Search

Tiago Barbosa stated that Globo would have negotiated with Flávio Bolsonaro the return of bets and the 6x1 schedule. He accused the broadcaster of prioritizing profit from families' addiction and the exploitation of workers, and said that Lula would be the only antidote to this scenario. #Brasil #Lula #Mídia (translated)

The article criticizes the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Navi Pillay, highlighting her controversial trajectory as a human rights defender and her criticized positions regarding Israel, suggesting that the Nobel Committee promotes a distorted and hypocritical view of reality. #NobelDaPaz #DireitosHumanos #Antissionismo (translated)

The Football Planet reported, citing Gustavo Tutinha, that Vasco and the new investor Almirante should expand the dispute for the Maracanã. According to the publication, they would challenge the bidding and management of the Fla-Flu Consortium and seek to investigate possible irregularities and alleged breaches of the public notice, involving the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Attorney General's Office, and the Government. The publication added that the dispute could go beyond the match against Boca Juniors and reach the conditions of the concession. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha stated that Vasco and a new investor should expand the competition for Maracanã after the Deliberative Council approved Admiral's proposal. According to him, President Pedrinho had signaled this intention on the day of the approval. Tutinha said that questions about possible irregularities and alleged violations of the bidding document, as well as the involvement of the Public Ministry, the Attorney General's Office, and the State Government, had put the concession under greater scrutiny. He predicted that the bidding process, the obligations of the bidding document, and the decisions of the Fla-Flu Consortium would be closely monitored. The author attributed the change in scenario to the posture he characterized as arrogant from BAP and Frederico Nantes. He also stated that the competition for the use of the stadium could turn into a broader debate about the concession and management of Maracanã, which he described as a public asset, not property of the consortium. Tutinha said that the confrontation that began around a semifinal could be the start of a larger dispute. #Maracanã #Vasco #Licitação (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha argued that Vasco should terminate its contract with Greenleaf. He claimed that the company had produced controversial reports and opinions in the legal dispute over Maracanã, used against the club's interests. Tutinha also requested that the MPRJ, PGE, and control bodies investigate the stadium's concession contract and compliance with the notice, especially in the application of technical and equitable criteria. According to him, the concessionaire managed a public asset and should be accountable for its decisions. Finally, he requested an investigation into the actions of the vice-president of TJRJ, Suely Lopes Magalhães, including the circumstances and competence of her decision, the compliance with the rules of the judicial planton, and the contradictions that, according to him, were pointed out in the decision that subsequently reconsidered its effects. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

Rick Azevedo wrote that the end of the 6×1 shift was not a concession from politicians, but a victory of the working class, which, according to him, was tired of having to ask for permission to live. He also advocated for the struggle to continue. #Trabalho #DireitosTrabalhadores #LutaSindical (translated)

Geraldo Alckmin stated that President Lula's government made possible, through the concession of the Dutra, the Passarelão da Fé, a 134 km route between Arujá and Aparecida, with a sidewalk and bike lane for pilgrims to follow to the sanctuary. He also said that two more lanes will be built on the highway between São José dos Campos and Aparecida to provide more fluidity to the travels. #Fé #Peregrinação #Infraestrutura (translated)

Attention, fans of Vasco! It was reported that Vasco da Gama presented a 32-page manifestation to the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro and asked the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto to reconsider the ruling that suspended the authorization to use Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20. According to the publication, the club pointed out the extension, by CONMEBOL, until October 13, at noon, of the deadline to confirm the stadium. It also questioned the writ of security from the conceding company Fla-Flu, invoked the priority of official football games provided for in the concession agreement, and cited assessments from the Military Police and statements from the Public Ministry regarding security and logistics. Vasco acknowledged that Estádio Nilton Santos could host the match but argued that this did not justify preventing the use of Maracanã. The publication added that the club requested the restoration of the decision by judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from October 9, which had authorized the game in Maracanã, and contested the adequacy of the writ of security from the conceding company. The request still depended on a new court decision, the profile reported. #Vasco #CopaSulAmericana #Maracanã (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that the Fla-Flu Consortium appealed to the president of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro to try to reverse the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the profile, the consortium filed a writ of security and requested an urgent measure while the appeal was being analyzed. The consortium stated it had authorized six requests from Vasco since the start of the concession, including classics against Flamengo and Fluminense. The authorization for the match with Boca Juniors would remain valid, unless the court accepted the request, the profile added, citing O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Futebol (translated)

