Search

Magda wrote that Jarosław Kaczyński, speaking about the Constitutional Tribunal, independence, and apoliticism, caused her embarrassment. She assessed that Bogdan Święczkowski was a close collaborator of Zbigniew Ziobro and that he worked with him for changes that, in her opinion, destroyed the justice system, undermined trust in the courts and the prosecutor's office, and harmed people. She added that Ziobro currently avoids legal responsibility, which he previously sought to shape for his own advantage. According to Magda, Święczkowski continued this policy as the president of the TC, and the current shape of the Tribunal had nothing to do with the rule of law. She also recognized that those defending him in this form supported Kaczyński's political arrangement and his people, as well as their desire to maintain influence over the state despite losing elections. #Polska #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #prawo (translated)

The author r00t🇪🇺 accused Bogucki of selective representation of the Constitutional Tribunal's ruling from December 3, 2015, in case K 34/15. He pointed out that Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution entrusts the Sejm with the election of judges of the Tribunal, while the obligation to take an oath before the President results from the law. He referred to points 8.5.1, 8.5.3, and 8.6 of the justification. As he wrote, the Tribunal considered the oath to be an element added by the legislator to the constitutional procedure, and its acceptance by the President was regarded as an obligation. He added that the Tribunal questioned the interpretation of provisions that would not foresee the immediate taking of an oath. The author assessed that the President does not approve the choice made by the Sejm and cannot, based on statutory competence, co-decide on the composition of the Tribunal. He accused Bogucki of omitting parts of the ruling and using it to provoke opposition to the government and to present its actions as an attack on the constitutional order. Referring to Karol Nawrocki, the author reminded that Article 126, paragraph 1 of the Constitution defines the President of the Republic of Poland as the highest representative of the state and the guarantor of continuity of power, while paragraph 3 indicates that he performs his tasks on the principles specified in the Constitution and laws. He wrote that using the authority of the Constitution to justify a political position does not correspond to those obligations. #Konstytucja #Prawo #Polityka (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Wielowieyska of accepting the police's version as an established fact and assessing the detained individual before the court's decision. He questioned the legal basis for identifying the man who — as he wrote — was calmly standing at the crosswalk, as well as the attempt to take him aside. He asked whether the refusal to provide personal information justified intervention. Kusznieruk noted that pushing away the officers and fleeing did not exempt the assessment of the legality and proportionality of the force used. He also pointed out the choking of the subdued individual, the vulgarities and threats that — as he wrote — were audible on the recording, and questioned whether such behavior was within the standards of human rights. He added that the court had refused to detain the man, and according to the defense, it concluded that the prosecutor had not even demonstrated a high probability of the alleged act being committed. He characterized this as more than just a routine refusal of detention. He deemed the attribution of a crisis to the detainee based on his behavior as public stigmatization. He also believed that publicly presenting him as an aggressor before the court's decision could be seen as incitement, and that journalists should monitor power, rather than act as its spokesperson. #prawaCzłowieka #Polska #policja (translated)

The author summarized the day, stating that the court established based on police recordings and witness testimonies that the officers attacked and beat an innocent man and nearly killed him. He described him as a reserve soldier, a volunteer firefighter, and a community activist, as well as a good father and husband. #sprawiedliwość #bezpieczeństwo #prawaCzłowieka #PL (translated)

NeoJudgeTuleye wrote that he watched the entire live conversation with Piotr and that he confirmed his earlier theses. The author assessed that the policewoman and her colleagues made a serious mistake. He claimed that without the experience and knowledge of a military gendarme, as well as without witnesses and media attention, the detainee could have been portrayed as a mentally ill knifeman who committed suicide in his cell. He also referenced the case of a detained farmer. According to NeoJudgeTuleye, the policewoman could have been considered injured in a confrontation with a right-wing criminal. The author urged people to know their rights, analyze cases, and draw their own conclusions, as — he wrote — MotherKurka says. #Polska #PrawaCzłowieka #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The Office of the President of the Republic of Poland wrote that the president this week, first meeting with the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal and then canceling a foreign visit to stay in the country, showed readiness to firmly defend Polish law and citizens' rights. The entry also mentioned the president's advisor Stachowiak and Republic TV. #Polska #Prawo #Obywatele (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk described the court's decision to deny the arrest of Piotr after the protest as a disgrace for the prosecution. He stated that, in his opinion, the lack of high probability of committing a crime meant that the prosecution had not demonstrated the basic premise for applying the arrest. He claimed that Piotr had spent over 50 hours deprived of freedom, and the police conducted a brutal intervention and a request for arrest was submitted without convincing evidence. He noted that the denial of arrest does not mean acquittal, but he considered it a serious signal for the prosecution. He called for the accountability of the police officers and their superiors. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk informed that the court refused to temporarily arrest Piotr W., and after more than 50 hours of detention, the man was supposed to return home. He described that Piotr W. was standing at a red light at a pedestrian crossing, after which the police were said to have chased him, subdued him, and pinned him to the floor. According to the account referenced by Kusznieruk, the man lost consciousness and was taken to the hospital in handcuffs. The author noted that — as he wrote — the specific basis for the initiation of the identification has not been publicly clarified to this day. He added that the prosecution requested a temporary arrest, and the court did not agree to this request. Kusznieruk assessed that arrest should be a last resort and called for an investigation into the basis for the intervention, the use of force by the officers, and the circumstances surrounding Piotr W.'s loss of consciousness. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

