Search

The services in action addressed the Prime Minister with a question about how it can be claimed that Poland does not accept asylum applications, since — according to the latest data from Eurostat cited by the author — from January to July 2026, 3,565 such applications were registered in Poland. Among the applicants, citizens of Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria, Uzbekistan, Armenia, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, and Somalia were mentioned. The author also stated that by June 2026, 850 positive first-instance decisions had been issued. https://t.co/jSy11MNahX #azyl #Polska #imigracja (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Wielowieyska of accepting the police's version as an established fact and assessing the detained individual before the court's decision. He questioned the legal basis for identifying the man who — as he wrote — was calmly standing at the crosswalk, as well as the attempt to take him aside. He asked whether the refusal to provide personal information justified intervention. Kusznieruk noted that pushing away the officers and fleeing did not exempt the assessment of the legality and proportionality of the force used. He also pointed out the choking of the subdued individual, the vulgarities and threats that — as he wrote — were audible on the recording, and questioned whether such behavior was within the standards of human rights. He added that the court had refused to detain the man, and according to the defense, it concluded that the prosecutor had not even demonstrated a high probability of the alleged act being committed. He characterized this as more than just a routine refusal of detention. He deemed the attribution of a crisis to the detainee based on his behavior as public stigmatization. He also believed that publicly presenting him as an aggressor before the court's decision could be seen as incitement, and that journalists should monitor power, rather than act as its spokesperson. #prawaCzłowieka #Polska #policja (translated)

Sławomir Cenckiewicz praised the interview with Piotr, who — as he wrote — understood the security principles in the confrontation with the regime and those whom Cenckiewicz referred to as tormentors. He added that, in his opinion, few people understand this. He particularly liked the justification for the refusal of medical examinations and the description of the behavior of the police officers, who, he claimed, naively thought they would overhear the conversation in the hospital when MP Jakubiak would ask Piotr for his surname. #wywiad #BHP #polska (translated)

NeoJudgeTuleye wrote that he watched the entire live conversation with Piotr and that he confirmed his earlier theses. The author assessed that the policewoman and her colleagues made a serious mistake. He claimed that without the experience and knowledge of a military gendarme, as well as without witnesses and media attention, the detainee could have been portrayed as a mentally ill knifeman who committed suicide in his cell. He also referenced the case of a detained farmer. According to NeoJudgeTuleye, the policewoman could have been considered injured in a confrontation with a right-wing criminal. The author urged people to know their rights, analyze cases, and draw their own conclusions, as — he wrote — MotherKurka says. #Polska #PrawaCzłowieka #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The commentator wrote that during the police intervention involving Mr. Piotr, several hundred zlotys disappeared, which were supposed to be in the zipper pocket of his jacket. He added that no one has revealed or shown that the money was returned, and it is still unknown what happened to the banknotes. He described the situation as absurd. #Polska #policja #absurd (translated)

The commentator referred to a statement by Piotr, who allegedly called Donald Tusk's accusations a mistake and denied ever walking in public with a drawn knife. Piotr also reportedly noted that almost everyone has a Swiss Army knife, which can be useful outdoors, for example, for preparing food or cutting a zip tie. The commentator wrote that an innocent person was made into a knife-wielder, and he deemed it disgusting. #Polska #Tusk #prawda (translated)

Marcin Edo rated the actions of Żurek and his collaborators as a failure. He wrote that the prosecutor's office was seeking temporary detention for Piotr W., which — in his opinion — was meant to intimidate the Polish people. He informed that the Warsaw court did not grant the request, and Piotr W. returned home after more than 50 hours since his detention. https://t.co/9pE1drH7UK #Polska #sprawiedliwość #polityka (translated)

Marcin Edo wrote that Piotr W. was called a "knife man" by Donald Tusk and government media. He added that the prosecutor's office lost in court a case regarding a detention request that Judge Anna Kuzaj did not consider. Edo also used offensive terms towards Tusk and the government. #Polska #sąd #prawo (translated)

The Office of the President of the Republic of Poland wrote that the president this week, first meeting with the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal and then canceling a foreign visit to stay in the country, showed readiness to firmly defend Polish law and citizens' rights. The entry also mentioned the president's advisor Stachowiak and Republic TV. #Polska #Prawo #Obywatele (translated)

From the court – tennis information reported that after winning the title at the Wuhan Open, Maja Chwalińska was expected to rise to 11th place in the WTA ranking. According to the profile, for the first time in history, two Polish women were set to be so high in the rankings: Iga Świątek was to maintain the 9th position after the WTA 1000 tournament in Beijing. The author pointed out that Chwalińska was set to overtake Iva Jovic, Diana Sznajder, Belinda Bencic, Elise Mertens, Victoria Mboko, Sorana Cirstea, Amanda Anisimova, Naomi Osaka, and Alexandra Eala in the latest ranking. He also expressed hope that in the coming months, two Polish women would be in the top ten of the ranking. #zkortu #WTA #tenis #Polska (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that those associated with Giertych's environment, who mocked his post from yesterday, should feel embarrassed today after the court's decision. The court did not impose any preventive measures against Piotr, which—according to Hübner—most likely meant that there was no physical attack on the police officers. #Polska #sąd #polityka (translated)

Professor Jarosław Flis from Jagiellonian University points out that in the coming months, the key issue will be the struggle between the main parties over which of them makes a bigger mistake, which could determine the outcome of the elections in 2027. #wybory2024 #Polska #politologia (translated)

Waldemar criticized the statements about the constitutional crisis and the possibility of the state being taken over by Czarzasty. He argued that the constitution provides that in case the president is unable to act, his duties are performed by the Marshal of the Sejm, and reminded that Nawrocki had previously expressed a similar position. According to Waldemar, Berek and the others took an oath because the president refused, and the Venice Commission allowed for other solutions when the president blocks actions. The author pointed out that the opponents of this decision used offensive terms and referred to the "strength of the nation." Przydacz, as Waldemar reported, raised the alarm that the Constitutional Tribunal might soon declare Nawrocki unfit to perform his duties. Waldemar assessed that the critics reacted with panic because they were losing control over the Tribunal, which they had treated as their property for years. He added that it was not Czarzasty who abdicated or was lost, but his opponents who had weakened the Tribunal for years and were now screaming about succession and the use of force. He appealed for them to apply the constitution regardless of whether its provisions suited them. #Konstytucja #Polska #Prawo (translated)