Search

Ida Gabrielsson criticized individuals from C, MP, and S who participated in Aktuellt. She argued that they seemed to lack confidence in C's ability to stick to its most left-leaning policies. According to her, they blamed V for C changing its prime minister candidate after the election, and they also criticized C for being open to governing together with a party founded by Nazis. At the same time, they, according to Gabrielsson, placed their hopes on V. Gabrielsson wrote that she wanted C to choose its values over Åkesson, ministerial posts, and as far-reaching a right-wing policy as possible. She called the disappointment over V not attending a meeting almost ridiculous, as she believed that S had, in less than a week, held several press conferences about keeping V out and pursuing a policy that was further to the right than Kristersson's. She stated that she could not find decent right-wing voters and that the responsibility lay with them. If C closed the door on Åkesson, those who won the election could, according to Gabrielsson, resume negotiations, give and take, and compromise. But she argued that C itself had to close that door. #politik #svenskpolitik #CochV (translated)

Ida Gabrielsson wrote that the Center Party could not be trusted as long as the party kept the door open for cooperation with the Sweden Democrats. She described the arrangement as a way to force a government with the Left Party excluded and maximum right-wing politics, rather than as cooperation. According to Gabrielsson, the Left Party would not achieve either a ban on profits in welfare or a billionaire tax by standing on the outside. She argued that the Tidö Agreement could not be compared to the January Agreement that Magdalena Andersson was offered to govern on. The Sweden Democrats had, according to her, not been able to threaten to switch to Andersson, while Thand Ringqvist had shown a willingness to do the opposite. Gabrielsson wrote that the Center Party had previously chosen the red-green alternative because the party did not accept dependence on the Sweden Democrats, and that it would not stay if the politics became left-oriented. She hoped that Birgitta Ohlsson and other Center Party members were serious about values being the most important, and that the members would permanently close the door to the Sweden Democrats. Gabrielsson also warned that a change of prime minister candidate after the election and a yes to what Annie Lööf rejected in 2018 could lead to the Center Party, like the Liberals, going into the 2030 election with the ambition of governing with the Sweden Democrats or being out of Parliament. #svpol #politik #demokrati (translated)

The writer stated that Åkesson's idea of an "open Swedishness" did not belong in a democracy. They described it as a totalitarian notion where people's thoughts, feelings, values, beliefs, memories, and identities became a matter of state concern. https://t.co/tZkatTKr0o #demokrati #yttrandefrihet #identitet #SE (translated)

Lars Söderfjell, head of equities at Ålandsbanken, believes that Verisure is undervalued by investors and that the company is worth much more than its current valuation, which has led to an increase in the stock price following news that the private equity firm CVC may want to buy out the company. #Verisure #Börs #Aktier (translated)