Search

The author stated that the synagogue on Burnouf Street in Paris had been vandalized, mentioning prayer books thrown on the ground, premises searched, and a place of worship desecrated. He condemned the return of "horror" and expressed his support for law enforcement. 
#SoutienFDO https://t.co/pkkLrBF9vR… https://t.co/dFkH8BQIhq #Paris #Antisémitisme #Intolérance #FR (translated)

The author said the final part of #arraiolos2026 discussed how fear, anxiety and uncertainty reshape societies, and when intolerance becomes a dangerous political force, with philosopher and sociologist Renata Salecl. The post also began a statement about what politics must be able to do but did not complete it.

Tom Jensen wrote in a leader in Berlingske that the two Muslim participants in last week's episode of the TV 2 program 'Højskolen' had invoked Danish values such as tolerance and inclusiveness to defend views he believed were far from those values. He raised questions about the limits of tolerance in Western democracies and referred to philosopher Karl Popper's argument that open societies must be able to protect themselves against intolerance. Jensen described a growing hatred of the West, which he linked to fundamentalist and dictatorial regimes, as well as people, often from MENAPT countries, who had obtained residency in the West. He wrote that some of them were increasingly allying with a left wing that accepted extreme views when they were expressed by minority representatives. He associated Hamas-apologetic pro-Palestinian demonstrations with parts of the recent unrest in France, growing antisemitism, and opposition to Iran's influence in the Middle East. He also connected the debate to Pia Kjærsgaard's showing of TikTok images of Afrah al-Jabouri in 'Højskolen'. Jensen wrote that free citizens had the right not to tolerate intolerance and warned that the foundation of society could otherwise crack. He concluded by stating that one must tolerate the bad atmosphere. https://t.co/M4FFmI3JqU #Tolerance #Demokrati #Ytringsfrihed (translated)

Fdesouche.com, a news review, reported that in Switzerland, an elderly woman asked a man to speak more quietly on a train. According to the site, the man then called her a racist, threatened to hit her, and tried to prevent her from getting off. https://t.co/pGqZ0209iy https://t.co/vp8LxMOwNK #Suisse #Violence #Intolérance (translated)

Elizabeth Sheppard Sellam estimated that whenever moderates prevailed, their opponents mobilized. She wrote that common sense, nuance, and compromise seemed unbearable to those who thrived on hate and confrontation, and deemed this intolerance worrying and dangerous for democracy. #Démocratie #Intolérance #Compromis (translated)

The author wrote that the history of the Second World War showed how valuable, and how vulnerable, freedom, democracy and human rights could be when intolerance and dictatorship prevailed. They said such horrors must never happen again and that everyone had a responsibility to prevent them. https://t.co/z89dRAMLdz #Liberté #Démocratie #DroitsHumains #LU (translated)

Philippe Geluck, the cartoonist of the Cat, is facing a fierce controversy following his comments on the political preferences of left-wing voters in France, revealing a worrying intolerance within a part of this left that punishes those who stray from its dominant line. #PhilippeGeluck #Politique #Intolérance (translated)

Destination Télé stated that the French were still many watching Pascal Praud at 8 PM, despite what he termed the intolerance of teachers and principals. The account indicated that CNews had gathered 805,000 viewers, BFMTV 337,000, LCI 206,000, and France Info 69,000, with a peak of 1,134,000 viewers at 8:30 PM. https://t.co/aVgiaJS1kL #Télévision #Audiences #Médias (translated)

"Nous constatons que l'agressivité et le climat d'intolérance, propagés principalement par les réseaux sociaux et, malheureusement, par certains politiciens également, empoisonnent littéralement l'espace public et influencent le comportement de nos enfants à l'école"Le président Peter Pellegrini s'est dit "choqué par ce nouveau cas dans lequel un élève a attaqué des enseignants et un camarade de classe". #Slovaquie #ViolenceScolaire #Meurtre

