Search

Central Reality wrote that the profile Aos Fatos verified statements by Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro in an interview with Globo. According to the publication, nine statements from each were analyzed: two of Lula's were considered incomplete and seven true, while among Flávio Bolsonaro's, two were classified as incomplete, one as true, and six as false. https://t.co/yNLnG3HVYZ #Lula #Bolsonaro #Fatos (translated)

Sérgio Santos shared a statement from Sérgio Malheiros, who identified himself as a Black man and stated that the country was living a decisive moment. Malheiros said he believed in education as a tool for transformation, in the importance of the SUS (Unified Health System), and in the fight against hunger. He also stated that he would vote for number 13 on the 25th because he believed in democracy. https://t.co/6QUrIiMGG8 #FatosImportantes #Educação #Democracia (translated)

Carlos Viana stated that, according to the Politicians' Ranking, which analyzed an interview of Lula with Globo, 29.6% of the president's statements were true, 29.6% false, and 40.8% inaccurate. He said that seven out of ten answers were false or inaccurate and claimed that Lula didn't know if the Bolsa Família had increased, defended Alexandre de Moraes and Andrei Rodrigues, and got confused in the questions about the economy. Viana classified the interview as the beginning of the end for Lula and advocated for the election of Flávio Bolsonaro on the 25th. #Lula #Política #Fatos (translated)

Xico Graziano stated that a Datafolha survey indicated a 2 percentage point difference between Flávio and Lula, although, according to him, the institute's methodology tended slightly to the left. Graziano said that Lula had a 46% rejection rate, compared to 44% for Flávio, and that 41% disapproved of the PT government, while 35% supported it. In the author's assessment, the indices indicated that Lula's electoral influence was discredited and that, without an extraordinary event or a serious mistake by Flávio, it would be difficult for Lula to reverse the scenario. #Eleição2024 #PolíticaBrasil #DataFolha (translated)

UpdateCharts stated that Juliette rebutted false accusations that she received money to record a video in defense of Our Lady Aparecida and said that she only reported facts. According to the publication, the segment had already surpassed 40 million views on Instagram. https://t.co/uTnDeiuw6t #Juliette #Fatos #NossaSenhoraAparecida (translated)

Silva's subway twink questioned whether the stations had been vandalized and wrote that vandalism was unacceptable, regardless of the side involved. He also argued that the facts should be verified before any accusations. https://t.co/NELVH6Qi43 #Vandalismo #Fatos #Justiça (translated)

Juliette asked people not to believe in video edits published on the internet and to watch the complete recording, which she described as responsible, respectful, and true. She stated that it was possible to disagree with the interpretation but not with the facts, and denied that she would receive any payment for doing that. According to Juliette, anyone claiming otherwise would have to prove the accusation, which she classified as a crime. #Internet #Fatos #Responsabilidade (translated)

Rodrigo Constantino stated that the STF was investigating itself under rules defined by the Court itself, requiring the Federal Police to describe facts without issuing a value judgment and submitting the inquiries to the plenary, which would include the ministers mentioned. He said that when investigations turned to the court, the process slowed down, confidentiality was at the discretion of the ministers, and accountability became practically impossible. Constantino also stated that the Constitution did not provide a clear exit if several ministers were investigated or impeded. According to him, while the Master case exposed connections between bankers and power, the court protected its own image and its members. He said that the opposition advocated for impeachment and a CPMI but that the judicial system remained shielded, pointing out Lula's exit as the first step to change this situation. #STF #AtivismoJudicial #Impeachment (translated)

Carlos Bolsonaro questioned the claims that any Brazilian court would favor Flávio Bolsonaro. He compared the conditions and possibilities that, as he wrote, Lula enjoyed with those that the highest court of the Brazilian judiciary would have prevented Jair Bolsonaro from exercising. Carlos said it was necessary to expose the facts to avoid, in his view, that part of the press diverted attention from new abuses by the faction. He also stated that the system would once again try to bring Lula and his organization to power and advocated for a change on the 25th, with Flávio Bolsonaro, number 22. #Justiça #Política #Eleições2022 (translated)

Carlos Bolsonaro described the publication as a public utility news program with information and journalistic facts about a presidential election between Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro. He requested that the content be shared with family and friends so they could draw their own conclusions. #Eleições2022 #Jornalismo #LulaFlavioBolsonaro (translated)

Mario Sabino wrote that a militant from O Globo stated that democracy would be at risk in a possible government of Flávio Bolsonaro and that her assessment was based on facts, not opinion. He added that it was necessary to respect her opinion. #democracia #opinião #FlávioBolsonaro (translated)

Ed Raposo stated that, two weeks before the vote, winning undecided voters required direct and concise communication, with facts, images, videos, and audios, and said that ideology would not guarantee votes during this period. He added that he would continue to do his part, whether elected or not, and pointed to the published video as proof. https://t.co/JaVPZQeExX #Eleições2023 #Política #Voto (translated)

Attention, Vascaínos! It was reported that the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. submitted a statement to the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro on Monday (12) against Vasco's requests. The company requested that the injunction that suspended the authorization for the club to use Maracanã in the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20, be maintained. According to the concessionaire, Vasco had started ticket sales and confirmed the stadium to CONMEBOL after obtaining a favorable decision on October 9, although knowing that it could be reversed. Fla-Flu also alleged that the club continued sales after the suspension of the decision on October 10, and that this conduct worsened the urgency of the case. The company stated that CONMEBOL's deadline to indicate the stadium had been extended until October 13 at 12 PM, and argued that Vasco should use this period to reorganize the match. The concessionaire cited a document from the Military Police dated October 4, which, according to them, acknowledged conditions for the game at Estádio Nilton Santos. They also criticized the recommendation from the Public Ministry in favor of Maracanã, claiming that it did not consider this subsequent document. Fla-Flu further argued that the writ of security was legally appropriate and questioned the favorable decision to Vasco, granted on October 9, claiming that it altered a previous understanding without new facts and by an authority that, in the company's interpretation, did not have the competence to do so. #FlaFlu #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Alfredo Gaspar stated that some allegations were circulating to spread fear and misinformation. He urged people to check the facts and consult reliable sources before sharing content, and encouraged the dissemination of what he called the truth and voting for number 22. https://t.co/0st3pXlmeX #FakesNews #VerifiqueOsFatos #Eleição2022 (translated)

Grêmio Foot-Ball Porto Alegrense reported that it was working to identify the fan involved in a video circulating on social media that denounced an act of racism. The club stated that if the individual was a member, they would be suspended preventively and that an internal ethical process had already been initiated. It also affirmed that it would collaborate with the authorities in the investigation and reiterated its anti-racist commitment and its dedication to a society free of prejudice. #ClubeDeTodos #RacismoNão #Antirracismo #Grêmio (translated)

The Liberal Party stated that Bolsa Família, the Popular Pharmacy, and the SUS continued. The party also accused Lula and the PT of trying to scare the population and said that Brazilians wanted to work, prosper, and have dignity. The party argued that Brazil needed truth, opportunities, and freedom. #BolsaFamilia #Vote22 #OBrasilvaiVencer #BolsaFamilia #Brasil #Liberdade (translated)