Search

The government itself fuels that suspicion: BJP minister Amit Shah (Home Affairs) said in December that the cleanup operation is intended to prevent “infiltrators” from choosing India’s prime minister, a term that is often used by the Hindu nationalist party to refer to Muslim immigrants. #India #Protesten #Kiesregister (translated)

The author named Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, the IRGC, Samidoun, and other organizations that they claimed glorified deadly Islamic jihad terror. The author also stated that Belgium alone counted a hundred Salafist organizations. The author sarcastically noted that Israel was nonetheless designated as the instigator of polarization and wrote that readers of NRC no longer needed to read De Speld. #België #Jihad #Polarisatie #BE #IL (translated)

The author warned that Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood could thrive in Belgium and called it life-threatening. This happened according to the author ten years after the deadly jihadist attacks in Brussels and three years after the attacks on October 7 in Israel. The author asked the minister if the government realized it was already "five minutes past twelve" and wrote that the situation had already been serious enough. https://t.co/QFOdefeC4M #veiligheid #terrorisme #vrijheid #BE #IL (translated)

Bas Paternotte wrote that Speaker of the House Thom van Campen (VVD) did not dare to present the decision to the entire House of Representatives, out of fear of upsetting the Christian factions and Muslim members of DENK. He accused Van Campen of being particularly cowardly. https://t.co/uloSkaucnj #TweedeKamer #Politiek #Nederland (translated)

The author again referred to Hans Teeuwen accurately and wrote that Teeuwen believed that moderate Muslims hardly contributed to the fight against radical Islamic ideas, as they remained silent according to him. https://t.co/rp5qzeFzy0 #HansTeeuwen #humor #radicalisme (translated)

The author wrote that the European Parliament had approved a proposal to place the Muslim Brotherhood on the EU terrorism list. The author stated that as a spokesperson in the Committee on Justice and Home Affairs, he had contributed to the proposal and called on the Council to take action now. https://t.co/Flgomh2hid #EU #terrorisme #politiek #EU #NL (translated)

"a direct restriction of the freedom of religion of more than a million Dutch Muslims and Jews" Denk-Member Ergin calls the statements of the Secretary of State "a direct restriction of the freedom of religion of more than a million Dutch Muslims and Jews." #dierenwelzijn #ritueelslachten #vrijheidvanreligie (translated)

The author addressed Stephan referencing Hamas and stated that the iftar would not be prohibited. According to the author, it was about the police no longer organizing religious celebrations, regardless of the religion, because the police must remain neutral. The author wrote that regulating loudspeakers, enforcing government neutrality, and stricter animal welfare laws were not Muslim harassment and had nothing to do with polls. Those measures, according to them, would protect the western democratic frameworks. The author believed that the law should apply equally to everyone and that the parties were rightly addressing the issue, albeit much too late. #religie #neutraliteit #wetsgeving (translated)

My friend asked why the right of Muslims to broadcast the call to prayer via loudspeakers would outweigh her right not to be disturbed. She wrote that she heard an unsolicited message at home in a language she did not understand, coming from a religion that, according to her, many Dutch people consider extreme. #vrijheidvanmeningsuiting #geluidsoverlast #religieuzevrijheid (translated)

Chris Janssens stated that a member of the Weyts cabinet sent a fake opinion piece to newspaper editors during the budget preparation. According to Janssens, the piece tried to exonerate Muslims from homophobia and shift the responsibility to the right-wing in Flanders. He wrote that N-VA staff were just as lost as the party leadership, in his view. https://t.co/lpQTeNcuhh #België #politiek #media (translated)

Bart Nijman wrote that Hussein Issa, the Gaza student at Maastricht University, had posted the video on his own Instagram. According to Nijman, an angry, bearded influencer suggested in it that he would send a group of ten million Muslims to the university if the Palestinian student was suspended. https://t.co/AmhCdDI7lB #Maastricht #Palestina #Studenten (translated)

"Look for the differences Jetten slime-mongering with Muslims, Jetten with a disclaimer distancing himself from Christian children. But maybe he thinks exactly the same as Muslims and not as Christians, that could also be the case. Thanks for the photo, @parlementor" https://t.co/GxoSey3NJ8 #Islam #Christendom #Politiek (translated)

RTL meldt dat 15,8 procent van de Nederlanders het slaan van een vrouw niet onder alle omstandigheden afwijst. Staatssecretaris Judith Tielen noemt dat „schrikbarend”. Terecht. Weet u wat ook schrikbarend is? Wat RTL niet vertelt: de gebruikte World Values Survey stelde óók deze vragen: Q141: Mag een man zijn vrouw slaan? Q249: Tot welke religie behoort u? Met moslim als afzonderlijke categorie. Q123–128: Hoe belangrijk is God, hoe vaak bidt u en hoe religieus bent u? Q231–233: Waar zijn u en uw ouders geboren? Q250: Wat is uw etnische achtergrond? De officiële UvA-samenvatting is vervolgens glashelder: “Daarnaast zijn moslims gemiddeld traditioneler dan niet-religieuzen, ook als rekening wordt gehouden met hoe belangrijk religie voor iemand is.” De UvA voegt eraan toe dat dit verschil bij andere religies niet werd gevonden. RTL noemt wél leeftijd, geldzorgen en de manosfeer. Maar religie, herkomst en etniciteit: nul woorden. De uitslag is „schrikbarend”. De onderzoeksbevinding over moslims blijkbaar vooral ongemakkelijk. Dat is geen gebrek aan gegevens. Dat is journalistieke selectie: alle vragen stellen, alleen de comfortabele antwoorden publiceren. #Vrouwenrechten #veiligheid https://t.co/YTKprNOqIn https://t.co/fAe4gXnCeV #Vrouwenrechten #journalistiek #maatschappij

‘Het is toch maar een stukje stof, maak je niet druk.’ lees je dan als je voor een hoofddoekenverbod bent op school. Wat ik me dan afvraag: als het toch maar een ‘stukje stof’ is, waarom verbiedt Azerbeidzjan, een land met 97% moslims, het dan zelf in al haar scholen? Net als https://t.co/DO6yCR85El #hoofddoekenverbod #Azerbeidzjan #vrijheidvanonderwijs #AZ