«Et le Verbe s’est fait chair.» La bouleversante beauté de cette image. Qu’on soit chrétien ou non, le rappel de la tradition spécifique de l’Incarnation: Dieu en toute personne humaine. (Cela n’empêche pas de rappeler que la compassion peut être le fait des athées ou d’autres religions, antiques ou actuelles, et que l’Eglise a eu son lot d’intolérance. Mais aussi que ce respect de la personne humaine a inspiré certains des plus courageux mouvements de résistance: la Rose Blanche contre Hitler ou certains mouvements de résistance à Staline, au nom de cette notion.) #Incarnation #Compassion #RespectDeLaPersonne

Ils prêchent un mode de vie bas carbone mais prennent l'avion dès qu'ils le peuvent Ils prêchent l'anti-capitalisme mais se jettent sur le dernier mac pro ou le dernier iphone Ils prêchent l'égalité mais s'en mettent plein les poches avec de l'argent public dès qu'ils le peuvent Ils prêchent un droit du travail étriqué et ultra-régulé mais maltraitent leurs employés Ils prêchent le féminisme mais battent leur femme Ils prêchent le vivre ensemble mais vivent entre eux Ils prêchent l'école publique mais mettent leurs enfants dans le privé s'ils en ont l'opportunité Ils prêchent l'accueil massif de migrants mais n'en accueilleraient aucun chez eux Ils prêchent la tolérance mais sont le pinacle de l'intolérance au quotidien Les droitards sont souvent bouche bée devant l'hypocrisie des gauchistes Ce n'est pourtant pas un bug. Le gauchiste ne pense jamais l'individu mais la masse. Ses propres actions n'ont pas vraiment d'importance car il n'est qu'un grain de sable dans la fabrique de la société. Ce qui compte réellement, ce sont les actions collectives, les lois, les programmes publics, la prévention. Aux yeux d'un gauchiste, la lutte collective est 100x plus importante que le comportement individuel. Et justement, souvent à leurs yeux, le fait de prêcher la bonne parole les dispense moralement de se comporter correctement en privé. Ils ont sentiment de faire suffisamment le bien par leur combat public et cela contrebalance 100x le mal qu'ils pourraient faire en privé. Et même s'ils devaient admettre leur faute, ça resterait la faute de la société, des riches, de leur éducation, ou de leur enfance. Donc un combat collectif à mener pour que ça ne se reproduise plus au lieu d'une faute individuelle à expier. Ils ont le cerveau à l'envers. Ils ont renoncé à l'individu et au libre arbitre comme élément fondamental de la vie en commun. Une maladie mentale. #hypocrisie #société #individualisme

Quel belle réaction. Et de l’autre côté quelle laide rédaction. Soutien à @csapin Il est inouï qu’un tel sectarisme l’emporte à France Inter, il est scandaleux que le service public devienne de fait privatisé par l’extrême gauche, il est inadmissible que le pluralisme ne puisse s’y exprimer. Ces tyrans sont en train d’imposer leur idéologie, leur intolérance, leurs intérêts aux auditeurs, aux contribuables, au pays, aux principes de toute démocratie. Je réagirais de la même façon si la victime de cette censure imposée par la meute avait frappé un éditorialiste de gauche pour imposer une uniformité de droite sur le service public. Mais cette remarque n’est qu’une fiction au vu de la dérive profonde et révoltante de Radio France. Vivement que nous changions tout cela. #LibertéDexpression #Pluralisme #Médias

