Search

Kriska Carvalho stated that, when asking people not to interact, comment, or repost anything, she also wanted them to avoid mentioning the names involved. She noted that many people were mentioning both the broadcaster and the person and questioned whether they still did not know how things worked on Twitter. #TwitterBrasil #Engajamento #Comunicação (translated)

Vitor de Lucca asked people not to watch the video, not to click on the posts, and not to comment on the topic, arguing that interacting with posts from Bolsonaro supporters increased their engagement. He argued that, at that moment, people should direct their interaction towards positive content. #EngajamentoPositivo #LutarContraODiscursoDeÓdio #FocoNoBem (translated)

Biazita Gomes stated that TikTok Brazil had censored videos about national sovereignty and a tutorial to help people find their electoral zones. She also accused the platform of favoring the Bolsonaro family during the week, harming engagement and censoring videos from the progressive camp. #Censura #LiberdadeDeExpressão #SoberaniaNacional (translated)

André Janones stated that the engagement helped build the projection of Nikolas Ferreira. According to him, the algorithm broadened the reach of the content regardless of whether the mentions of the deputy were positive or negative. #Engajamento #NikolasFerreira #Algoritmo (translated)

The author stated that everyone needed to follow the guidance, even those who had no followers, and said that the algorithm would not take that into account. According to him, 30 million posts without likes would be worth more than a post from a famous person with 30 million views. #Algoritmo #RedesSociais #Engajamento #BR (translated)

Thomaz stated that Meta admitted to having restricted the engagement of Lula's account. He considered the situation absurd and argued that the company should compensate for the damage by increasing, from then on, the sponsorship of the president's publications. https://t.co/7a0ZMEiTpL #Lula #Meta #LiberdadeDeExpressão (translated)

Pedro Menin stated that he reviewed a table sent by a follower about 10 elections and 17 run-offs between 1989 and 2026. According to him, in 15 of the 17 cases, or 88%, the official result was more favorable to the opponent of the PT than indicated by the DataFolha polls. Menin noted that in the second round of 1989, the poll was conducted by Ibope. Based on the comparison, he said that in the second rounds, the ballots favored the PT's opponent by an average of 2 points compared to DataFolha. In the first rounds, the average was said to be 4 points in favor of the opponent of the PT candidate. For this year, he stated that the difference was 5 points in favor of Flávio, in line with historical trends. Menin predicted Flávio's victory, with a score between 52 to 48 and 54 to 46, and urged his supporters to maintain their engagement until the end. He also said they could hold him accountable on the 25th and that they would win. #Eleições2026 #PT #EngajamentoCívico (translated)

Thinking About History stated that engagement with lulista posts on Instagram had fallen a bit and urged that the research not reassure supporters. The profile argued that efforts should be doubled in the last week, with more interactions, shares, and conversations with people, and that rest could wait until after October 25. #Engajamento #Eleições2023 #Lula (translated)

GUYS, URGENT ⭐️ 13 stated that the "Lula's Army" aimed to mobilize people on social media, in a manner similar to the digital activities of Bolsonaro supporters, but, according to the author, in a more effective and organic way. He also mentioned that there was confusion about the initiative and unfeasible requests, and that the focus was to engage Lula. #Lula #Mobilização #Engajamento (translated)

Root Banido conservative stated that he would launch the next day a movement that he described as unprecedented and spontaneous, organized by the people. He requested support to publicize the initiative and said that if people followed his guidance, Brazil would be paralyzed that weekend. #Movimento #Engajamento #Brasil (translated)

André Janones thanked Minister Kassio Nunes Marquez for the assistance he received in his office the previous afternoon. According to Janones, the minister listened to his arguments and stated that he would express his opinion in the records. He stated that he disagreed with several decisions made by Nunes Marquez and other ministers, but said he prefers to express his indignation with technical arguments, instead of using his visibility to attack the reputation of judges. Janones stated that ministers are not politicians and have less space to defend themselves publicly. He also said he did not want to reproduce bolsonarism "with the signs reversed" and accused the movement of having spent eight years attacking the Supreme Court and weakening institutions as part of a fascist project. According to him, the ideological division between members of the institutions and the population's opposition to them could lay the groundwork for the end of democracy. Finally, Janones stated that he would move forward until victory on the 25th and pointed to Flávio Nantes Bolsonaro as his opponent. #Justiça #Democracia #Política (translated)

André Janones thanked Minister Kassio Nunes Marquez for his attention in his office the previous afternoon. According to Janones, the minister listened to his arguments and stated that he would express himself in the case files. The author said he disagreed with several decisions made by the magistrate and other ministers, but defended presenting his indignation through technical arguments in the proceedings. Janones stated that he would not use his visibility to attack the reputation of judges for decisions contrary to his interests. He also said that ministers of the Supreme Court should respect their position and remain above political debate, as, according to him, judges do not have the same space to defend themselves as politicians do. He declared that he did not want to reproduce a "Bolsonarism with a swapped signal" and accused the movement of having spent eight years attacking the Supreme Court and turning the population against Justice. Janones stated that weakening institutions would be part of a fascist plan and claimed that ideological division among members of institutions could threaten democracy. Finally, Janones said he would move forward until victory on the 25th and pointed to Flávio Nantes Bolsonaro as the opponent against whom he intended to direct his actions. #Justiça #STF #Democracia (translated)

Roberto Reis stated that he believed they would win, but said that people should also take action. He suggested participating in demonstrations, trying to convince undecided voters, working in WhatsApp groups, demanding engagement from parliamentarians, and reporting fake news and abuses. Reis added that society was mobilizing and questioned whether readers would just be watching. #Mobilização #ParticipaçãoCívica #Engajamento (translated)

Guga Noblat stated that his publications were receiving likes equivalent to 10%, 15%, and even 20% of the views, above the 5% or less that he considered normal. He attributed the increase to a lack of adequate distribution by X and said that, for this reason, only followers would be seeing the content. According to him, a post with 50 thousand views should have reached double or triple the audience. #algoritmo #engajamento #mídiasociais (translated)

Biazita Gomes stated that Meta and other large technology companies would be deliberately censoring progressive content and favoring the engagement of Flávio Bolsonaro's campaign. She attributed this action to the politician's promise to reverse all legislation controlling big techs, including overturning the Civil Internet Framework. #BigTech #Censura #LiberdadeDeExpressão (translated)