Search

The author of the entry rated it as a great interview with Brigadier General Nowak, the Operational Commander. The conversation concerned the capabilities of the Polish Air Force and air defense, Russian armaments in these areas, and changes in NATO's operational approach. https://t.co/znNTIU7o3t #wojsko #NATO #siłypowietrzne #PL #RU #NATO (translated)

Poland, by investing in the purchase of weapons, must also invest in the development of the domestic defense industry to ensure the independence of servicing and modernizing equipment, which is crucial for the efficiency of the army and serves the long-term interests of the state. #PrzemysłObronny #Polonizacja #ZbrojeniaPolski (translated)

The author of the post wrote that the main message from the interview with K. Nawrocki was the statement that the threat from Russia had not changed drastically. He pointed out that in this context, undermining of fighter jets, consultations with allies, armaments, SAFE, civil defense, and strengthening borders appeared to be actions taken in excess. #Rosja #Bezpieczeństwo #Zbrojenia #PL (translated)

Dr. Coolfonpl wrote that Wolski was gaining material and immaterial benefits from cooperation with arms companies, including those from Poland and Korea. He linked media support for sending equipment to Ukraine with coercing increased purchases, for which — he stated — hundreds of billions were paid. https://t.co/gbarajM247 #Wojna #Ukraina #Zbrojenia (translated)

The author of the post assessed that U.S. policy has led to record prices for diesel fuel, and that Donald Trump is now buying it from Vladimir Putin, thus supporting the financing of the war against Ukraine. He noted that Poland is spending billions on armaments in relation to this same war, and ended the post with an ironic thank you to Trump. #USA #paliwo #Trump #USA #RU #UA (translated)

Dawid Kamizela wrote that he was pleased with the progress in building the capacity that would enable the production of modern short-range missiles in Poland within a few years. He assessed that failing to utilize these activities and the investments made in the FCM and CAMM-MR programs would be a huge waste. https://t.co/Qx7idutnOJ #Polska #technologia #zbrojenia (translated)

The head of the Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland, Zbigniew Bogucki, said that Poland has never been closer to establishing a permanent base on its territory. He added that Donald Trump attributed this to the policies and courage of President Karol Nawrocki. Bogucki indicated that the foundation of Poland's security is its soldiers, the army, armaments, and the effort of the entire nation, while the second pillar remains the United States. Criticizing Donald Tusk, he described his actions as political theater. He recalled that Tusk previously said that one movement would be enough, but — as Bogucki noted — he was not the prime minister at that time. He added that "the alibi is over," and the price at the station should be 5.19 PLN that day. Bogucki also accused Tusk of burdening drivers during record-high fuel prices to save the budget and prepare next year's budget, which — as he stated — would finance another "election sausage." #Polska #wojsko #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Michał Dworczyk reported that a draft law on mandatory military training for parliamentarians has been submitted to the Sejm. He wrote that it would apply to members of the Sejm and Senate up to 60 years of age, including MEPs, and would last for 58 days: 30 days of theoretical classes at the War Studies Academy and 28 days of field training. Parliamentarians could apply for alternative service, for example in the medical sector, and submit applications to the Marshal of the Sejm or Senate. The proposal would also foresee the possibility of parliamentarians serving in the Territorial Defense Forces, similar to the National Guard in the USA. Dworczyk justified the proposal by the need for universal defense training and the preparation of personnel reserves. He wrote that the Development Plus Association was the first to raise this issue, and politicians should set an example and serve the public interest. According to him, additional training would improve the quality of defense policy and demonstrate that individuals seeking office are ready to fulfill the constitutional duty of defending the homeland. #szkoleniewojskowe #Polska #obrona (translated)

