Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

Susanne wrote that NU.nl proposed Laura Faber as an ordinary citizen in an article about people taking in status holders, without mentioning her work in the reception and integration of newcomers, according to her. Susanne called Faber the director of Bureau de Werkvloer, a teacher at PONT | Zorg & Sociaal, project leader for the Development of Municipal Reception at the municipality of Hengelo, and founder of the integration school and language school Iedereen aan Boord in Deventer. According to Susanne, Faber's income came 100% from projects and assignments that were directly related to refugee reception and the integration of newcomers and status holders. Susanne called the portrayal misleading and wrote that she had submitted a community note. According to her, it was ready for review and would only become visible to everyone after enough reviews. She thanked Hilda Spruit for her response under the article and provided two sources. https://t.co/htqtVhSm1c https://t.co/4GI1TXQwZR #journalistiek #vluchtelingen #integratie (translated)

Susanne wrote that the performance of D66 member Heera Dijk had been mentioned in De Telegraaf, in an article titled 'Amateurism strikes in the House of Representatives'. According to Susanne, the clip had not been noticed by a journalist, but became known after she downloaded it and it was subsequently shared widely. According to her, it was recorded during the second round of a budget debate, at a late time when hardly anyone was watching. Susanne argued that the press had been too focused on protecting the current coalition. If the same had happened under the Schoof cabinet, talk shows would have covered it extensively, in her opinion. She wrote that the Jetten cabinet displayed even more amateurism, but that the established press failed to adequately cover this. Susanne called for another article about what she referred to as amateurism in parliamentary journalism. #Journalistiek #amateurisme #KabinetJetten #Journalistiek #amateurisme #TweedeKamer (translated)

Susanne wrote that she was watching the press conference, where Yesilgöz spoke instead of Jetten. She accused Yesilgöz of believing her own lies and overwhelming journalists with nonsense. According to Susanne, the press no longer seemed to accept the optimistic VVD communication outright and the questions were sharper than she was used to. She thought that this critical attitude should have come ten years earlier, but she called it better late than never. #Persconferentie #KabinetJetten #Journalistiek #TweedeKamer #Persconferentie #Journalistiek #VVD (translated)

Susanne wrote that her observation might cost her followers, but she found the FVD members of parliament to act more constructively in debates than those of DENK. She based that judgment on her long-term observation of debates and said it was separate from her views on the positions of both parties. According to her, FVD wanted to get rid of the cabinet as quickly as possible, while DENK could live with it. #MijnMening #TweedeKamer #Debat #Politiek #Observatie (translated)

Susanne reacted to a statement made by Hilde Wendel that general practitioners were free for everyone. She wrote that patients do not pay a deductible for general practitioner care, but that this does not mean that the care is free, and she sarcastically asked if she could then cancel her health insurance. #BegrotingVWS #TweedeKamer #Zorg #Huisartsen #Verzekering (translated)

Susanne wrote that, according to her, there was a taboo on discussing disadvantaged families who had many children and consequently needed financial support and care disproportionately often. She stated that this was increasing, in her view, due to migration from countries where large families were a strong cultural and social norm. Susanne said she did not know if anything could be done about it, but believed that the problem should be discussable; according to her, this apparently was not happening in politics. #BegrotingVWS #TweedeKamer #Zorg #Migratie #Gezin (translated)

Susanne reported that Lientje (BBB) had asked questions to VVD Minister Van Weel about what she referred to as Hamas veneration in various places in the Netherlands on October 7. She referred to CJO from October 8, 2026. #vragenuur #TweedeKamer https://t.co/yP6eXmxeyv #TweedeKamer #politiek #vragen (translated)

Susanne wrote that Van der Plas was quite angry with VVD minister Van Weel. According to her, Van der Plas thought the minister had opinions on everything, but did nothing. Susanne suspected that Van Weel would have received a motion of no confidence against him if motions could be submitted during the question hour. #TweedeKamer #vragenuur #politiek #Nederland #TweedeKamer (translated)

Susanne referred to a question from Henk Vermeer (BBB) about the plan to abolish the deduction for specific healthcare costs. According to her, Vermeer asked why the average deduction for people with an income above €100,000 was €10,385, while it was on average around €1,300 to €1,400. Susanne wrote that she would also like to know the answer. #Belastingplan2027 #TweedeKamer #Zorgkosten #Belasting #TweedeKamer (translated)

Susanne wrote that public money for representatives, in her opinion, was not intended for the situation she referred to. She asked others not to say that members of parliament were paid for it and said that she was generally critical, but that evening she had to deal with them. #TweedeKamer #TweedeKamer #politiek #belasting (translated)

Susanne wrote that it was very annoying for a Member of Parliament to be on their way home or just at home after a heavy work week on Thursday after 8:00 PM and then receive a request to immediately return to the House of Representatives for a roll call vote on a rainbow flag. #TweedeKamer #Politiek #Regenboogvlag #Wetgeving (translated)

Susanne wrote that she had to laugh at a budget debate in which Tijs van den Brink (CDA) unintentionally embarrassed Heera Dijk (D66) according to her. Dijk had said she was happy that financial coverage had been found, but according to Susanne, she could not explain what that coverage consisted of. She wrote that Ingrid Michon, whom she referred to as VVD president, came to Dijk's aid and that VVD minister Van der Burg laughed off the discomfort. Susanne called that partisan and compared the performance of D66 and the VVD in a mocking manner. #BegrotingKoninkrijksrelaties #TweedeKamer #TweedeKamer #Politiek #Humor (translated)

Susanne wrote that she received similar responses almost daily and that her energy and motivation were decreasing. She described the cabinet as very harmful and characterized the D66 Prime Minister as incompetent and lacking leadership qualities. According to her, nothing was changing and the opposition offered her little support. She stated that parliamentary journalism continued to fall short: in her view, too much information about the cabinet was not shared with the public and many journalists lacked dossier knowledge or connection with right-wing voters to ask the right questions. Susanne wrote that she found national politics just as bad as many of her followers did, and she would prefer to stop. However, since many people relied on her tweets, she wanted to continue for now, but with less enthusiasm. #TweedeKamer #Politiek #Democratie #Oppositie (translated)

Susanne wrote that she was angry with the VVD, which she called the biggest fake party in parliament. She emphasized that she did not mean FVD or PVV and accused the VVD of shirking responsibilities, doing nothing in the interest of the country, and making lying a business model. According to her, more people should be angry. #VVD #KabinetJetten #Boos #Politiek #Nederland (translated)

Susanne wrote that parties that had promised stricter asylum measures, including the distribution law contingent on a lower influx, should be punished if they continued to frustrate those measures. According to her, undermining asylum policy should not pay off. She therefore advised voters not to vote for the VVD, D66, or the CDA any longer. She also stated that asylum policy required a credible cabinet and called the cabinet ineffective, despite the strong rhetoric about punishments for frustrating return. #KabinetJetten #Asielbeleid #Asielbeleid #Politiek #Kiesrecht (translated)

Susanne wrote that she rarely spoke out about Israel, Gaza, and Palestine, but found it remarkable that the D66 prime minister said that Israelis "lost their lives" and that Palestinians were killed. According to her, the first formulation referred more to an accident or illness. She described the events of October 7 as a slaughter and murder. #JustSaying #Israël #Palestina #politiek (translated)

Susanne wrote that the man was talking nonsense in her opinion and that the VVD's tactics had become outdated. She claimed that the public perception was the reason the VVD had been in government for more than 15 years, and described the collaboration between the party's PR machine and the press as unhealthy. According to her, that collaboration should have failed 10 years ago. #media (translated)