Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

Six months before the election, the French Mileistes believed that Philippe and Attal had no chance of winning, as they would have to account for Emmanuel Macron's record. They criticized them for not proposing anything and judged their work to be mediocre. The movement considered Retailleau's draft program interesting, while regretting that it lacked details and did not plan to address pensions. They believed that his campaign would be difficult due to his tenure at the Ministry of the Interior and that he had already lost the battle against Lisnard. The French Mileistes advised him to quickly rally behind the latter. Regarding Lisnard, they noted a favorable dynamic on social media, in polls, and for the growth of his party. They described him as a convinced liberal and believed he was the only one who could convince retirees to accept a reduction in their pensions. However, they found it difficult to assess his program, as few definitive elements had been published, and wondered if he could make up for his lack of notoriety in six months. According to them, he would also have to respond to accusations of weakness from the right and potential compromise with the Macronist center. They believed he needed to convince 30 to 40% of the French to embrace liberalism. The French Mileistes considered Marine Le Pen the clear favorite of the election but described her party as historically socialist in economic terms. They praised the change in tone related to the recent presentation of a budget she wanted to be responsible, while judging her calculations so poor that it could, according to them, be seen as dishonesty or amateurism. They believed that without a change in economic direction, she risked leading the country to bankruptcy. Concerning Zemmour, they recalled his historically antiliberal position and attributed a genuine communication effort in favor of liberalism to Sarah Knafo. They considered his change in economic discourse credible, as they saw the economy as secondary for Zemmour, but believed that his budget lacked credibility if it aimed to simultaneously reduce the deficit and taxes. They asserted that Zemmour suffered from a very bad image in public opinion and had almost no chance of winning. In their eyes, R! should have presented Knafo. #Élections2024 #PolitiqueFrançaise #Libéralisme (translated)

The French Mileistes wrote that Marine was largely the favorite to become president and that the country, tired of the situation, wanted to try something else. However, they found her economic program to be little credible, claiming that the announced budget was fanciful, that the intended savings were largely overestimated and that the projected tax revenues made no sense. According to them, the program proposed 140 billion euros in savings, while the actual expected savings could be counted "on the fingers of one hand." They estimated that the economy was not a priority for the RN, unlike immigration, security, and national unity, and advised Marine to entrust the budget preparation to Ifrap, the Montaigne Institute, or private audit firms. They specified that their advice was motivated by their concern for the country. The French Mileistes added that voters could be convinced by what they termed an imaginary program, but that its implementation at the Élysée would be more difficult. They described the country as being in a state of semi-bankruptcy, with out-of-control rates, and estimated that a solid economy was necessary to pacify the country. They finally called on Marine to present a credible project before the campaign, stating that the honor of the country was at stake. #Politique #Économie #Élections (translated)

The account Les Mileistes Français stated that Nicolas paid between 60 and 70% in taxes, while also bearing many other expenses. It notably mentioned a surcharge on insurance related, according to him, to the increase in looting episodes, the cost of a private school for his children, distant housing, and security systems, as well as health, cafeteria, daycare, and transportation expenses, which he claimed he had to pay at full price. The account also mentioned a six-month wait to see a specialist, a car that had become expensive due to ecological standards, thousands of euros in fuel taxes, and the contribution to the funding of social housing in his building. It added that Nicolas was suffering from inflation on his savings, was excluded from aid, had to hear calls for more solidarity, and was waiting three years for his children's attackers to be judged. Finally, it denounced the insults that Nicolas would suffer in public and subsidized media, before asking when he would stop participating in this system, which he described as "shit." #Impôts #Injustice #QualitéDeVie (translated)