Leszek Kołakowski: Marxism, Historical Truth, and the Dangers of Political Absolutism Kołakowski was a major intellectual figure because he combined serious philosophical training, firsthand experience of communism, and the courage to revise his own convictions. He was not an anti-communist attacking Marxism from outside. He had once believed in Marxism and understood its appeal from within. After the 1956 thaw, he initially tried to recover a more humane Marxism based on freedom, dignity, and opposition to bureaucratic tyranny. His later criticism therefore carried unusual weight: it came from someone who had taken the doctrine seriously and tried to save it. His importance also lies in the distinctions he made. He did not simply equate Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and every form of socialism. In *Main Currents of Marxism*, he traced the development of Marxist ideas and examined how concepts such as historical necessity, class conflict, ideological truth, and the revolutionary party could encourage political intolerance. His central warning was that a movement claiming privileged access to historical truth may eventually treat disagreement not as legitimate opinion but as error, reaction, or treason. Once one party claims to represent history or humanity, it can justify controlling the press, courts, universities, civil society, and private life. This helps explain why communist regimes so often produced censorship, one-party rule, political policing, and coercive social transformation. My evaluation is that Kołakowski identified a genuine danger in Marxist political theory: the tendency to subordinate individual freedom and institutional pluralism to an allegedly necessary historical goal. His critique also makes the phrase “that was not real Marxism” inadequate on its own. Kołakowski’s greatest achievement was therefore not proving that “Marxism equals terror.” It was showing why a doctrine promising total liberation can become dangerous when it also claims total knowledge and gives one political organization the authority to impose that promise.

Leszek Kołakowski: Marxism, Historical Truth, and the Dangers of Political Absolutism Kołakowski was a major intellectual figure because he combined serious philosophical training, firsthand experience of communism, and the courage to revise his own convictions. He was not an anti-communist attacking Marxism from outside. He had once believed in Marxism and understood its appeal from within. After the 1956 thaw, he initially tried to recover a more humane Marxism based on freedom, dignity, and opposition to bureaucratic tyranny. His later criticism therefore carried unusual weight: it came from someone who had taken the doctrine seriously and tried to save it. His importance also lies in the distinctions he made. He did not simply equate Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and every form of socialism. In *Main Currents of Marxism*, he traced the development of Marxist ideas and examined how concepts such as historical necessity, class conflict, ideological truth, and the revolutionary party could encourage political intolerance. His central warning was that a movement claiming privileged access to historical truth may eventually treat disagreement not as legitimate opinion but as error, reaction, or treason. Once one party claims to represent history or humanity, it can justify controlling the press, courts, universities, civil society, and private life. This helps explain why communist regimes so often produced censorship, one-party rule, political policing, and coercive social transformation. My evaluation is that Kołakowski identified a genuine danger in Marxist political theory: the tendency to subordinate individual freedom and institutional pluralism to an allegedly necessary historical goal. His critique also makes the phrase “that was not real Marxism” inadequate on its own. Kołakowski’s greatest achievement was therefore not proving that “Marxism equals terror.” It was showing why a doctrine promising total liberation can become dangerous when it also claims total knowledge and gives one political organization the authority to impose that promise.

Turkey is bigger than Erdoğan. I stand for a free, democratic and European Turkey — and against authoritarianism, censorship, political imprisonment, religious intolerance and the erosion of the rule of law. Europe should never abandon the millions of Turkish citizens who want https://t.co/837ETcS4Oe #FreeTurkey #DemocracyNow #StandForFreedom #TR #EU

URGENT : cette nuit à Madrid, la police du ministre de l’intérieur, Fernando Marlaska a chargé la foule qui manifestait en soutien à Ceuta : gaz lacrymo, matraques, arrestations. Ils ne font preuve de la même intolérance face aux pillards et violeurs dans l’enclave de Ceuta. https://t.co/6cBQEni29e #Madrid #Ceuta #Protestation

Je n’ai aucun doute qu’aujourd’hui que l’expression de l’intolérance la plus totale matinée d’antisémitisme est située à l’extrême gauche. Avec en sus une sottise infinie. Les intolérants de sévices publics expliquent pour refuser Charles Sapin que Valeurs Actuelles a été #Antisémitisme #Intolérance #ExtrêmeGauche #FR

Komentář Alexe Švamberka se zaměřuje na kontroverzní postavu Ratka Mladiče, jehož obdiv v Srbsku a podpora ze strany některých fanoušků pohánějí debatu o nacionalismu, válečných zločinech a intolerance ve sportovním prostředí, zatímco kritizuje nedostatečnou reakci klubů jako Sparta na extremistické projevy. #Srebrenica #Mladić #bosenskýřezník