Search

Prem evaluated the recording from the body camera and pointed out nine violations that, in his opinion, were committed by the intervening individuals. He claimed that one of the police officers only provided their rank, without a name, and that the officers did not explain the actual reason for the identification. Referring to Article 15 of the Police Act was, as he wrote, insufficient to justify this action. According to Prem, there were also no legal or factual grounds for the identification, which he considered unlawful. The author also accused the police officers of violating the principle of least intrusive action as per Article 15(6) of the Police Act. He considered a mocking comment directed at the man and an approach within 45 cm to be a manifestation of psychological pressure and a violation of dignity. He also wrote that the order to move to another location had no legal basis. Prem asserted that the officers used physical force without prior calls to comply with the law and warnings required by Article 34 of the Act of May 24, 2013, on measures of direct coercion and firearms. He listed possible consequences: violation of personal inviolability under Article 217 of the Penal Code and potential abuse of power or failure to fulfill duties under Article 231 § 1 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of up to 3 years of imprisonment. He regarded the most significant issue to be the man's escape from the grip. According to Prem, if the grip was unlawful, the citizen would not, in principle, have committed an offense under Article 222 or Article 224 of the Penal Code, and self-defense against the unlawful action of a public officer would not be punishable. #policja #prawo #uczciwość (translated)

The author of the entry r00t wrote that the document commented on by Wójcik contradicted his assertion that Maciej Berek did not meet the formal requirements. According to the author, the Chancellery of the Sejm indicated that the application with Berek's candidacy was submitted on time by an eligible entity and contained the required elements, after which it was referred to the Justice and Human Rights Committee. The author added that during the committee meeting, Berek's performance of the legal advisor profession was discussed, and the candidate answered questions. The committee positively assessed his candidacy. r00t accused Wójcik of ignoring the course of the procedure and the documents, which — as he wrote — indicated something contrary to his assertion. #Polska #Prawo #KomisjaSprawiedliwości (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that the Left's lawyer Piotr Kusznieruk harshly criticized the police's actions towards Piotr. According to the arguments presented by Hübner, the man was not obligated to show documents, and the police officers did not provide a legal basis because — as Kusznieruk assessed — it would be illegal. Hübner also reported that Kusznieruk considered the surveillance of Piotr and his being hit before being identified as actions aimed at identifying the participants of the assembly in front of the Constitutional Tribunal. The policewoman was said to be outside the area of the demonstration and not performing security duties. Kusznieruk was also said to have indicated that the duty to comply with police orders applied to situations where officers were securing some event, not to a person walking on the sidewalk. According to the lawyer, Piotr could have felt threatened. #polityka #prawo #policja (translated)

Jacek Zarzecki wrote that the Provincial Veterinary Inspectorate issued health certificates for 21 animals taken from the Łączna Zoo to the Netherlands, including a tiger. According to him, the certificates were not issued by the county veterinarian supervising the zoo, who publicly stated that he saw no grounds for taking the animals, and was subsequently removed from the proceedings. Zarzecki pointed out that the police were supposed to designate a final destination for the animals, namely a private zoo. He asked on what legal basis the inspectorate took over the duties of the county veterinarian and from which account the certificates were issued. He also expressed doubts about whether each animal was examined before loading and whether its medical documentation, which — he wrote — was taken over by the prosecutor, was checked, and whether the tiger had a valid rabies vaccination. Zarzecki emphasized that the health certificate is an official document on which the credibility of Polish exports of animals and meat is based. He stated that any possible bending of procedures in this matter could undermine trust in the documents and procedures, and if EU institutions got involved, Poland would have to explain itself. #Zwierzęta #Weterynaria #Prawo (translated)

