Search

Sofie Löwenmark wrote that she found a strong irony in that sexual offenders were placed together with the group they often had committed offenses against, in one of the few places where women should reasonably be protected from male perpetrators. https://t.co/uU2iOujyj7 #Jämställdhet #KvinnorsRättigheter #Rättvisa (translated)

Archbishop Martin Modéus believes that the state should apologize to the Sámi for historical abuses, which he describes as a matter of democratic maturity, and this coincides with a dialogue conference between the Church of Sweden and the Sámi community about reconciliation. #Samer #Ursäkt #Försoning (translated)

Agnes Hellström describes in her article how the boarding school fathers and the restored culture of silence at Sigtunaskolan represent frightening aspects of an institution marked by violence and limiting traditions, which continue to affect the students' lives and self-esteem. #Internatskola #Tystnadskultur #Övergrepp (translated)

Patrik Sjöberg wrote that Dumpen recently received a request to participate in Efterlyst Special. According to him, the program would be about vulnerable children and how adults could protect them, but the questions that were later sent via email instead focused on the perpetrators' privacy, Dumpen's methods of operation, and individuals that the organization had confronted who later committed suicide. Sjöberg also wrote that the questions raised how Dumpen could know that the confronted individuals were guilty and whether they could be innocent. (translated)

Sara Nilsson wrote that she had accepted to participate in Afterlyst special but made it clear to the editorial team that she did not want to discuss issues that Dumpen had raised since its inception over five years ago. She stated that she could consider participating if the conversation was about offenders and shortcomings in children's protection. Nilsson wrote that she had hoped the editorial team would pay attention to the influx of judgments in neighboring countries and compare them with Swedish legislation, which she believed was insufficient to prosecute individuals who actively tried to involve children in their sex lives. She also argued that individuals confronted by Dumpen had gone beyond merely viewing abusive material and were willing to risk a lot to gain access to children. Instead, the production, according to Nilsson, had developed questions about, among other things, the risk of exposing innocent people, men who had taken their own lives after confrontations, responsibility for relatives, the police's role, and her own defamation verdict. She perceived the layout as a crime special focusing on criticism of Dumpen. Nilsson wrote that she became very angry when a contact person at TV3 said that they privately thought Dumpen was doing a good job. She criticized people who, according to her, only expressed support for children's right to protection when no one else was listening, and called for adults to stand up for children openly. She stated that Dumpen had a support team with, among others, conversation therapists and psychiatrists, and asked what support Afterlyst offered. Nilsson claimed that individuals Afterlyst published information about were not more convicted than those published by Dumpen, and referred to the principle that a person should be considered innocent until a guilty verdict is announced. She asked whose right to protection was prioritized when the program created a special episode criticizing its own coverage. #Barnsäkerhet #Rättvisa #Skydd (translated)

The review echoed a testimony from a woman who, according to her account, had been raped while another attacker cut off her breasts with a knife. The assaults continued before she was killed, the review stated. The author described the massacre on October 7 as a deep trauma for Israeli society and wrote that this year's memorial ceremony was particularly significant because all surviving hostages had returned from Gaza and the remains of the murdered had been brought home. The review believed the day should have focused on the victims, the survivors, and the relatives. The review criticized Sveriges Radio for instead directing attention towards employee Sami Abu Salem in Gaza. The author also questioned why SVT Rapport, after a segment from the memorial ceremony in Tel Aviv, had presented Gilda Hamidi-Nia's documentary "The World's Most Hated?", which according to the review had been published three days before the anniversary and dealt with how Israeli soldiers were mapped on social media and accused of suspected war crimes in Gaza. The review stated that SVT's live broadcast from the ceremony repeatedly shifted the focus from the victims and their relatives to Israel's warfare, genocide allegations against Israel and the IDF, as well as the war in Gaza. The author argued that the coverage showed a lack of judgment, proportion, and respect, and asked why the victims were not allowed to be at the center of the memorial day. https://t.co/unFDFBluFH #Hamas #Israel #minnesdag (translated)

Filippa Kindblom writes about how a young female student at Cornell University, anonymously called Jane Doe, has accused several male students of gang rape, which has triggered a widespread movement at the university and on social media where many identify as Jane Doe in solidarity and criticism of how the schools handle sexual assault. #JaneDoe #metoo #CornellUniversity (translated)

The writer stated that the suspected group rape at the prestigious Cornell University in N.Y. had evoked very strong feelings and that the case was complicated in a way that, according to the writer, often occurred in similar events in Sweden. https://t.co/IY5mQ44d4b #Cornell #gruppvåldtäkt #övergrepp #US #SE (translated)

The number of countries that carry out executions in Southeast Asia is decreasing, while Singapore and Myanmar continue to increase their executions, according to a report from Amnesty International that highlights both progress and remaining serious abuses in the region. #Dödsstraff #MänskligaRättigheter #ASEAN (translated)

The review asked SVT journalists where the boundary between the Centre Party and the Green Party lay. The writer claimed that the Green Party was a particularly unsuitable partner if the Centre Party's main goals were the Swedish economy, growth, and entrepreneurship. According to the review, the Green Party combined the Left Party's anti-capitalism with a critique of civilization that viewed humanity's use of the earth as an intrusion. The review stated that the Green Party openly supported that view and wondered why the Centre Party nonetheless sought out the party to avoid collaborating with the Left Party. The writer questioned how the Centre Party reconciled its priorities with that choice. https://t.co/WCGhU4K3nM #politk #Sverige #journalistik (translated)