The French Mileistes reported having long seen comments accusing David Lisnard of being particularly repressive during the Covid crisis. Living on the Côte d'Azur and working in Cannes, the author stated that he went to the city every day outside of confinement periods and was then worried about what he perceived as an authoritarian drift justified by health reasons. The author explained that Lisnard, the mayor of Cannes, had not convinced him at first. However, he remembered a piece by the mayor published in Le Figaro during the crisis, where he, according to his account, criticized bureaucracy, cited Tocqueville, and denounced the constraints related to movement certificates. This stance gave him moral support while he read authors from the Austrian School of economics and worried about freedoms. The French Mileistes also reported that a bookstore in Cannes, located near their office, had remained open despite the bans and had garnered attention in the national press. According to the author, Lisnard had publicly supported it, went there to buy a book, and asked Roselyne Bachelot to stop its forced closure by the National Police, without success. The author described him as one of the few elected officials to openly defend this type of local resistance and indicated that he had also accused Emmanuel Macron of using the vaccination pass for political purposes. The author acknowledged that Lisnard had also had beaches sprayed with hydrogen peroxide and actively supported vaccination. He believed that the mayor had favored targeted, anticipated, and local measures rather than general restrictions, and presented the Covid period as proof of his courage and sincerity. He concluded that he would not forget that Lisnard had, in his opinion, defended freedoms while almost all other elected officials turned away from them. #Liberté #Politique #CôteDAzur (translated)

French Mileists claimed that Americans had just invented a flying car and presented this advancement as one of the American innovations that have transformed the world in the last twenty years. They cited AI, smartphones, film photography, cloud computing, mass-produced autonomous and electric cars, reusable rockets, streaming, and social networks. They also mentioned quantum computing, next-generation supersonic planes, and mini nuclear power plants as upcoming innovations. The account estimated that European intellectuals would probably downplay this advancement and called on Europe to reconnect with the ambition of conquest and change. It judged that the continent had mentally remained in 1998 and was no longer participating, in its opinion, in writing the future. https://t.co/70LUch3w0I #Innovation #Technologie #Futur (translated)

The French Mileists described the position taken by David Amiel, the Minister of Public Accounts, as historic, asserting that he had characterized the French retirement and health system as a "Ponzi scheme." They congratulated him for what they presented as a cold and realistic observation. https://t.co/h2pDqEaeiV #Retraite #Santé #Politique (translated)

The French Mileistes have established a ranking of the annual spending cuts announced for 2032: David Lisnard topped the list with 200 billion euros, according to intentions whose figures had not been disclosed, followed by Bruno Retailleau with 177 billion, the exact amount of which had not yet been detailed. They then cited Éric Zemmour and Sarah Knafo with "at least 140 billion," Marine Le Pen with 140 billion, Gabriel Attal with 75 billion, and Édouard Philippe with 35 billion. They indicated that Jean-Luc Mélenchon proposed, in their view, an increase in spending of 250 billion per year and labeled the entries of Philippe and Mélenchon as clowns. The group specified that the figures came from political leaders and their parties. They considered many of them fanciful, claimed they would contest them during the campaign, and excluded the possibility that a tax increase could be deemed a saving. They stated that the deficit currently stands at 170 billion euros per year and would reach 270 billion by 2032 without measures, due to rising costs of interest, health, and retirement. According to them, reducing taxes would therefore require at least 200 billion euros in savings. They urged Lisnard to publish his figures quickly, believing that his first place would otherwise be illusory. #Economie #Politique #Déficit (translated)

French Mileists asserted that the president of the Constitutional Council announced the day before that the sovereign people could not amend the Constitution by referendum. They described this situation as bureaucratic dictatorship and called for the abolition of the Constitutional Council. They added that Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and New Zealand did not have one and that their democracy was faring better than in France. They identified a Parisian elite as a threat to democracy and called for its removal. #Démocratie #Constitution #Référendum (translated)

The French Mileistes proposed to replace Parcoursup with a national exam lasting one week for final-year students, covering all subjects. He suggested identical grading regardless of the place of study, with anonymous papers, and that candidates with the best scores should be given priority in choosing their university or preparatory class. He added that he did not understand why this idea had not been considered earlier. #Baccalauréat #Éducation #ConcoursNational (translated)