Today in the Military World shared a post attributed to the Chancellor of Poland, stating that the United States' decision to allow Russia to supply diesel to global markets, including the American one, would help the Kremlin hinder efforts to end the war. The Chancellor stated that the revenues from exports would allow Russia to continue financing the war in Ukraine and classified the authorization as a unilateral concession by the U.S. in the negotiations, with no Russian counterpart. #Polônia #Rússia #Ucrânia (translated)

Poponze wrote that the legal group Prerrogativas stated that Vorcaro would have received a promise of house arrest after the elections in exchange for a false testimony against Lula. According to the entity, the proposal would also include the immediate release of his father, Henrique Vorcaro. https://t.co/7q4gkqN5vK #Lula #Justiça #Política (translated)

The Cruzmaltina Arena informed that the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro communicated to the State Government that it had requested the Maracanã Consortium to make the stadium available for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana between Vasco and Boca Juniors. According to the publication, the MP also pointed out a possible breach of the concession contract by Flamengo and Fluminense. The contact with the government is said to have occurred on that day. The information was attributed to Diogo Dantas, and the photo to Daniel Ramalho. #CopaSulamericana #Maracanã #Vasco (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Vasco filed an appeal on Friday (02) at the TJRJ against the decision of the 2nd Civil Court that did not analyze its urgent request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors and suspended the process for 20 days, after a statement from Fla-Flu Serviços in 48 hours. According to Tutinha, Vasco argued that it needs to indicate the stadium to CONMEBOL by 10/05 for the match on 10/20 at 21:30, and that the suspension could make a subsequent decision pointless. The club requested that Judge Rose Marie Pimentel Martins, from the 5th Chamber of Public Law, grant the request directly for Maracanã to be made available. As an alternative, it requested the end of the suspension and that the first-instance judge analyze the preliminary injunction without waiting for the appeal related to the popular action. Tutinha reported that Vasco also contested the technical criteria used to deny the stadium and claimed a contradiction in the concessionaire's position on the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Vasco, Flamengo, and Fluminense. The club stated that the restrictions should be applied in a non-discriminatory manner and cited ten official matches held at Maracanã in May 2026, nine of them between the 9th and 30th, including games on consecutive days: Fluminense x Bolívar on 05/19, and Flamengo x Estudiantes on 05/20; Flamengo x Cusco on 05/26, and Fluminense x Deportivo La Guaira on 05/27. According to Tutinha, Vasco also mentioned the indication of Maracanã by PMERJ as the most suitable option for security planning. Among the requests, it included non-discriminatory commercial and operational conditions, a maximum ticket load according to the authorized capacity, and a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Antonio Tabet wrote that he did not understand the exasperated reaction of Bolsonaro supporters and questioned what was lacking in the debate the day before. He stated that they used to say they did not watch Globo and recalled that Jair wanted to revoke the network's concession. https://t.co/D1AFoMN3SQ #Bolsonarismo #Debate #Política (translated)

