Very strange what happened here. Jimmy Dijk (SP) requested, as announced on Thursday, an interpellation debate about the scrapping of the increase in the own risk, because two parties accidentally (?) voted incorrectly and the outcome could turn out differently. If even Wilders stands up for you and appeals to the courtesy of other members of parliament, then something is really going on. Kati Piri confirms Wilders' words. Keijzer also briefly explains why it should at least be scheduled this week. But unfortunately, it has not been able to help. And here the chairman also nicely shows again why he should be called 'VVD chairman.' Because it is the VVD that wants to raise the own risk and this interpellation debate will produce an outcome that goes against that wish. Dirty how this is being played. (translated)
