Search

Pour que l'AfD fasse des scores de maboul, dans un pays qu'on pensait traumatisé à vie par tout ce qui est vaguement à droite, il faut vraiment que les gens n'en peuvent plus de leur extrême centre (jumeau du nôtre) et de cette UE, encore plus haïssable et minable que l'URSS... #AfD #Politique #UE

José Mourinho: “The best version of Vinicius Jr will come when he starts scoring goals”. “Of course, assists and working hard for the team is important. There is another Vini Jr that eliminated us with Benfica last season with incredibly good performances where he scores”. (translated)

8/8 CORRECT SCORES BOOM 💥💥💥 Como 🇮🇹 3:0 Parma 🇮🇹 Bodoe/Glimt 🇳🇴 3:0 Sandefjord 🇳🇴 Inter 🇮🇹 2:0 Udinese 🇮🇹 Leeds United 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 1:2 Newcastle 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Villarreal 🇪🇸 1:1 Betis 🇪🇸 Ludogorets 3:1 FK Septemvri Sofia Braga 🇵🇹 2:0 Estoril Praia 🇵🇹 FC Midtjylland 🇩🇰 2:1 Broendby IF 🇩🇰 #Fútbol #Resultados #Apuestas

🚨 SERIE A! 🇮🇹 FRANCO MASTANTUONO SCORES A BANGER FOR FIORENTINA! 🇦🇷 Venezia 1-1 Fiorentina 🎥 @TalkFootX https://t.co/XlqVmkZL8x #SerieA #Fiorentina #Calcio

🔴 Pourquoi l'Angleterre performe-t-elle aussi bien dans PISA ? Je vois 2 raisons : 1⃣ Les réformes du système 2⃣ La "triche" pour gonfler le score Bien sûr, on parle toujours de la première raison, mais je vais aussi évoquer la deuxième ici. 1⃣ Déjà, de quelles réformes et particularités anglaises parle-t-on ? 👉 Programmes plus exigeants ("Curriculum 2014") 👉 Retour aux fondamentaux (ex : calcul mental) 👉 Retour aux pédagogies explicites (exit le "ludique") 👉 Examens nationaux vraiment sélectifs 👉 Autonomie des établissements (ex : recrutement) 👉 Classes de niveaux (notamment en maths) Mais ça, vous l'avez sans doute déjà lu. En revanche, on parle moins de ce qui suit... 2⃣ Les scores anglais sont "gonflés" par la sélection de l'échantillon d'élèves retenu pour passer le test PISA. Pour l'illustrer, voici quelques chiffres sur les populations des établissements participant à PISA : 👉 24 % des élèves retenus pour participer à PISA sont éligibles aux "free school meals", contre 40 % des non-participants 👉 10,7 % des élèves retenus ont un soutien scolaire dédié ("special educational needs"), contre 25 % des non-participants Dans l'ensemble, l'OCDE demande aux pays qui participent à PISA de ne pas exclure plus de 5% des élèves de la "population-cible". 👉 En 2022, l'Angleterre était tout juste à 4,9% 👉 En 2025, ils se sont lâchés : 7,6% d'élèves "exclus" 👉 Pour comparaison, la France est en général à environ 3% Cette troublante "sur-sélection" des élèves anglais ne peut pas tout expliquer dans la bonne performance anglaise, mais on ne peut pas l'ignorer non plus. #PISA #Éducation #Angleterre

WORRYING TRENDS IN PISA SCORES The latest PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) results are out. PISA is a landmark program and the most comprehensive assessment of students across the word and its results provide invaluable information about the trends and https://t.co/5Rwja0vQ0l #PISA #EducationTrends #StudentAssessment #Nospecificcountrycodesarementionedinthetweet.

Reading scores plummet as ‘digital distraction’ harms students https://t.co/9pYElKGnFN via @ft #aiemergency is not just about safety/control and AGI... it's everywhere https://t.co/O4Bu5FJDUQ #DigitalDistraction #EducationCrisis #ReadingScores #Therearenospecificcountriesmentionedinthetweet.

