Search

What I think. I believe it is necessary to make some clarifications regarding the many things that are being said these days about the actions of the technical consultant appointed by the then Public Prosecutor of Vigevano. When a public prosecutor entrusts an assessment to their own technical consultant and the assessment is carried out in the manner provided for in Article 360 of the Criminal Procedure Code - that is, involving the defenders of the accused and any appointed consultants - that consultant has a legal obligation to make available to the same Public Prosecutor, and obviously to the other parties, all the material related to their work. The obligation of the consultant to submit all documentation is accompanied by the prosecutor's duty to include everything in their file so that the parties can, if they wish, use that material in a future trial. In this case, the lack of knowledge of every operation related to the assignment has ultimately created a procedural flaw (or perhaps it would be better to define it as a “virus”) that has then spread in the subsequent phases of the proceeding. Just to give a concrete example, the experts that the Judge of the abbreviated trial had appointed for an ad hoc expertise on this aspect (DNA on the pedals) did not have knowledge of the negative replies. This process continued until we reached the latest ruling of the Supreme Court, which considered that it was undisputed that there was highly cellular genetic material belonging to the victim on the pedals of the "Umberto Dei" bicycle. By denying the judges of the merits (the GUP of Vigevano and the Courts of Assize of Appeal in Milan) knowledge of the objectively hidden elements (in the sense of "not present"), it ultimately undermined, in my humble opinion, the entire validation process of the evidence, rendering it in fact illegitimate. I am firmly convinced that the Public Prosecutor's Office of Pavia is necessarily committed to the faithful reconstruction of what happened and any related responsibilities. Last note. If at the time of the appeal presented by Stasi's defense to the European Court of Human Rights it had been possible to report this enormous violation of the right to defense that was unknown at the time, the outcome of the appeal would have been completely different. (translated)

#Garlasco #news I finally managed to hear all the recordings released today. "The castle" is exactly that. I have always said that 2017 was a consequence of 2007. The links were clear, especially on one side. Barbaini advises the Poggi family to ask Tizzoni to intervene against Napoleon, and she always asks Venditti to archive Sempio in 2017. Tizzoni tells us about his connections with Barbaini in his book, where he boasts about having managed to have Alberto Stasi convicted. Over the years, Tizzoni shows a strange involvement and attachment to the case, taking attitudes more typical of one side than their legal representative. Tizzoni, a lawyer with very high connections in politics and the judiciary, just to name a few: La Russa, Ligresti, and Berlusconi, takes on the case of a "very important" bicycle accident involving Chiara Poggi’s grandmother, the only (I assume) interlocutor, given the lack of relations between the grandmother and the mother. Let's return to the present, there's lawyer Lovati. The one of dreams, of the hitman. The one who has strange connections even with certain "YouTubers" (Dr. Stevens/Sindoca). The lawyer who accepts cash, "under the table", capable of obtaining a still-secret consultancy, the Linarello, strangely released from the Milan prosecutor's office of our first protagonist, Barbaini. Lovati, advised by Tizzoni, "friends" since their internship days, decides to give the mandate to Garofano, "head" of the Ris in 2007 who, along with Marino, plays with a boy's life. Attributing a trace of blood on the pedals that never existed. A "mistake", unfortunately still cannot be classified as a crime that will forever change Alberto Stasi's life, trapped for the interests of others. The point is, were the Ris hunting for successes after the blunders in Perugia and Cogne, or is there a complicit direction of a corrupt system? (translated)

No. There is nothing to discuss. There is nothing to ascertain. If there are two opposing scientific results, particularly one positive and two negative, that element cannot be used as evidence against the suspect or the accused. This is due to the principle that a conviction must be issued beyond a reasonable doubt, for the presumption of innocence, for the "favor rei." Because we live in a rule of law state. The DNA of Chiara Poggi on the pedals of Alberto Stasi's bicycle was one of the seven pieces of evidence that led to his conviction. Judicially and humanly. In the ruling of the Court of Appeal in 2014, it is clearly stated that according to the RIS interviewed during the first-degree trial in 2009, that DNA was significant, highly cellular, and compatible with blood substance. In fact, it was so significant that white blood cells could be seen with the naked eye. And that the tests conducted in 2009 yielded negative results regarding the blood presumably because two years had passed. All this was reported. But they forgot to mention that the day after the positive result, two additional tests (which were incomprehensible given the clear result of the first test) had yielded negative results. And when the experts appointed by the first-degree judge asked for all the laboratory results related to the pedals, they only provided the positive one. I want to believe that I live in a place where those who hold great responsibilities take on the consequences of their actions or omissions. I am not interested if, according to the law, the consequences will not be criminal because they have become statute-barred in their illegality. I care that those responsibilities be clarified and made known to everyone. To everyone. And I am sure that will happen. #garlasco (translated)

The evidence that could implicate #Sempio: there could have been blood on imprint 33. The palm print on the wall of the cellar, compatible in 15 points with Sempio's hand, linked to the trace of the bloodied shoe from Racis's work. In the words of the general's men, superficiality emerges: the data on the bicycle identical to that on the teaspoon and the two negative runs on the pedals that invalidate the DNA of the #Stasi verdict. @ilgiornale #Garlasco PS. See you later at #Ore14 (translated)

