Search

The day's Bureaucrat urged to continue watching the shared videos to get an understanding of the situation in France. He claimed that immigrants and leftists were looting stores as well as burning and destroying places, and mentioned that Palestinian and Algerian flags were flying. #Ranska #maahanmuutto #kaupungit (translated)

"I was attacked and pushed down. Luckily, I was wearing a bulletproof vest and a helmet, otherwise I probably wouldn't be here anymore, because they kept kicking me," Levine later said from his hospital bed in stable condition. #IisraeliAsunikud #Palestiina #VägivaldLäänekaldal (translated)

Mika Merano estimates that if the next government were red-blue in the order he meant, the Finns Party would certainly become the largest party in the 2031 elections. He predicted that the composition of the government would at least drive Finland into stagnation. Merano wrote that from the opposition's perspective, criticizing the government could be amusing for the party if the credibility of the right were to suffer, for example, in votes concerning the recognition of Palestine and corruption. However, in his view, the situation would not be a laughing matter for Finland. He mentioned that he had been following recent statements with interest and had been pondering whether the educated bourgeoisie would still be stronger than the right-wingers. #politiikka #Suomi #vaalit (translated)

Rami Kurimo wrote that the flags of Palestine and the Soviet Union were flying in France. He asked what this indicated about the riots in France and the Palestine movement, and mentioned sources like Instagram and the New York Times. https://t.co/RWuJSHVUkI #Palestiina #Ranska #Mellakat (translated)

The Daily Bureaucrat described October 7 as the day to remember the massacre of Jews by Palestinians. He called the mayor of New York an Islamist and wrote that he had visited a Palestinian restaurant. According to the bureaucrat, there was no need to guess the mayor's side. #Palestiina #NewYork #Joukkomurha (translated)

Martti Kosonen wrote that the Finns Party's line worked according to him. He claimed that the National Coalition Party was distributing money to developing countries, Palestinians, immigrants, organizations, what he characterized as pseudosciences, unnecessary business subsidies, as well as to the EU, the UN, and railways he described as unnecessary, while according to him, the Finns Party did not distribute money for these purposes. Kosonen also claimed that the National Coalition Party was taking money from retirees, heirs, and elderly care facilities. He said the list was endless and considered that the National Coalition Party could no longer function as the governing party, but the Finns Party could. In his writing, he noted the Finns Party, Riikka Purra, and Wille Rydman. https://t.co/MiANyh6CEP #perussuomalaiset #politiikka #Suomi (translated)

Dennis Mitzner criticized the foreign minister's statement, in which he said that Finland is strongly committed to a two-state solution. Mitzner questioned whether the mention was necessary and believed it placed the statement, along with the mentioned 1,200 murdered Israeli citizens, in a political context that weakened the statement. He wondered whether Hamas would have started the attack even if the Gaza Strip, which it governs, had been part of an independent Palestine. According to Mitzner, the attack could have been even broader and targeted Israel's largest settlement centers from the West Bank. #Suomi #Palestina #IsraelinKriisi (translated)

The Daily Bureaucrat provided Martin Paasi with a summary of the cases in which, according to Israel, it would have accepted a two-state model, but the Palestinians did not. The author described the Palestinians as Arabs and estimated that the list was probably not comprehensive. https://t.co/IzGWXauqYK #IsraelinPalestiina #KahdenValtionMalli #LähiItä (translated)

Mikael Lith described Timo R. Stewart as an ideologically biased disseminator of propaganda regarding Palestine and claimed that he overlooked the Palestinians' responsibility for the situation in the Middle East. According to Lith, Stewart did not mention that the Palestinians had repeatedly rejected peace offers that were favorable to them, most recently in 2008. Lith also claimed that Stewart downplayed the significance of terrorism in the Palestinian struggle for independence, in which it had, according to him, played a major role. #Palestiina #LähiItä #terrorismi (translated)

Martin Paasi asked Timo Stewart to clarify Mitzner's observations and referred to the videos he linked to, in which, according to him, Clinton stated that nothing had happened to the Palestinians. According to Paasi, it seemed that the Palestinians had not seized the opportunities presented to them. He questioned why the situation was not as Mitzner and Clinton claimed. #Palestiina #Mitzner #Clinton (translated)

Dennis Mitzner criticized Timo Stewart for suggesting that he believed Israel was an obstacle to the two-state solution. Mitzner argued that the Palestinians had not accepted Israel's state proposals in direct negotiations, the latest of which were the Camp David and Taba offers in 2000–2001, as well as Ehud Olmert's offers in 2008. He added that Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza in 2005. According to Mitzner, the PLO's decades-old support for the two-state solution did not indicate that the Palestinians accepted Israel's existence as a Jewish state. Mitzner wrote that Stewart viewed the destruction of Hamas's ideology as unrealistic without killing all people. Mitzner interpreted this to mean that Stewart considered all Gazans as supporters of Hamas's ideology, but he himself said he would not go that far. He referred to Hamas's election in Gaza and claimed that no Gazan had attempted to help Israeli hostages in the past couple of years. Mitzner compared the situation to the Allies' victory over Nazism and the defeat of Japan, as well as the actions of the United Arab Emirates against the Muslim Brotherhood. He stated that the Western left should stop rewarding Palestinian violence and anti-Semitism. According to Mitzner, Stewart claimed that there was no Palestinian state because Israel occupied the territory and did not allow it to become independent. Mitzner denied this and described the area's history: according to him, it belonged to the British mandate from 1917 and prior to that to the Ottoman Empire. He wrote that the Arab leadership rejected the UN's 1947 partition plan, after which Jordan controlled the West Bank and Egypt controlled Gaza without establishing a Palestinian state. According to Mitzner, the territories came under Israeli control in the 1967 war, which Jordan, Egypt, and Syria initiated with the intent to destroy, and the Arab world's negative attitude towards Israel continued with the Khartoum resolution of the three no's. Mitzner claimed that Stewart ignored Palestinian actions and concluded by asking whether the dispute ultimately related to the fact that the opposing side was the Jewish state of Israel. #IsraelinVastaisetAsenteet #Palestiinalaiskysymys #KansainvälinenPolitiikka (translated)