⚠ Monday Brief ⚠ 🇮🇷 🇺🇸 Iran, U.S. Trade Tanker Attacks 🇨🇳 #China Injects $45 Billion in Banks, Insurers 🇯🇵 🇺🇸 Japan Likely Sold #Treasuries 🇩🇪 German Far Right Scores Best Result Ever 🇪🇺 #Eurozone Q2 GDP to Beat Expectations ... https://t.co/N6Eq5srNGj #Iran #China #Eurozone #IR #US #CN #JP #DE #EU

Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) and related gender ideological-belief measures were strongly associated with left-wing authoritarianism” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) was not simply standing in for being politically left-wing” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Support for coercion, punishment, and violence appears to be tied less to liberalism generally than to an authoritarian disposition organized around left-wing ideological content” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Gender ideology may function as an ideological accelerant” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Gender ideology may supply authoritarian psychology with a structured map of perceived outgroups, threat sources, and oppressor classes” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Dissent becomes not a legitimate position but a failure of professional duty or an act of harm” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “The same psychological machinery operates on the extreme left”- Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Violence can come to seem permissible or necessary” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Three findings pull in the same direction. People who strongly endorse gender ideology positions score dramatically higher on left-wing authoritarianism than their political identity alone would predict. Furthermore, both LWA (Left-Wing Authoritarianism) and CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) predicted support for political violence” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Together, these findings support the paper's core claim: gender ideology may function as an ideological accelerant, telling left-wing authoritarian psychology who the enemy is, why the situation is urgent, and—in those already disposed toward force—that violence is legitimate” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “One mechanism by which clinical content may translate into violence permission deserves note. Trans-Genocide Belief—the perceived likelihood that a genocide of individuals that identify as transgender is currently underway in the United States—is predicted to more strongly relate to CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) and LWA (Left-Wing Authoritarianism) than to political identity and to be associated with elevated justification for political violence” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “This prediction is consistent with broader research showing that perceived threat, existential threat, and collective victimhood can increase support for hardline, punitive, or exclusionary action against outgroups, particularly when paired with authoritarian dispositions or strong moral conviction (Armaly & Enders, 2022; Carriere et al., 2022; Hirschberger et al., 2016; Kljajić et al., 2025; Schori-Eyal et al., 2014; Skitka, 2010)” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Related work on moralization and violent intergroup conflict further suggests that when a political conflict is framed as a moral emergency involving dangerous or demonized outgroups, violence can come to seem permissible or necessary (Mooijman et al., 2018; Saguy & Reifen-Tagar, 2022)” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “The practical stakes are straightforward. Research frameworks for understanding authoritarianism have historically focused overwhelmingly on the political right, while analogous left-wing pathways have received far less attention. Yet federal agencies and public safety officials are concerned not only with ideology in the abstract, but with radicalization pathways: the content that tells people who to fear, why the situation is urgent, and when force becomes acceptable” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology “This study suggests that the same psychological machinery operates on the extreme left, and that it may be running through institutional channels—clinical guidelines, professional standards, credentialed expertise—that current threat-detection frameworks are not well designed to recognize” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Violence connected to gender ideology remains largely undocumented in the academic literature. This study provides a first systematic empirical look at the psychological infrastructure that makes such violence conceivable” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Both LWA (Left-Wing Authoritarianism) and CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) were significantly positively correlated with justification for political violence across all six targets” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Our main findings for youth starting treatment with blockers include: At baseline, about one-quarter of these youth had clinically concerning scores for depression and anxiety. About one-quarter reported having thought about suicide, and 8% reported having attempted suicide in the past. These numbers are on par with the population of middle school youth at large” - The Trans Youth Care - United States “Our main findings for youth starting treatment with GAH include: At baseline, about half of these youth had clinically concerning scores for depression and anxiety. About two-thirds reported having thought about suicide, and one-quarter reported having attempted. By two years after starting GAH, these youth showed increased scores for life satisfaction, appearance congruence (having the physical appearance of one's body match one's gender identity), positive emotions, and psychological well-being and decreased scores for depression and anxiety” - The Trans Youth Care - United States

What Chairman Mao and Dolores Umbridge Have in Common In Harry Potter, Dolores Umbridge is a more realistic villain than Voldemort: she gains power through titles, loyalty, conformity, and paperwork, not competence. She weakens Defense Against the Dark Arts by replacing practical preparation with Ministry-approved theory—her real talent is playing the institutional game. This echoes Hannah Arendt’s “banality of evil,” where ordinary people advance by obeying and enforcing a system. When loyalty matters more than ability, institutions start selecting for mediocrity. The parallel with Maoist China is stark. During the Cultural Revolution, Zhang Tiesheng was celebrated for submitting a blank exam and attacking “bookworms.” Despite poor results, political loyalty earned him a seat in the National People’s Congress. Mao’s promotion rule was effectively “red and expert”: political reliability outweighed competence. The consequences were catastrophic. Honest reporting was punished, so officials produced what Mao wanted to hear. False harvest data drove unrealistic targets and helped fuel the Great Leap Forward famine, which killed tens of millions. Education was politicized too: the Gaokao was abolished in 1966, and when admissions resumed, scores were replaced by class background, manual labor experience, and Party recommendations; the national exam returned only in 1977. Totalitarian systems don’t just remove capable people—they select for those politically reliable and morally compliant. Mediocrity shields leaders from rivals; reduced conscience makes coercion easier. Psychologist Andrew Lobaczewski called this pathocracy: rule by the pathological disordered, where normal institutions lose their ability to distinguish honest from manipulative. The system keeps its name and stated purpose while serving something else. The lesson: tyranny doesn’t require everyone to become evil. It requires enough people to stop recognizing the pathological. Once that moral filter disappears, institutions become vulnerable to exploitation—how psychopaths take over a society.