Monika Borkowska informed that Piotr's wife spoke out for the first time regarding his detention. The woman stated that the attempt to identify her husband did not follow the proper procedures, which led him to suspect that the individuals intervening with him were impersonating police officers. She accused the officers of unjustified assault and detention and appealed for their superiors to take consequences. Borkowska conveyed that Piotr's wife asked why the officers did not provide the basis for identification, the police officer did not introduce himself in the recording, and the female officer violated her husband's personal and even intimate space. She also wanted to know if the superiors would react to what she described as unprofessional conduct. The author of the post stated that she remained in contact with the woman, who asked for peace and anonymity. According to Borkowska, Piotr's wife thanked those supporting the family and those who published information and recordings online. The post also tagged Republika TV, Tomasz Sakiewicz, Marcin Kierwiński, Donald Tusk, K. Gałecka, Michał Rachoń, Jarosław Kaczyński, and GP Clubs. #policja #sprawiedliwość #prawaCzłowieka (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the revealed recordings raised questions about the reason for the police check on the man who was, as he suggested, connected to the protest. According to his reconstruction, the officers followed the man for several dozen meters, demanded his personal information without providing a specific reason for the check, and then incapacitated him inside the building. Kusznieruk noted that the man pushed the officers away and fled inside, but he believed that this did not explain the earlier decision to conduct a check. The author claimed that the man lost consciousness during the intervention, and the knife found with him was not presented as having been used. He also questioned the proportionality of the force used and whether the man deliberately attacked the policewoman when the window broke. Furthermore, he described that several hours later, the detained man was informed that he could meet with lawyer Magdalena Leszczyńska if he provided his details. According to Kusznieruk, the man did not know the lawyer and did not want to see her, while the police considered this a refusal to contact a defense attorney. Kusznieruk also criticized the statement by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who — as he wrote — linked the matter to President Nawrocki. He asked whether the police acted on the orders of superiors, collected data on demonstration participants, and previously observed the man. He directed questions to the Polish Police and the Ministry of Interior and Administration regarding who ordered the identification of Piotr and on what basis. He warned that if the identification of protesters occurred without legal grounds, it could mean using the state apparatus to control citizens. #Polska #Policja #protesty (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk stated that the footage from the body camera raised serious suspicions that the man may have been previously monitored as someone associated with the protest organization. He claimed that the police had been trying from the beginning to establish his identity and asked whether they were acting on orders, who issued those orders, and on what legal basis. Kusznieruk emphasized that the systematic gathering of data by the police on individuals participating in legal protests, without specific grounds for identification, would signify practices characteristic of an authoritarian state. He pointed out that participating in a protest is not a crime, and the police should protect the constitutional freedoms of citizens. He asked the police who ordered the identification of this man and why the officers were interested in him even before the intervention. #protesty #wolność #Polska (translated)

Sławek Jastrzębowski wrote that the police officers did not provide the legal basis for identification. He referred to the ruling of the Supreme Court from December 17, 2025, in case file No. II KK 473/25, brought in cassation by the Ombudsman. He pointed out that the court held that a citizen can refuse to provide data if the request has no legal basis, and the refusal does not constitute an offense. Jastrzębowski added that identification interferes with personal freedom and is subject to legal scrutiny, after which he demanded the immediate release of the policewoman and referred the case to the prosecutor. #prawo #policja #wolność (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that the recording showed police officers who — as he claimed — beat Mr. Piotr and were unaware of their rights. He maintained that the police cannot violate bodily integrity without legal grounds, and one of the officers had done so. He added that it was clear from the entire recording that the police officers did not provide any reason for their intervention. https://t.co/psR52cv92S #policja #prawa #nietykalność (translated)

Suw wrote to the Warsaw Police Headquarters that the identification shown in the recording might deviate from legal procedures. He asked whether it is normal to run after passersby and ask them for a short conversation. He assessed that the recording may be important for the representatives and added that people might be scared and flee when someone stops them without providing legal grounds and a reason. https://t.co/h0CcK0aEXD #Policja #Prawo #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Krzysztof Mazur wrote to the Warsaw Police Headquarters that in this country there is no obligation to show identification to the police. He accused them of not presenting the legal basis or reason for attempting to identify him. https://t.co/BuNKm6Grpr #Polska #Bezpieczeństwo #Prawo (translated)

