Search

Carl Eos agreed with Jimmie Åkesson's reasoning in Expressen about the Sweden Democrats' role in cooperation with the center-right parties. Åkesson had written that the Sweden Democrats (SD) had been driving many reforms, but that the parties holding ministerial positions had received visibility when the reforms were implemented. He also pointed out that the cooperation had limited SD and asked why voters would choose the party over the Moderates if the center-right was perceived as good enough even on issues where SD had taken the lead. Eos wrote that the center-right parties had been able to showcase successes within SD's strong policy areas, while SD had not made corresponding advances in other areas. He argued that the parliamentary election in 2026 would largely be about issues where SD was weaker and, to a large extent, not about policy issues. Eos also noted that both Ulf Kristersson and Jimmie Åkesson had said that the time after Tidö had begun, and wrote that this would likely create discussion. https://t.co/JWjMHlH2Ri #Sverigedemokraterna #politiskdebatt #val2026 (translated)

DrTallinger wrote that the political deadlock surrounding refugee policy forced the Center Party to choose between approaching its political opponents or cooperating with the Sweden Democrats, with whom the party, according to the author, had politically in common in practice. The latter, according to the post, would cost the Center Party its reputation among political allies with high demands for political correctness. The author described the question of how many refugees Sweden could take in as peripheral and compared it to a company's decision on charity. According to DrTallinger, the main task of politics was to drive Sweden towards profitability and to safeguard the interests of citizens. The author also claimed that Sweden had been turned into one big refugee camp, at the expense of the purpose of politics. By comparison, DrTallinger wrote that Coca-Cola would not abandon profitability and donate all its money to Pepsi or small soda producers on the grounds that they also had a right to profit. The author concluded by asserting that the country's future depended on a few women, whom he described derogatorily and accused of having lost touch with why they started engaging in politics. https://t.co/DcZ3y69mPc #politik #Sverige #flyktingfrågan (translated)

Christian Peterson wrote that ETC, with the support of the law firm DLA Piper, had tried to delay the release of its share register. He stated that left-wing activists had invested 5,590,000 kronor in the group and that among the owners was Skiftet, which he described as a social democratic troll factory. According to Peterson, a prominent social democrat had personally invested 510,000 kronor. Peterson claimed that the business's profit margin was based on state media support and that the group had received more than 405 million kronor since 2005. He also recounted social democrat Jan Emanuel's comment that the stock was something one could brag about at an expensive lobster dinner in Söder. https://t.co/7EsDPgjlr9 #politik #mediestöd #vänsteraktivism (translated)

Christian Peterson wrote that the social democrat Per Molander had invested 510,000 kronor in the grant-funded ETC. He stated that Molander had worked at the Government Offices and had long criticized profit interests in welfare. When Peterson asked about the stock purchase, which he said was marketed with a return of 5.5 percent, Molander replied briefly and eventually closed the door. https://t.co/7EsDPgjlr9 #politik #sverige #välfärd (translated)

Christian Peterson stated that he contacted the shareholders by phone and through home visits to ask how they felt about making a profit in a business that was largely financed by taxpayers' money. He also wanted to know how the business differed from the welfare companies that ETC itself criticized. #aktieägare #välfärd #skattepengar (translated)