French Milei supporters published a translation of a tweet from Javier Milei, in which the Argentine president accused socialism of claiming causes such as disability, retirees, or public universities to justify, in his opinion, uncontrolled and untransparent spending and bureaucratic structures. Milei claimed that audit requests were often presented as an attack against the concerned individuals, and that opening accounts revealed intermediaries, advocacy organizations, and taxpayer-funded privileges. He argued that this mechanism had been observed in Argentina and other countries, to the detriment of people who truly needed help and Argentine taxpayers. He demanded the publication of all accounts and contracts as well as accountability from each responsible party. #Liberté #Transparence #Responsabilité (translated)

The French account Les Mileistes has estimated that, in a socialist country, individuals were encouraged to protest loudly and resort to vandalism, while capitalism rather encouraged them to provide good service, to be kind, and to maintain their reputation. It added that everyone reacted to the incentives presented to them and attributed the prevailing discontent in France to socialism, which would, according to him, push people to constantly complain. #Socialisme #Capitalisme #France (translated)

The French Mileists contested information that they claim was relayed by Le Canard enchaîné and several accounts on X, alleging that accounts linked to David Lisnard's campaign had bet on Polymarket to artificially inflate his chances. They stated that the bets against Lisnard were, on the contrary, very concentrated on a single account named LLamaLoco, which reportedly wagered more than 420,000 dollars against him. The largest bet in favor of Lisnard was said to be 18,000 dollars, which, according to them, represents a ratio of 25 to 1 in amount and 2.5 to 1 in the number of shares bought. They added that LLamaLoco also wagered 200,000 dollars against Marine Le Pen and 28,000 dollars on a victory for Jean-Luc Mélenchon, and that Lisnard and Le Pen represented 70% of the current positions of the account on Polymarket. The account allegedly continued to bet against Lisnard and had been active for some time. The French Mileists stated that they do not draw any conspiracy-like conclusions from these elements but believe that, without these bets, Lisnard would be even higher. Finally, they indicated that Polymarket, on its site reserved for American citizens, estimated his chances of winning at 16%. #Politique #DavidLisnard #Polymarket (translated)

The French Mileistes qualified the budget proposed the day before by the RN as a "gigantic joke" and believed it risked harming its economic credibility. They denounced the estimates, which they deemed rushed and unreliable, of political programs, adding that the projections for deficit reduction from Bercy were contradicted by reality each year. They described a political system where promises and assumptions would seldom be verified and where officials would not have to be held accountable in the event of lies. According to them, artificial intelligence would now allow for quick control of a program, with a first check in a few minutes and a thorough analysis in a few days, even though disagreements over the assumptions would persist. The French Mileistes called on other political leaders to learn from the RN's budget and to do better. #politique #budgets #responsabilité (translated)

The French Mileists indicated that David Lisnard was ahead of Jean-Luc Mélenchon on prediction sites, even though he was, according to them, ignored by most polling institutes. They suggested that the significant increase in memberships to New Energy could explain this trend, while also mentioning the possibility that the bettors might be wrong. #politique #France #élections (translated)

The account Les Mileistes Français noted that David Lisnard was too moderate for their taste and that they would undoubtedly support a more liberal candidate if one existed. However, they deemed that there would be no better option in 2027 and that Lisnard would have a chance, albeit a slim one, to win. The account added that the French were not ready to go further and that they believed Lisnard was sincere in his liberal commitment. According to them, the implementation of Lisnard's program could prevent a catastrophic bankruptcy and steer the country back in the right direction. The account mentioned that they were desperate a few months ago, but that Lisnard's candidacy now gave them a glimmer of hope, while specifying that they believed in it "a little." #Libéralisme #Politique #France (translated)

The French Mileistes estimated that France risked bankruptcy if David Lisnard did not win the 2027 election. The account described Édouard Philippe's economic program as a "joke" and claimed that markets would panic in the event of a victory for Marine Le Pen. It also dismissed Jean-Luc Mélenchon and judged that the other candidates had very little chance of being elected. According to the account, a state bankruptcy would lead to that of French banks, a partial loss of savings deposited in banks, the collapse of the real estate market, and a significant increase in unemployment. It described the scenario as a crisis of unimaginable violence for most French people and presented the choice in 2027 as being between David Lisnard and chaos. #France2027 #Économie #Politique (translated)