Mr. Nawrocki, Unfortunately, I listened to this hmmm "message" and checked it against the documents. And, as usual, I have a problem. A big one. Because when you set aside the gestures, the teleprompter, and the political phrases, what remains is a series of facts mixed with half-truths, altered chronology, forecasts presented as certainties, and accusations that are not even confirmed by the documents of your own Office and a mass of other manipulations. Step by step. "The campaign promise of fuel at 5.19." No. Mr. Donald Tusk’s specific statement about 5.19 PLN was made in JUNE 2022. Parliamentary elections were scheduled for August 8, 2023. Only then did the election campaign begin in the sense of the Electoral Code. But it gets much more interesting with your quote... In the message, you connected 5.19 PLN, "one simple decision," and... a VAT reduction 🤦‍♂️ However, in the original statement about 5.19, Tusk talked about the MARGINS of Orlen and Lotos. And in a later statement about "one decision," he also talked about limiting Orlen's profits. Not about VAT! 🤦‍♂️ You are manipulating the Prime Minister's statement, and you are using the institution of the Address to the Nation for that... Exactly the same version about VAT was spread by Mr. Bogucki in the morning, but in his case, nothing surprises me anymore. A coincidence? Let’s move on. You claim that your project would cause "an immediate drop in fuel prices of over 2 PLN." Meanwhile, your OWN justification explicitly states that the mechanism DOES NOT START when the law comes into force. First, specific market conditions must occur. Then the Council of Ministers MAY issue a regulation. Only then does the mechanism begin to work. Where is the "immediate" here? Did you read your "own" project? Or are you just repeating this nonsense from Mr. Przydacz? Moreover, earlier materials from KPRP talked about an ESTIMATE of 1.70–2.60 PLN 🤦‍♂️ In the address, the estimate has already turned into a guaranteed effect 🤦‍♂️ Next, you say that the project is "good for the budget"... Meanwhile, your own justification predicts a loss of up to 600 million PLN just from the retail sales tax and further, unestimated costs of any potential excise tax reduction. I ask again - did you read your own project? Because you probably didn’t write it manually... Even more interesting. In the address: "The government bears full responsibility for fuel prices." In the justification of your project: market disruptions have an "objective character and are independent of entrepreneurs and the government".... So please decide. Full responsibility of the government or factors independent of the government? Because both versions cannot be true at the same time 🤦‍♂️ "The Marshal of the Sejm freezes the project." The project was submitted on September 18. On the same day, it was directed to the Legislative Office and BEOS. Then for opinions and consultations. Moreover, KPRP talked about the possibility of "freezing" as early as September 17 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ THE DAY BEFORE THE PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE SEJM! So first, a narrative about freezing was created, and only later did the Marshal receive the bill 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Are you communicating with the rest of the "experts" in your office?? Next, we hear that the government deliberately keeps prices high because it wants to profit from VAT and dividends from Orlen. Proof? None was provided! A higher price may mean higher nominal VAT revenues. Orlen can pay dividends to shareholders. But one does not imply the other: this is NOT proof that the government deliberately keeps fuel prices high. This is attributing a motive without providing evidence 🤦‍♂️ Then you sign the law and say: "Every zloty obtained from this law must be spent on reducing fuel prices." A moment earlier, you conceded that the law DOES NOT CONTAIN a mechanism for passing that money on to reduce prices 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Exactly. So it "mustn't." This is your political demand, not the legal effect of the signed law 🤷‍♂️ Moody’s? Yes. Here, the fact is a fact: Poland's rating was lowered from A2 to A3. But why was there no information that at the same time, the outlook was changed from negative to STABLE? Why does the rating decision then create a vision that "tomorrow there may not be enough for pensions and armaments"? #Polska #Polityka #Fakty (translated)

Niemieckie media, w tym Bild, podkreślają, że Polska przygotowuje się na rosnące zagrożenie ze strony Rosji, inwestując w zbrojenia i podejmując działania strategiczne mające na celu odstraszanie Moskwy, przy jednoczesnym przygotowywaniu ludności na możliwy kryzys. #Polska #Rosja #NATO

Wiesz, co chcę, żeby zrobił (Zełenski – red.)? Układ. Chcę, żeby dogadał się z Putinem i żeby Putin dogadał się z nimZamiast deklaracji o zbrojeniach Trump powrócił do swojego stałego postulatu: wezwał Kijów i Moskwę do natychmiastowego zawarcia porozumienia pokojowego. #Trump #Ukraina #siatkówka

Zapomnieliście dodać, że @pisorgpl głosowało przeciwko 180 mld złotych na zbrojenia głównie z polskiego przemysłu zbrojeniowego. Wasza posłanka mówiła „złom” na produkty polskiej zbrojeniówki. A i jeszcze, że obecny rząd @KosiniakKamysz połowę środków wydaje w polskim przemyśle zbrojeniowym, a wy ok 20%. Pięknej soboty 😉 #polityka #zbrojenia #przemysł

⁨Ukraina w 4 lata dostała od UE więcej pieniędzy niż Polska! od początku obecności w Unii Ukraina - 216,7 mld euro Polska - 175,1 mld euro Liczbę podaje Rada Unii Europejskiej. Całkowite wsparcie dla Ukrainy od początku wojny wynosi 216,7 mld euro. Obejmuje pomoc finansową, wojskową, dochody z zamrożonych rosyjskich aktywów i koszty utrzymania uchodźców. Saldo netto Polski z budżetem Unii od 1 maja 2004 roku to około 175,1 mld euro. Nasuwa się oczywiste pytanie: czy organizacja, która dba o cudze interesy niż o własnych członków nam się w ogóle opłaca? Pamiętajmy, że te 216,7 mld euro dla Ukrainy to również nasze pieniądze. To Ty Polaku się na to zrzucałeś! Czy ktoś cię pytał, czy wolisz płacić na Ukrainę zamiast na własny kraj? I to nie koniec. W kwietniu Rada zgodziła się na dodatkową pożyczkę dla Ukrainy w wysokości 90 mld euro na lata 2026 i 2027. Trzydzieści miliardów pójdzie na budżet, sześćdziesiąt na zbrojenia i przemysł obronny. Osiem miliardów już wypłacono. Czechy, Węgry i Słowacja odmówiły poparcia. Polska, ustami Donalda Tuska, to zrobiła Żadnych nowych zobowiązań finansowych wobec Ukrainy!⁩ #Ukraina #Polska #UE

Prezydent @NawrockiKn spotkał się przy okazji obecności na Polish-American Economic Summit w nowojorskiej siedzibie Instytutu Pileckiego z przedstawicielami: ✅Lockheed Martin ✅Boeinga ✅Palantira Rozmowy dotyczyły realizacji kontraktów zbrojeniowych dla polskiej armii i #Polska #Zbrojenia #Współpraca #PL #US