Aldo stated that, in the 2026 elections, Globo would support a candidate whose father, according to him, was imprisoned for attempting a coup. He also accused the network of trying to undermine Supreme Court ministers who, in his view, defended democracy by fulfilling their constitutional duty. He said that Globo, owned by the Marinho family, was repeating the stance it took in 1964 when it called the dictatorship a democracy and spent four years trying to destabilize a democratically elected government. Aldo also accused the network of omitting repeated threats from the United States, which he attributed to a conspiracy with the Bolsonaro family. Aldo argued that Globo should cease to be a public concession, claiming it served private interests. He also stated that the network had not learned from the 21 years of the coup it supported and that it was later silenced and censored. He criticized what he called Globo's insistence on harming the country to perpetuate neoliberal interests. #GLOBO #Democracia #Eleições2026 (translated)

🚨 VASCO CONTESTS TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF FLA-FLU, POINTS OUT VIOLATION OF CONCESSION RULES AND CITES DECISION FROM TJRJ IN ACTION FOR MARACANÃ Vasco filed an obligation lawsuit on Wednesday (1st) with a request for urgent protective measures to try to secure the Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. In the action, the club directly questions the technical criteria used by Fla-Flu to deny the stadium, points out unequal treatment, supports violations of concession rules, and also explores a contradiction involving the Memorandum of Understanding. 📌 WHAT FLA-FLU ALLEGED In response to Vasco, the concessionaire pointed to the accumulated wear of the lawn, the climatic conditions of July and August, and the need to preserve the intervals designated for field maintenance. For 10/20, Fla-Flu specifically mentioned games of Fluminense on 10/18 and Flamengo on 10/22. With Vasco x Boca between these matches, there would be three games in five days. According to the concessionaire, this sequence would prevent procedures such as helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and repair of damage to the lawn. 📌 VASCO QUESTIONS THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION The first counterpoint is the lawn itself. Vasco highlights that, three days after the denial, it was announced that the existing field would be removed and new Bermuda Celebration rolls would be placed, with the return of football scheduled for 10/08. Vasco x Boca will be on 10/20. The club's thesis is that it would not be possible to use the accumulated wear of the old lawn as justification for a match that will take place 12 days after the return of football to the renewed field. 📌 GREENLEAF DOCUMENT IS USED BY VASCO Vasco also retrieves the technical planning prepared by Greenleaf, the company responsible for lawn maintenance, in August. According to the action, the document shows that the same procedures cited by Fla-Flu to deny Vasco x Boca have already been carried out in a concentrated manner between matches. The petition states that helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and damage repair have even been grouped in a single day after a match, even in a winter scenario and lawn wear. The question posed by Vasco is direct: if this work could be done in August to accommodate the sequence of games from Flamengo and Fluminense, why couldn't it be repeated in October, after the complete lawn replacement? 📌 INTERVAL BETWEEN GAMES Vasco also contests the argument of three games in five days by comparing the situation with the recent calendar of the Maracanã. The action argues that sequences with reduced intervals for Flamengo and Fluminense matches have already been admitted. For Vasco, if the necessary interval for lawn recovery is decisive for denying a match, that criterion must be applied equally to all clubs. 📌 SHOWS AND OTHER EVENTS The action also points out that the Maracanã hosts shows, religious gatherings, and events from other sports, including the installation of structures and occupancy of the field area. Vasco questions how the administration can reconcile these events with lawn preservation, yet considers it technically unfeasible to host a semifinal of CONMEBOL. According to the data presented in the action, at least seven extraordinary events unrelated to official football were held between 2025 and 09/30/2026. 📌 CONCESSION NOTICE Vasco cites item 3.4 of the Terms of Reference, which gives priority to football events from the official calendars of FIFA, CONMEBOL, CBF, and FERJ over other events. Vasco x Boca is an official semifinal of CONMEBOL. The action argues that there would be an "inversion of this priority" by accommodating shows and other events and denying the stadium for a match that, under the concession rules cited by the club, should have priority. The petition mentions "distortion of the concessionaire's obligations" and "violation of the equal treatment required by the Concession Notice." 