubblica and that De Rensis would have had a confrontation with an unspecified person at Lo stato delle cose, in relation to Garlasco. #garlasco #quartarepubblica #lostatodellecose #garlasco (translated)

The author wrote that Bocellari was the only one to have specified that she had not yet finished reading the retrieved files. He added that the others had already read them in 24 hours, claiming that it was "all smoke." #garlasco #mattino5 #garlasco #mattino5 #politica (translated)

Anne reported that Federica had asked how much weight the matter regarding the review would carry and that Bocellari had defined it as a decisive circumstance, capable of disintegrating the conviction and evident to anyone. Anne argued that this time even the "clique" would not be able to distort the facts. The post was accompanied by the hashtags #mattino5 and #garlasco. #mattino5 #garlasco #giustizia #sentenza #politica (translated)

Elisabetta Sionis, a clinical criminologist, wrote that the latest news on the Garlasco case concerned events that would have taken place in 2007. She added that lawyer Bocellari had hinted at a documentary evidence related to another period, which in her opinion would have caused a stir, and said she was waiting confidently. #notizie #Giustizia #Garlasco (translated)

Luca Azzola reported that Giada Bocellari, a few days earlier, had said that Dr. Garofano was not aware of the entire file and should wait before expressing himself. Bocellari had added that she was aware of other documents that he had not seen, but did not want to reveal them because she hoped he would intervene again. #garlasco #Garlasco #Giustizia #Verità (translated)

Gianluca Zanella wrote that, based on the words of Giada Bocellari reported by Ansa, the news regarding Alberto Stasi's position would not concern 2007. He hypothesized that the events of 2016/2017 rather involved Andrea Sempio and that, by exclusion, the upcoming news could refer to the period 2014/2015, between the retrial and the Supreme Court. He added that, in his opinion, the "Pandora's box" was now open and that all that remained was to wait for further revelations. #Garlasco #Giustizia #Processo #Garlasco (translated)

Elisabetta Aldrovandi argued that the review of the trial should demonstrate Alberto Stasi's innocence, rather than just raise doubts about the sufficiency of the evidence that had led to his conviction. She stated that Stasi had been unjustly convicted because, in her opinion, he had not killed Chiara Poggi. Aldrovandi added that the positions of her colleagues Bocellari and De Rensis, and not just theirs, were clear. #garlasco #giustizia #innocenza #verità (translated)

The author of the post cited Giada Bocellari, according to whom Stasi's defense had other elements at its disposal, one of which, in her opinion, would have caused particular uproar, even though it did not concern the investigations of 2007. She added that they were ready and addressed her interlocutors with a provocative invitation to give up, in the context of the Garlasco case. #Garlasco https://t.co/HRVcd7Y44s #Giustizia #Garlasco #Processo (translated)

Stories of Justice, referring to a post by Albina Perri on Facebook, wrote that Garofano, during a SIT, had said that he had probably warned Muscio and had not seen anything else after the 19th. He contrasted these statements with what Garofano would have said the evening before on TV: that Muscio had been warned by Marino and that he, like everyone else, had seen everything after the 19th. The author added that during the SIT Garofano was required to tell the truth and that otherwise, it would have been false testimony. He also reported that lawyer Bocellari had hoped he would continue to speak and that the television statements were also being noted by the Prosecutor's Office. #Garlasco #Giustizia #FalsaTestimonianza #Garlasco (translated)