Influencers and various criminologists should carefully reread this part of the press release from the Public Prosecutor's Office of Pavia: A consultancy from the experts appointed by the defense of Alberto Stasi, Dr. Ugo Ricci and Pasquale Linarello, regarding the Raw Data delivered to the Public Prosecutor's Office of Pavia by the RIS of Parma on 11/06/2025 in the context of the current proceedings has been acquired. In the Raw Data, these consultants detected the presence of counter-analysis (two electrophoresis runs dated 09/20/2007) of the sample bu_p, the same sample that revealed the presence of the victim's DNA on the pedals of Umberto Dei's bike and led to Stasi's arrest, which were completely negative. According to the consultants, these counter-analyses were suitable to exonerate Alberto Stasi 19 years ago, but they do not exist in the file of the criminal proceedings 2025/2007 R.G.N.R. (Public Prosecutor's Office of Vigevano). In other words, the genetic profile determined just the day before (09/19/2007) from the only available extract obtained from the pedals of the bicycle (evidence bu_p) and attributed by the technical consultant of the P.M. of the time "beyond any reasonable doubt" to the victim, was found to be completely negative the following day (09/20/2007), when the same consultant had conducted new analyses. There is no trace of these two electrophoresis runs from 09/20/2007 and the related completely negative profiles in any document of the proceedings/trial held against Alberto Stasi. (translated)

L'avvocata di Alberto Stasi, Giada Bocellari, ha sostenuto che la mancanza di due controanalisi negative sul Dna dei pedali della bicicletta, emerse solo recentemente, avrebbe potuto cambiare l'esito del caso, in cui Stasi ha scontato undici anni di galera. #Giustizia #DNA #AlbertoStasi

#garlasco: secondo varie fonti, la persona che materialmente svolse il test relativo al DNA sui pedali della bicicletta è Giorgio Portera. L’uomo, oltre ad essere opinionista in TV, fu curiosamente anche il consulente dei #gambirasio nel processo a #massimobossetti. https://t.co/Hion5J31Wc #garlasco #giustizia #DNA

Fanno un esame sulla bicicletta, esce fuori che c’è il DNA di Chiara Poggi, il giorno dopo fanno un esame di conferma ed esce cosa? Galassi: “che è negativo, ma questo dato negativo, a quanto risulta da queste nuove comunicazioni della procura, non fu comunicato e quindi non entrò nella storia processuale, questo è un dato devastante.‼️ Stasi si trova di fronte un’opportunità maestosa di vedere revisionata la propria posizione”📍 #IgnotoX #garlasco #Giustizia #Garlasco #Processo

+++GARLASCO, SUI PEDALI DELLA BICICLETTA DI STASI NON C'ERA DNA DI CHIARA POGGI+++ La clamorosa rivelazione arriva dalla Procura di Pavia, che spiega: il contro-esame effettuato il giorno successivo (il 20.09.2007) aveva dato esito "totalmente negativo". Ma non fu segnalato #Garlasco #Giustizia #Cronaca

#garlasco #news Non è mai esistito DNA di Chiara Poggi sui pedali della bicicletta Umberto Dei di Alberto Stasi. Né sangue, né saliva, né quell’indefinito materiale “altamente cellulato” rimasto scolpito nelle sentenze di condanna. E gli ufficiali del RIS di Parma erano a conoscenza di questa circostanza: solo che le loro controanalisi sul reperto, entrambe negative, sono rimaste in un cassetto per 19 anni. Dal giorno successivo a quello in cui venne cristallizzato quel dato (2,78 nanogrammi per microlitro, una quantità insolitamente alta e una qualità insolitamente pura) alla pm di Vigevano Rosa Muscio, alla data in cui i retroscena di laboratorio sono diventati finalmente accessibili. #giustizia #inchiesta #verità

#garlasco Grazie a questa doppia Intervista #esclusiva, abbiamo scoperto come l'auto di Alberto #Stasi fu manipolata e contaminata, dal gruppo diretto da #Cassese il 13 Agosto 2007, come la sua bicicletta venne spostata dai #Carabinieri senza guanti, alternandone lo stato, e come i reperti sequestrati dalla sua abitazione vennero portati dagli inquirenti dentro due sacchi neri dell'immondizia. E non mancheranno le sorprese dai retroscena mai raccontati, nel mentre i Carabinieri e i RIS lavoravano sulla scena del crimine. Grazie all'Avv. Piercarlo Collivignarelli, ex assessore e responsabile della sicurezza per il comune di Garlasco, che ha assistito a tutte le fasi immediatamente dopo il ritrovamento del corpo di Chiara #Poggi, abbiamo finalmente un quadro completo di come Alberto Stasi non ebbe mai un'indagine corretta a suo carico e di conseguenza un giusto processo. Inoltre, sapremo direttamente da Alessia Villani, ex amica e compagna di classe delle #gemelle #Cappa, sin da bambine, i retroscena e cosa venne fuori dalle conversazioni mai registrate sulle intercettazioni. E la lista delle sorprese non si limita a questo. https://t.co/RnEN2cVBQg #Garlasco #Giustizia #Crimine

Circa trecento persone hanno partecipato a Torino alla manifestazione 'Basta morire di strada' per commemorare Nicolò, un bambino di sette anni investito mentre andava a scuola in bicicletta, chiedendo maggior sicurezza stradale e politiche innovative per la mobilità. #BastaMorireDiStrada #SicurezzaStradale #MobilitàSostenibile