The author of the entry asked what image was being referred to and stated that a critical assessment of Karol Nawrocki's biography is not synonymous with insulting him. He wrote that Nawrocki made his own decisions and ran for the highest office in the state, so he should be prepared for public debate about his past. According to the author, an electoral victory does not exempt one from being assessed for behavior and credibility. The author asserted that a situation in which a person holding the highest office has a controversial past, and citizens were not informed of important circumstances before the elections, could be an affront to the Republic. He added that a person guided by honor should consider stepping down under such conditions, taking into account the seriousness and image of Poland, rather than their own ambitions. He also wrote that disclosed information about the past of a person representing the state could undermine their credibility in dealings with leaders of other countries and representatives of international institutions. Finally, he stated that the highest office should serve the state, not the protection of the reputation of the person holding it. #Polska #Polityka #Wybory (translated)



