Search

The Spanish newspaper reported that Ceuta had gone to the Supreme Court and accused the Government of not carrying out any expulsions. According to the media, the city asked the court to force the Executive to return all the people whose expulsion it was requesting. https://t.co/ALRhSt0Gt5 #Ceuta #España #Supremo (translated)

In the latest report from ADP Research, it was found that executives and senior managers often spend at least 16 hours a week on unpaid overtime, which contrasts with the growing group of employees who work less frequently after hours. #Praca #WorkLifeBalance #Nadgodziny (translated)

Antonio Tabet described a publication as biting satire and humorous criticism of a political agent who, according to him, should endure being the target of public mockery. He stated that humor and freedom of expression were protected by the Constitution, by ADPF 130, and by ADI 4451, and said he had seen the content on Gustavo Vilela's Instagram. Tabet added that the visual joke with musical parody did not mean that the Bolsonaro family was the family linked to militias that he might have mentioned before. In the end, he stated that the text had been written by his legal team to avoid further censorship. #Sátira #LiberdadeDeExpressão #Humor (translated)

Igor Završnik labeled the journalist as the most corrupt in Slovenia and wrote that his statements yesterday about Janša and Poglajen showed strong hatred. He claimed that this person is an activist, not a journalist or commentator, and accused him of attributing behavior to others that he, according to Završnik, carries out himself. https://t.co/ii2KTZTcSh #novinar #sovraštvo #Slovenija (translated)

Libertarec wrote that it is hard to believe that people have been convinced to support the abolition of the mandatory RTV fee, as this would have been impossible in his opinion two years ago. He identified the mistake as having directed all forces to defend Golob, Janković, Bratušek, and others whom he linked to the mafia, and therefore, according to him, attention was lacking for the most important question. https://t.co/ADPJqHJUIa #RTV #prisilnina #politika (translated)

Jeje questioned why the Electoral Public Ministry had not yet requested the annulment of Flávio Bolsonaro's slate. He stated that the TSE (Superior Electoral Court) had a consolidated understanding that the use of churches and religious leaders to promote candidacies could constitute an abuse of power and lead to the annulment of the registration and the ineligibility of those involved. He cited a decision from the TSE as an example, according to which statements made from the pulpit during public worship and in front of a large audience indicated that the structure and religious authority had been used to promote candidacies, and not only for spiritual purposes (TSE. Rel. Min. Antônio Carlos Ferreira. AREspe 0600354-26.2024.6.26.0220). He also mentioned Article 24, Item VIII, of the Electoral Code, which prohibited parties and candidates from receiving donations, including through advertising, from charitable and religious entities. #Eleições2024 #JustiçaEleitoral #AbusoDePoder (translated)

TeAtualizei stated that the requirement of 54 votes from senators for the impeachment of a Supreme Federal Court minister would have been an unconstitutional interference by Gilmar Mendes, determined in a preliminary injunction in an ADPF. According to the author, this requirement was not part of the Constitution or the law, and the Senate could review it before taking other measures. #Impeachment #SupremoTribunalFederal #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

David Ágape stated that electoral disputes have begun to be taken to ministers of the Supreme Federal Court through old processes, without a new drawing, which, according to him, emasculated the Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He compared the situation to the election of 2022, when Alexandre de Moraes presided over the TSE and was part of the STF, and said that, for many, decisions against Jair Bolsonaro and his supporters were decisive for Lula's victory. According to Ágape, Gilmar Mendes granted a preliminary injunction to include Renan Santos in a Globo debate, although he acknowledged that the topic did not fit within a complaint about Deltan Dallagnol. He stated that subsequent requests regarding electoral disputes in Bahia and Paraná were also presented in this complaint. Ágape added that the PT requested Flávio Dino, within an ADPF regarding mining, an investigation into alleged foreign interference in favor of Flávio Bolsonaro; in another complaint related to Dallagnol, Dino suspended an order from the TSE. Flávio Bolsonaro's campaign, he said, appealed to Luiz Fux to challenge the intervention, in a process that was already addressing the removal of content on the internet. Ágape concluded that Edson Fachin tried to organize the situation, but it was too late. https://t.co/tRVnTKz9aT #STF #TSE #Eleições2022 (translated)

I will make a prediction here. The PT or PSOL or someone like that will do what the lawyers of Anão Santos did not do, which is to file a ADPF with Dino to force Renan to attend the debate. Dino will agree. Renan will go to the debate thinking he will intimidate Flávio, but in reality, the opposite will happen in the popular imagination. Instead of damaging Flávio's image, it will actually improve it. #Política #Debate #Eleições (translated)

Cármen Lúcia barred Renan Santos' participation in the TV Globo debate... The member of the STF understood that she cannot interfere in TSE issues and that the ADPF is not the legal remedy for this matter. Renan Santos is out of the Globo debate. https://t.co/ypUITsLZ8S #STF #Debate #Justiça (translated)

URGENT: Renan Santos announces that he will APPEAL the decisions of the TSE and STF that blocked his attempt to participate in the Globo debate. After Nunes Marques denied the injunction at the TSE and Cármen Lúcia rejected the ADPF in the Supreme Court due to procedural issues, Renan states that he will continue the legal battle to try to participate in the last presidential debate before the first round. #Eleições2022 #DebatePresidencial #Justiça (translated)

🚨 ⚖️ ATTENTION: Minister Cármen Lúcia (STF) REJECTS Renan Santos' action to ensure his participation in the Globo debate for understanding that the ADPF is not the appropriate procedural instrument to challenge his exclusion; however, she did not analyze the merits of the dispute. https://t.co/wHgIFwleFS #STF #Justiça #Debate (translated)

URGENT: Cármen Lúcia REJECTS the request from Missão to ensure Renan Santos in the presidential debate on Globo. The minister of the STF decided not to consider the ADPF presented by the party, stating that the action used an "inappropriate procedural route" and did not meet the requirement of subsidiarity. Missão had requested a preliminary injunction to force Globo to include Renan in the debate this Thursday (1st), at 9:30 PM. Cármen Lúcia, however, did not judge the merits of Renan's exclusion: the decision blocks the action for procedural issues. As a result, the party suffers a new judicial defeat after Nunes Marques also denied, in the TSE, the injunction that sought to guarantee the candidate's participation. #Política #DebatePresidencial #Justiça (translated)

🚨 ⚖️ In addition to notifying the TSE, Renan Santos presents an ADPF to the STF to request that the Court ensures his participation in the Globo presidential debate; the case is under the report of Minister Cármen Lúcia. https://t.co/LUt10fDT2X #TSE #STF #Eleições2023 (translated)