Search

Javier Tebas wrote that the events of October 18 confirmed his earlier accusations against Real Madrid. He recalled that on October 16 he named the journalist from "El Debate," Tomás González-Martín, as the spokesperson for the club's management narrative. On the same day, Real responded with a statement in which, as reported by Tebas, they distanced themselves from the opinions of journalists outside the club. Tebas claimed that he asked Real to deny the comparison to Negreira that the journalist allegedly attributed to club sources, as well as allegations that La Liga was harming the club regarding the scheduling of matches. He also demanded the publication of all of Real’s requests for changes to the schedule and information on how many of them were considered. According to Tebas, on October 18, Real Madrid TV attacked him again, and a section of fans coordinated and supervised by the club displayed a banner with the slogan "Tebas and Negreira." He asked whether the club would also present this as an opinion unrelated to Real. He also accused the management of inciting hostility among fans toward specific individuals; he cited an earlier warning that the club had set Real fans against him and prevented him from moving freely on the street. Tebas accused the management of manipulating the message and spreading false information. He also referred to Real's publication from October 17 about "international media": he stated that the materials from Reuters, BBC, and "L’Équipe," repeated by the club, indicated that it was Real who requested them, and presenting the press reports as support for the club was manipulation. He added that his questions about sources, accusations, and the schedule had remained unanswered since October 16. #RealMadrid #LaLiga #Tebas (translated)

Sławek Jastrzębowski wrote that the recording showed how a woman attacked Piotr and violated his bodily integrity while he was defending himself and trying to escape. He emphasized that in his opinion, everything was visible in the video. #przemoc #bezpieczeństwo #wydarzenia (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that the court did not grant the prosecution's request for a month of temporary detention for Piotr. According to Malewski, the prosecutor justified the request with concerns that Piotr might hide and an assessment that there is a high probability of him committing further crimes. Malewski wrote that together with lawyers Magda Prządka and Magda Majkowska, he convinced the court that there were no grounds for imposing detention. He claimed that it was not sufficiently substantiated that Piotr had committed the alleged acts and that Friday's events should be treated as an incident requiring thorough explanation. According to Malewski, Piotr has a permanent place of residence, is socially engaged, and is a firefighter in the volunteer fire department, so there is no real risk that he would hide. He added that after the defenders reached him, Piotr, feeling safer, started limited cooperation with the authorities. Malewski also emphasized that the lack of cooperation is Piotr's right and should not be a basis for preventive measures. Malewski also assessed that the forecast for further criminal activity had no rational basis. He wrote that Piotr had not been convicted and that his behavior on Friday was not aimed at committing the alleged acts, which, in Malewski's view, undermined the legal qualification adopted by the prosecution. He informed that the court did not apply other preventive measures, such as police supervision, and that Piotr would respond to the charges at liberty. He added that assistance was provided as part of a procedural intervention by Ordo Iuris. #wolność #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska announced that the arrest hearing regarding Piotr, whose detention she described as brutal, was to take place that day at 11:30 at the District Court for Warsaw-Center in Warsaw. The detention was related to events surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polska #Władza (translated)

The Stock Information published a Sunday summary, stating that Polish diplomats were attacked in Israel, and the USA offered Russia the sale of gas to Europe in exchange for a share in profits. According to the post, riots broke out in large cities of Portugal and Albania and in Milan, while in France they affected 400 cities and indicated a loss of control over the situation. The author cited data from the French Ministry of the Interior about 550,000 demonstrators and AFP about 880,000, also mentioning heatmaps. Among other information, the author noted that 7% of the world's population had cryptocurrencies, homes in the USA were the least affordable in history, deliveries of Abrams tanks to Poland were coming to an end, and Biedronka and Lidl were not once in the top three cheapest stores. He also mentioned that the Kremlin announced the imminent announcement of new USA-Russia agreements, while Elon Musk considered AI and robots the only way to repair the USA. According to the post, Iran announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and three tankers were on fire; Volodymyr Zelensky warned that in the event of Ukraine's collapse, 20 million of its residents would flee to the EU. The author also wrote about the intensifying fighting on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and quoted Pete Hegseth's words about the largest military buildup by China in the Pacific. He asked the audience for their assessment of bottle return machines, and on the occasion of Tie Day, he posted a joke about pasta made from threads. #Świat #Wydarzenia #Polityka (translated)

JFJ (JackFromJersey) wrote that Mark Zuckerberg suspended pages informing about marches or gathering their participants. He also claimed that Elon Musk limited the visibility of the slogan "NoKings" on Twitter while simultaneously promoting events in France. According to JFJ, both sought to silence the protests and hide their scale. https://t.co/hf7m8rxzrc #protesty #media #Zuckerberg (translated)

