Daniel Schatz wrote that Mohamed Ali, whom he called a leftist, could be linked to a fraudulent company. Referring to information from Lars Petersson, Schatz claimed that the company lacked revenue and was not registered for F-tax, VAT, or payroll taxes. He also wrote that the share capital appeared to be depleted and that no control and balance sheet seemed to have been established. Schatz accused Aktuellt of not having verified the information before Agneta Nyvall appeared as a character witness. He wrote that the media had previously reported that Mohamed Abdukardir Ali had undergone debt restructuring and believed that this made his involvement in AfriTech more notable. According to Schatz, Ali was personally liable as a board member if the company had depleted the share capital without establishing a control and balance sheet. He also stated that the company had been fined a week earlier for submitting the annual report late. #Vänsterpartiet #skandaler #Affärsjuridik (translated)