The author wrote that the court did not agree to arrest Piotr W., who — as she stated — was beaten by the police. She described the arrest as absurd and attributed the decision to the work of the lawyers and the support of Poles. She added that the pressure makes sense. #Sprawiedliwość #Polska #PrawaCzłowieka (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that the dispute regarding the Constitutional Tribunal concerned, in his opinion, fundamental principles of law and the Constitution, and not the defense of specific individuals or parties. He claimed that the government wanted to forcibly introduce to the Tribunal individuals who had not taken an oath before the President of the Republic of Poland, but had taken it in the Sejm before the Marshal of the Sejm, under the protection of the Marshal's Guard and on political indication. Bogucki assessed that such actions violated fundamental principles of law and the Constitution. He also accused that the ruling of the Constitutional Tribunal from December 2015, case no. K 34/15, was not being respected. As he wrote, this ruling indicated that the oath before the President of the Republic of Poland is not a trivial matter nor merely a formal ceremony. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #Konstytucja (translated)

BPM Chief Marcin Przydacz said in wPolsce.pl that the situation surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal resulted from legal errors of the parliamentary majority and the ruling camp, and above all from the desire to take control over this body. He added that in his opinion the ruling camp was simultaneously seeking this control and was unable to adhere to the law. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #prawo #Polska (translated)

Chrzanik cited Szejna's statement about the riots in France. Szejna reportedly said that union members and farmers joined the students, and that the right to strike in France is "sacred." He also accused extreme groups, such as Braun and the Confederation, of exploiting the struggle for rights in education. Chrzanik called this statement extremely foolish and pointed to Bosak's expression as the only appropriate comment. #Francja #strajk #prawa (translated)

Grzegorz Płaczek wrote that the Ministry of Health planned to introduce mandatory HPV vaccinations for children in Poland starting from 2027, despite opposition. He stated that on September 30, 2026, the Commission for the Codification of Criminal Law proposed raising the maximum fine for evading mandatory vaccinations from 1500 to 9000 PLN. Płaczek also indicated that governors could impose administrative fines on parents of up to 10,000 PLN at once and up to 50,000 PLN in total, regardless of any misdemeanor proceedings. According to him, the money could be deducted from accounts before the dispute with the state is resolved, and proceedings in administrative courts could last four years or longer. The author claimed that a similar system would apply to HPV vaccinations. He wrote that outside of North Macedonia, they are only recommended worldwide, and prevention should be based on information and informed decisions made by parents, not on financial sanctions. He advocated for the voluntary nature of HPV vaccinations and criticized the actions of the state. #szczepienia #zdrowie #prawo (translated)

Wojtek Spartan 2.0 Aristodemos - Spartiata wrote that Piotr was the target of political attacks and a victim of abuse of power. He claimed that officials beat him severely and subjected him to mental pressure and blackmail while in custody, and prevented him from contacting his defender. He added that Piotr did not succumb to the pressure and remained true to his principles. https://t.co/ePU7FGhxsX #PrawaCzłowieka #Sprawiedliwość #Protest (translated)

The Commissioner for Human Rights, Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram, expressed concern about the current situation surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal, warning of a lack of basic guarantees for the protection of civil rights and the failure to address important issues related to benefits, pensions, and taxes. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #RPO #prawaobywatelskie (translated)

The author accused Bogucki of incorrectly asserting that in Poland no one can become a judge without taking an oath before the president. He wrote that he did not know whether it was Bogucki's interpretation or that of Karol Nawrocki, and he cited Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution. According to the author, judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are chosen by the Sejm, and the president does not have constitutional powers to appoint or approve them. The author emphasized that the obligation to take an oath before the president arises from the law, not from the Constitution. He claimed that the president merely receives the oath, and the oath itself does not create the judge's mandate. He also referenced the Constitutional Tribunal's ruling in case K 34/15, which — as he wrote — clarified that the taking of the oath does not imply the president's involvement in shaping the Tribunal's composition. Finally, he criticized Bogucki for, in his opinion, presenting the Constitution according to the political needs of the President's Chancellery. #Konstytucja #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polska (translated)

Wąski wrote that a group of people was robbing a store belonging to a woman. He speculated that she might have previously voted for them and fought for their rights, and described the whole situation as "something beautiful." He added that one of the individuals was calming her down, saying that they would complete their task and leave. https://t.co/SMkoxb1wes #Polska #Społeczeństwo #PrawaKobiet (translated)

The author claimed that the media in the UAE paved the way for the division of Yemen into a northern part controlled by Iran and the Houthis and a southern part governed by separatists supported by the UAE. He also wrote that Iran and the Houthis were guided by the concept of the "divine right" of the Houthis to govern Yemen. #Jemen #konflikt #Iran #YE #AE #IR (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the policeman who allegedly held a restrained person by the throat and threatened them with death during an intervention should be held accountable for potential abuse of power, illegal use of violence, and criminal threats. He emphasized that the uniform does not provide immunity but rather entails special responsibility. He added that the case requires an investigation into both the officer's actions and the legality of the entire arrest, as well as the credibility of the allegations against the detainee. #Prawo #Sprawiedliwość #Policja (translated)