Uszi wrote that the animals were taken from the Łączna Zoo, and the results of the prosecutor's examination were supposed to be known before the services entered the area. He cited disclosed chats of the activists, from which — he claimed — it followed that they had divided the animals among themselves a few days before the operation. According to Uszi, both activists and the Dutch pointed to the key role of the Ministry of Climate and Environment, and Minister Paulina Hennig-Kloska accused others of lying in their statements. The author also wrote that the taken tiger would not return to Poland. He claimed that Stichting Leeuw sends the seized predators to a private reserve in Africa, where luxurious safaris can be booked through Booking.com. #Zoo #Wydarzenia #OchronaZwierząt (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the revealed recordings raised questions about the reason for the police check on the man who was, as he suggested, connected to the protest. According to his reconstruction, the officers followed the man for several dozen meters, demanded his personal information without providing a specific reason for the check, and then incapacitated him inside the building. Kusznieruk noted that the man pushed the officers away and fled inside, but he believed that this did not explain the earlier decision to conduct a check. The author claimed that the man lost consciousness during the intervention, and the knife found with him was not presented as having been used. He also questioned the proportionality of the force used and whether the man deliberately attacked the policewoman when the window broke. Furthermore, he described that several hours later, the detained man was informed that he could meet with lawyer Magdalena Leszczyńska if he provided his details. According to Kusznieruk, the man did not know the lawyer and did not want to see her, while the police considered this a refusal to contact a defense attorney. Kusznieruk also criticized the statement by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who — as he wrote — linked the matter to President Nawrocki. He asked whether the police acted on the orders of superiors, collected data on demonstration participants, and previously observed the man. He directed questions to the Polish Police and the Ministry of Interior and Administration regarding who ordered the identification of Piotr and on what basis. He warned that if the identification of protesters occurred without legal grounds, it could mean using the state apparatus to control citizens. #Polska #Policja #protesty (translated)

Bartosz Malewski wrote that the detention protocol and charges were presented to Piotr 30 hours after his arrest. He assessed that this was the first properly conducted action in the proceedings and added that during this time Piotr was removed from handcuffs for the first time. According to Malewski, Piotr was charged with forcing police officers to refrain from taking action and violating the bodily integrity of the police officers. In the case of one of the officers, the charge was said to include actions threatening loss of life or serious bodily harm. Malewski cited the provisions: Article 224 § 2 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 222 § 1a of the Penal Code in relation to Article 57a § 1 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 11 & 2 of the Penal Code, as well as Article 224 § 2 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 222 § 1 of the Penal Code in relation to Article 57a § 1 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 11 & 2 of the Penal Code. He stated that Piotr did not admit to the alleged acts and refused to provide explanations, but he submitted an extensive statement about the course of events from his own perspective and about the period of detention so far. Malewski also informed that a request had been submitted, among other things, for an examination of Piotr's health status. #policja #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska reported that together with lawyer Magdalena Przadka and lawyer Bartosz Malewski, she met with Piotr, who — as she wrote — was brutally arrested the day before in connection with the events surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal. She added that Piotr presented a statement for the media. https://t.co/n2eX1Oyclt #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #PrawaCzłowieka #Sprawiedliwość (translated)

Tomasz Witaszek wrote to Jakub Wiech that Polish supporters of Donald Trump would portray his actions as a multidimensional strategy aimed at Russia anyway. He added that the argument about Trump's concern for his own country did not convince him, since the president was doing "average" in that regard, and he asked what he had changed for Poland. He also stated that Trump's supporters were most pleased by the outrage of the left. #Polska #Trump #WydarzeniaPolityczne (translated)

Tomasz Lipiński described the state of knowledge at 8:00 AM as "verified facts." He wrote that a man was calmly walking away from the officers who were monitoring him due to suspicious behavior. According to Lipiński, 300 meters from the TK, the man entered the premises of his association and attacked a female officer. He had a closed knife in his pocket. Lipiński also wrote that the man, lying on the ground and losing consciousness, hit the female officer's head against the glass door, which broke, and then lost consciousness himself. The officers were supposed to put handcuffs on him, and after he regained consciousness, transport him to the police station. There, he was said to have refused to meet with a lawyer and probably ate the recordings from the officers' cameras. The author also claimed that the man convinced the duty officer to turn off the lights and pretended that the police station was closed. An update was promised. #Fakty #Wydarzenia #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The article describes the dramatic events on the Road of Death between Kramatorsk and Druzhkivka, where Ukrainian soldiers are fighting against Russian air attacks, trying to protect their lives and others despite the constant threats from drones and soaring bombs. #Ukraina #wojna #drony (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska stated that lawyer Magdalena Prządka from Ordo Iuris was at the police station on Wilcza Street in Warsaw and demanded to contact the man who had been brutally detained that day in connection with the events surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal. As Majkowska reported, the police spokesman assured that contacting the defender was not a problem, yet Prządka still could not meet with the detainee. Majkowska reminded, citing Article 245 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, that the detained person is entitled to immediate contact and a direct conversation with a lawyer. #PrawaCzłowieka #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polska (translated)