NeoJudge Tuleya accused the Capital City Police Headquarters of detaining individuals without legal grounds. He wrote that the officers have gotten used to this, and criticized the order for a person already lying down to lie down, adding that the police are further compromising themselves. #Polska #Prawo #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The Warsaw police reported that the detained man initially refused to contact a lawyer or any other legal representative and only later decided to take advantage of it. According to the police, the man also refused to provide personal details, even during examinations in the hospital. The police stated that they respected his rights and could not force him to seek legal assistance. They announced the release of a recording of the actions involving the detainee and denied reports that he had a head wound. #Policja #Prawo #Zatrzymanie (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that the chairman of the National Commission of NSZZ "Solidarity," Piotr Duda, announced the official support of the union for the protest outside the Constitutional Tribunal. Duda said that union members would come there every day until victory and recalled that in the past — including in the dispute over the retirement age — they lost individual battles but won the entire fight. Duda criticized Prime Minister Donald Tusk, saying that his stance does not correspond to the declarations about restoring the rule of law. He assessed that the situation is unacceptable and announced that "Solidarity is entering the game" as a trade union involved in the defense of the Constitutional Tribunal. #Solidarność #protest #TrybunałKonstytucyjny (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska reported that due to concerns about the pacification of the town near the Constitutional Tribunal during the Saturday demonstration, lawyers from Ordo Iuris were ready to provide free legal assistance. She emphasized that peaceful assembly is a constitutional right and not a privilege granted by authorities, and provided the phone number 531 738 774. She advised detained individuals to immediately request a lawyer, memorize the official's badge number, and not sign any protocols they do not agree with, but to submit their objections to it. She added that a suspect may refuse to make statements. #OchronaPrawna #Prawo #Manifestacja (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska questioned why the police did not allow the lawyers to meet with Piotr so that he could personally confirm that he did not want legal assistance if such a statement was true. She expressed concern for the detainee and his health condition, adding that the attitude of the officers intensified their worries. #Polska #prawo #zdrowie (translated)

Rambo 2 criticized the Polish Police, claiming that they detained a person who was taken away by ambulance that morning and who did not have access to legal assistance. He also wrote that the family did not know what was happening to her and addressed the police in vulgar language. #Polska #Policja #pomoc (translated)

The author criticized Dubyna's post, accusing him of misrepresenting the division of powers, the competences of the Council of Ministers, the rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal, and the concept of a coup d'état. He wrote that the appointed team analyzing the systemic effects of the court and tribunal rulings did not seize judicial power and had no authority to overturn judgments, change decision-making panels, or issue orders to judges. The author stated that Dubyna referred to Article 190 of the Constitution while omitting the difference between the finality of Constitutional Tribunal rulings and the analysis of their legal effects. He also accused him of failing to take into account the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Xero Flor v. Poland and the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-448/23, which — as he wrote — concerned fundamental irregularities in the functioning of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. The author considered the designation of the appointment of the government analytical team as a coup d'état to be a manifestation of a misunderstanding of the principles of state functioning. He also criticized the comparison of the situation to a totalitarian system, stating that it was historically unfounded and offensive to those repressed by the communist state. He added that the use of capital letters and exclamation marks did not lend any legal or intellectual value to the statements. #prawo #konstytucja #Polska (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that Tomasz Sakiewicz, after beating Mr. Piotr, demanded from the police officers the legal basis for blocking the entrance, but did not receive a response. He added that later Sakiewicz asked the officers to identify themselves and also did not receive a reaction. Hübner assessed that the police officers broke the law because they were obligated to provide the legal basis and identify themselves. https://t.co/JzIb0tBUXR #Prawo #Policja #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)