Tere Sammallahti described the events in Marseille as chaotic, reminiscent of a civil war, and considered calling them a student protest to be extremely naive. He wrote that the aftermath was harsh, as according to him, it combined naive immigration policy, leftist subversion, and the Russian propaganda machine. https://t.co/062MVbGxPx #Marseille #Opiskelijamielenosoitus #Politiikka (translated)
Petteri Tarkkonen accused Yle News of lying and wrote that it was no longer about protests but riots. He claimed that Yle was operating without respect for its sponsors and wondered why some politicians accepted and defended its actions. Finally, Tarkkonen demanded the closure of Yle. https://t.co/ouW6c4NZHV #valehtelu #mielenosoitus #politiikka (translated)
Matti Molari wrote that he interprets based on Tere Sammallahti that Jussi Halla-aho's immigration criticism had only been a pale preview of Petteri Orpo's even harsher line. Molari said that Orpo was one of the first to practice such politics in Finland along with others from the National Coalition Party. #Suomi #politiikka #maahanmuutto (translated)
Pasi Majuri wrote that, in his opinion, the politician appealed to racism to gain publicity from the media he portrays as leftist when he had no other means. He used derogatory leftist-related terms regarding the politician and the media. https://t.co/Qpu2h8luxJ #rasismi #politiikka #media (translated)
Terhi Majasalmi asked Li Andersson if she was satisfied with what happened in France and Italy. #kysymys #politiikka #Eurooppa (translated)
Samu Mökillä wrote that in the high school students' protest, participants were primarily trying to avoid the police, in his opinion. He claimed this was the reason why no one reads Helsingin Sanomat. https://t.co/kN5B3g20Kt #mielenosoitus #lukio #politiikka (translated)
The author wrote that the paramilitary groups of the entity described as the closest partner of the current Finnish government had assaulted a French mayor and an American cameraman. According to him, several Finnish ministers shared a strong value basis with the partner, but Finland had remained silent. https://t.co/FnodWGEFsR https://t.co/YQ3ZvO64Pi #Suomi #politiikka #ihmisoikeudet #FI #FR #US (translated)
According to the author, Caroline Fourest, described as a liberal feminist, had addressed how the leader of France's far-left party, Mélenchon, had changed his political strategy, abandoned secularism, and allied himself with Islamists. #feminismi #Ranska #politiikka #FR (translated)
Klaus assessed that in the riots in France, the alliance between the left and the Islamists had enough capable young people that managing the situation might be difficult. According to him, the left alone would not be able to muster enough strength in the streets, but the alliance with the Islamists complicated the situation. Klaus also wrote that over the years, France might bend under this power if people were afraid and began to believe that the country could no longer be saved. #Ranska #mellakat #politiikka (translated)
The Day's Bureaucrat wrote that the situation reports from France and neighboring countries reminded him of Iran's developments in the 1970s. He claimed that the left and Islamists are now resorting to violence and feel they are becoming stronger day by day. #Ranska #protestit #politiikka (translated)
The author assesses that those in charge of the EU apparently believed that prolonging the war in Ukraine would promote the federalist project. According to him, continuing the war could indeed fragment the union, as the right defending sovereign nation-states was rising to power in major European countries like Germany and France. The writing ended abruptly in the middle of the list. #EU #Ukraina #politiikka #DE #FR (translated)
The Daily Bureaucrat described the events as riots of leftist Islamists rather than protests. He wrote that they had gradually escalated and assessed that they would threaten the stability of French society seriously after a while. https://t.co/TOzQJlSBOd #Ranska #Politiikka #Yhteiskunta (translated)
Roni Arvonen estimated to Martti Paldanius that the Finns Party probably considered the immigration paper to be good. He speculated that the criticism was directed at the fact that the National Coalition Party had not taken concrete actions to solve the immigration problem and had not initiated any legislative proposals. Arvonen urged the National Coalition Party to move from words to actions. #maahanmuutto #politiikka #Suomi (translated)
Sture Fjäder stated that he opposes the current immigration policy and wants immigration to be reduced to zero. He said he has criticized his party, the KOK, for its stumbling in the year 2026 and has received messages urging him not to act against the party and to reconsider his statements about immigration. Fjäder described the situation as sad and said he defends freedom of speech. #politiikka https://t.co/fYRFuBanjX #maahanmuutto #politiikka #sananvapaus (translated)
The vice-chair of SDP, Pinja Perholehto, criticizes the Left Alliance's comments and urges to focus on changing Finnish politics instead of the leftist parties squabbling among themselves. #Politiikka #Vasemmistoliitto #SDP (translated)
As a former member of the National Coalition Party, Elina Ketonen wrote that she had been following the party's change in immigration policy with interest. She noted that in a recent poll by Yle, the National Coalition Party had fallen behind the Finns Party, and the party's parliamentary group had presented a strict immigration line. According to Ketonen, this was about the parliamentary group's program, not a directive approved by the party congress. She wrote that the program would not bind the next government nor guarantee concrete decisions during the next term. Ketonen interpreted the shift in line primarily as a bid for votes and assessed that the rhetoric would harden as support weakened. In her view, credibility stemmed from consistent actions, and voters had the right to ask whether the National Coalition Party's line had truly changed or if only the campaign speeches had changed. #maahanmuutto #politiikka #keskustelu (translated)
Sture Fjäder wrote that he supports the National Coalition Party and opposes blue-red coalitions. He stated that he supports right-wing or center-right governments because he sees himself as a bourgeois and right-wing individual. Fjäder demanded that Chairman Orpo publicly declare that the National Coalition Party would not engage in leftist cooperation, and he assessed that otherwise, the poll support would not turn to an increase. #vaalit2027 #KOK https://t.co/PLjDeZuQka #politiikka #oikeisto #Suomi (translated)
Suvi-Anne Siimes pondered whether it was a good thing that the parties were drafting goal programs on different topics, and stated that each of them deserved a discussion that examined the overall picture without bias. According to her, merely settling for rhetorical criticism was not beneficial for anyone. #politiikka #keskustelu #tavoitteet (translated)
Matti Viren wrote that, in his opinion, the National Coalition's decision would practically mean opening the borders: if Pizzeria X announced it needed 20 employees, the Migration Office would have no say in the matter. He referred to Kaleva, mentioning that the National Coalition still supports abandoning the labor availability assessment, even though this was not mentioned in the party's directives, and asked if it couldn't have fit into nine pages. https://t.co/4w6gjmAyva #Työvoima #Politiikka #Palkkaus (translated)
The day's bureaucrat wrote that he finds Europeans incomprehensibly helpless and claimed that leftist bureaucracy and state centrism have paralyzed them. #Eurooppa #politiikka #byrokratia (translated)