⚡️🇫🇷FLASH - Pour #LFI, 2027 ne se jouera pas seulement face aux autres candidats. La présidentielle se déroulera aussi dans un paysage médiatique où aucune grande chaîne d’information n’incarne la gauche de rupture, tandis qu’une la quasi totalité des grands #médias privés appartient à des #milliardaires dont les orientations économiques sont éloignées du programme insoumis. Sur les chaînes en continu, le spectre va globalement du centre gauche à l’extrême droite. #Franceinfo reste la plus à gauche, mais demeure très éloignée de la gauche de rupture et participe elle aussi à un paysage médiatique dont le centre de gravité s’est déplacé vers la droite. #BFMTV, historiquement plutôt centriste et longtemps très compatible avec le macronisme, s’oriente elle aussi vers l’extrême droite, notamment pour capter une partie du public de CNews, comme l’illustre le recrutement de Sonia Mabrouk, ancienne figure de CNews et d’Europe 1. #LCI, chaîne du groupe TF1 contrôlé par Bouygues, s’inscrit davantage dans une tradition de droite libérale traditionnelle, tandis que #CNews ferme le spectre avec une ligne largement ancrée à l’extrême droite. L’asymétrie est d’autant plus notable que Jean-Luc #Mélenchon reste crédité de scores à 2 chiffres pour 2027. Parmi les forces politiques installées à ce niveau, LFI est la seule à ne disposer d’aucun grand canal d’information continue proche de ses orientations économiques, sociales et politiques. Dans la #presse écrite, plusieurs titres entretiennent depuis des années une hostilité marquée envers LFI et Jean-Luc Mélenchon en faisant un positionnement éditorial assumé, notamment Le Point, Marianne, Franc-Tireur ou encore Le JDD. À cela s’ajoute le groupe #Bolloré, d’une tout autre ampleur. Son influence s’étend à la télévision, la radio et la presse avec CNews, Europe 1, Le JDD, JDNews ou Prisma Media, mais aussi à l’édition à travers Hachette, qui regroupe notamment Fayard, Grasset, JC Lattès, Stock, Calmann-Lévy ou Le Livre de Poche. Un écosystème puissant qui a fait de Jordan #Bardella un millionnaire où les mêmes thèmes, figures et batailles culturelles circulent d’un support à l’autre. Pour LFI, cet ensemble constitue aujourd’hui le pôle médiatique le plus puissamment et durablement opposé à sa ligne politique. Le rapport de forces tient aussi à la manière dont l’information est traitée : cadrages biaisés, #intox, déformations, débats orientés, plateaux déséquilibrés ou intérêts d’invités insuffisamment explicités. L’hostilité affichée de certains intervieweurs envers LFI peut même rendre ces séquences contre-productives pour les médias eux-mêmes, lorsque l’entretien ressemble davantage à un affrontement #militant qu’à une interview journalistique. LFI semble avoir tiré les leçons de cette expérience. Considérant que les dés sont trop souvent pipés sur certains plateaux traditionnels, le mouvement investit davantage les nouveaux médias numériques, les créateurs de contenus et ses propres canaux : YouTube, Twitch, TikTok ou formats longs. La chaîne YouTube de Jean-Luc Mélenchon a ainsi publié un 1er épisode de près d’1h30 consacré aux coulisses du début de la campagne, produit par le mouvement lui-même. À moins de 8 mois du 1er tour, la dynamique actuelle de Jean-Luc Mélenchon promet d’ailleurs de placer cette confrontation médiatique au 1er plan. Crédité jusqu’à 17% des intentions de vote à cette heure et en situation, dans certaines configurations, de disputer directement l’accès au second tour, le candidat insoumis devrait devenir un enjeu majeur pour les chefferies éditoriales des grands médias détenus par des milliardaires, dont beaucoup sont paniquées par son programme. À l’approche de 2027, LFI devra donc composer avec un double rapport de forces : celui de l’affrontement avec ses adversaires et celui d’un environnement médiatique largement défavorable à ses choix politiques. Cette dimension médiatique constituera alors l’un des paramètres les plus importants de la présidentielle… #LFI #Mélenchon #Médias