📌 UNEQUAL TREATMENT Vasco summarizes its challenge in four points: • the lawn replacement would change the premise of accumulated wear; • Greenleaf's own planning would demonstrate that maintenance could be carried out between matches; • the calendar would show reduced intervals that have already been admitted for Flamengo and Fluminense; • other events are reconciled with the necessary care for field preservation. As a result, Vasco asserts that restrictions are being applied selectively. The action further cites clause 13.2 of the Concession Contract, which prohibits favoritism and unjustifiably different, discriminatory treatment, or "without technical criteria" that results in restricted access to the Complex. 📌 THE CONTRADICTION POINTED OUT BY VASCO Fla-Flu claims not to recognize the validity of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025. At the same time, according to Vasco, it uses the document itself—especially the provision for four matches conditioned on availability and operational conditions—to justify the denial. Vasco points out contradictory behavior and invokes the principle of good faith. 📌 PREVIOUS DECISION OF TJRJ The action also cites the Instrument Appeal No. 3023517-70.2026.8.19.0000. On that occasion, Justice Alexandre Freitas Câmara analyzed the discussion regarding the absence of Fla-Flu's signature on the Memorandum. The magistrate stated that Flamengo and Fluminense, members of the concessionaire, had signed the document and pointed out that disregarding it later could represent contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. 📌 RECOMMENDATION FROM BEPE The issue of public safety also appears as an argument for the use of the Maracanã. According to the action, BEPE (Specialized Battalion for Policing in Stadiums) recommended holding the match at the Maracanã due to the magnitude of the confrontation and the expected public turnout. Vasco uses this recommendation to argue that the Maracanã is not just a preference of the club. The petition points to the stadium as the option that best meets capacity, location, structure, security, and operational conditions to host the match against Boca. 📌 SÃO JANUÁRIO IS NOT AN OPTION Vasco also differentiates the situation from the previous process involving Vasco x Vitória, when it did not obtain a preliminary injunction to use the Maracanã. This time, according to the action, São Januário cannot host the semifinal. The South American Manual requires a minimum capacity of 30,000 spectators starting from the semifinals, while the petition indicates São Januário has approximately 21,880 seats. Vasco acknowledges the Nilton Santos Stadium as an alternative but argues that having another stadium does not resolve the issue brought to Justice: is there legitimate technical and contractual basis for Fla-Flu to deny Maracanã? 📌 WHAT VASCO SEEKS Vasco is seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Fla-Flu to make the Maracanã available for Vasco x Boca on 10/20 at 9:30 PM. The request includes the maximum ticket allocation corresponding to the authorized capacity, the use of necessary facilities for organizing the match, the implementation of a mosaic, and temporary installation of banners in the same manner allowed for the clubs that are members of the concessionaire. In case of non-compliance, Vasco requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million. Vasco must inform CONMEBOL by October 5 where it will hold the return match of the semifinal. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Victory! CT Rei Pelé stays with the club after Santos FC and União reach an agreement. After nearly a decade of problems, worsened by the threat of having the CT Rei Pelé land auctioned off, the board of Santos FC reached an agreement with União to establish a new concession period for the area. After long and extensive negotiations, Peixe will remain with the right to use the property for another 20 years – extendable for another 20! The onerous concession agreement was signed on Thursday morning at the Palácio do Planalto, with the presence of the President of the Republic, Lula, the President of Santos FC, Marcelo Teixeira, and the eternal idols Clodoaldo, Serginho Chulapa, Pepe. "Undoubtedly, this was one of the greatest victories we've had in recent years. Only those who followed closely know the difficulties we faced to keep our training center," says President Marcelo Teixeira. #SantosFC #CTReiPelé #FutebolBrasileiro (translated)

The Santista nation has gained a reason more than special to celebrate. The board of Santos Football Club, after lengthy and complex negotiations, reached an agreement with the Union to establish a new concession period for the area of CT Rei Pelé! For another 20 years – extendable for another 20 – Peixão will continue to have the right to use the property. #SantosFC #Futebol #CTReiPelé (translated)