Search

How digital simulation lowers heat losses and cuts carbon emissions 🖥️ Rather than building new physical infrastructure, district heating operator SEI digitally forecasts optimal charging cycles in real time. Read more about Energy Efficiency Action: https://t.co/Au2879M9rZ #DigitalSimulation #EnergyEfficiency #CarbonEmissions #Nospecificcountriesmentioned.

🔴 @LFLOfficiel 2026 Summer - Lower Bracket Final LA FINALE EST À UN BO5 !! Dernier obstacle avant le match ultime. Ce soir, on se bat pour y accéder et pouvoir aller chercher le titre !! #KCORP 🆚 @TLN_PIRATES 🕕 18h00 📺 https://t.co/uyo0KItlpg https://t.co/bpHY2S9lCd #Eスポーツ #KCORP #Finale

Anmäler misstänkt valfusk. Endast Socialdemokraternas namnvalsedlar fanns tillgängliga vid förtidsröstning i Skellefteå. – Vi har kunnat identifierat två valställen – ett campus och ett äldreboende, säger oppositionsrådet Andreas Löwenhöök (M) till Riks. https://t.co/6ArMQ4y9IT #valfusk #skellefteå #demokrati

Hvor højt tror du staten er parat til at lade topskatten stige til? The Kennedy Tax Cuts of 1963–1964 In early 1963, the top marginal individual income tax rate in the United States stood at an extraordinary 91 percent—a legacy of the exceptionally high tax rates established during and after World War II. President John F. Kennedy proposed a sweeping tax overhaul, arguing that excessively high marginal rates were holding back private investment, risk-taking, employment, and economic growth. His original proposal would have reduced individual income tax rates across the board, lowering them from a range of 20–91 percent to 14–65 percent. It also called for reductions in corporate tax rates and stronger incentives for investment. Kennedy’s administration explicitly argued that lower tax rates would stimulate private economic activity, increase investment, and expand production and employment. The goal was not simply to reduce taxes, but to remove what Kennedy called the “heavy drag” that the existing tax system placed on private initiative. (Fraser) The proposal faced substantial opposition in Congress, particularly because of concerns about its fiscal implications and accompanying tax reforms. Nevertheless, the business community and many economic organizations strongly supported the central idea of substantial rate reductions. (Fraser) Kennedy did not live to see his proposal enacted. After his assassination in November 1963, President Lyndon B. Johnson made passage of the legislation a priority. The final measure, the Revenue Act of 1964, reduced the top marginal tax rate from 91 percent to 70 percent and substantially lowered individual and corporate tax rates. (Fraser) The economy subsequently entered a powerful and sustained expansion. Contemporary economic analyses attributed a significant portion of the improvement in production, employment, investment, and tax revenues to the cuts, although monetary policy and other factors also contributed. (Judiciary Committee)

Anmäler misstänkt valfusk. Endast Socialdemokraternas namnvalsedlar fanns tillgängliga vid förtidsröstning i Skellefteå. – Vi har kunnat identifierat två valställen – ett campus och ett äldreboende, säger oppositionsrådet Andreas Löwenhöök (S) till Riks. https://t.co/vgT1pwwuHZ #valfusk #politikk #Sverige

Hoy no se nos dió, caemos ante @TeamVitalityCS en el Lower Bracket del Grupo B Con este resultado se termina nuestro recorrido por la @BLASTPremier Open Porto 2026. Gracias a todos a los que se pasaron a bancar al equipo #TodoVioleta💜 https://t.co/ZaFenOmuAT #BLASTPremier #TeamVitality #Esports

Daycare Governance and the Tyranny of Compassion Something sinister can hide behind compassion. Caring is virtuous, but it becomes pathological when institutions gain power by expanding the number of people who need care. Munchausen syndrome by proxy shows how: a caregiver fabricates or induces illness in a dependent person, then gains sympathy by performing devotion. The sickness is manufactured, but the care is real. The claim: modern society can scale this into governance. Call it the daycare governance model: (1) victims to protect, (2) caregivers to provide protection, (3) dissenters to remove. Health, therapy, NGOs, academia, media, and bureaucracy gain prestige, funding, and moral authority by managing ever-expanding categories of suffering. It unfolds in two stages. First, the victim class expands: “trauma” drifts from specific, severe harms to everyday experiences, lowering the threshold for suffering until demand is nearly limitless. Second, the perpetual patient forms: ordinary difficulties are medicalized—strength as toxicity, sadness as disorder, restlessness as pathology—creating a cycle where caretakers and victims gain status or protection. This drives a crisis of competence. Victimhood can shield accountability, and institutions are rewarded for treating problems rather than eliminating the need for themselves. Plato warned against doing for people what they can do for themselves: removing every burden removes the reason to grow stronger. True care aims to make itself unnecessary. That’s the difference between a good mother and a poisoning one: one allows appropriate hardship to build independence; the other denies it. Failing to distinguish these forms of care makes the pathology hard to recognize—and easy to applaud.

Why Therapy Culture Is Making Us Weak Why, despite unprecedented mental-health awareness and therapy language, does mental health seem to worsen? If both “the cure” and “the disease” expand together, we should ask what culture produces them. Modern therapy culture often teaches us to prioritize feelings, explain flaws through trauma, and treat negative emotions as reactions to others. Carl Jung proposed a different order: consciousness—judgment, values, and will—should govern the unconscious, including instincts and emotions. Health means understanding these forces without letting them rule. Today that hierarchy is frequently reversed: emotion outranks reason, and “lived experience” can outrank evidence. Jung warned this resembles “psychological Bolshevism,” where lower impulses overthrow higher faculties in the name of freedom. Nietzsche cautioned that “for every drive wants to be master.” The key question isn’t only where feelings come from, but whether we govern them. Therapy culture can also weaken self-criticism, treating conscience, guilt, and shame as oppressive rather than corrective. With “concept creep” (trauma/harm expanding to cover normal discomfort), personal agency can shrink: if everything is done to us, responsibility becomes harder to exercise. This can spread socially: victim identities bond through grievance, replacing judgment with collective resentment. History shows where that leads. The defense is older than therapy: govern yourself before demanding the world be changed.

Mass Migration as a Path to Expanding State Power Western governments have incentives for mass migration. Increasingly staffed by progressives, the state wants to expand its authority over social relations and the economy. Wealth redistribution and equitable representation are easier to claim once the state controls the levers. Many see rising living costs as a failure; for those harmed, it makes sense. From the state’s perspective, however, faster arrivals than can be housed, schooled, or treated strain the system. The state then responds with more spending in those areas, exerting economic control. A state failure becomes the pretext for expanding the state. Higher population also enables misleading “per-capita” narratives. If five people live together making $50,000 each, GDP is $250,000. Add five more and cut everyone to $45,000: GDP becomes $450,000—nearly double—despite lower individual income. Competition for rooms, food, and yard space raises prices while people earn less, producing fewer earnings and higher costs. Rob Henderson calls these “luxury consequences.” Mark Wiseman, co-founder of the Century Initiative, backed a goal of 100 million people in Canada by 2100 (~800,000 per year). What happened in 2022–2024 exceeded targets. After disaster, Wiseman “failed upwards,” later joining Prime Minister Mark Carney’s advisory council. If the state directs social and economic life, it must also prevent revolts when planning fails. Fragmenting society into factions and encouraging their differences weakens cooperation—divide and conquer. The state’s interest was never a thriving citizenry, only a growing one.

The CDC (and the CDC Foundation) ran multiple campaigns encouraging COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, with a particular focus on Black and Hispanic women because uptake was consistently lower in those groups. Two of the most relevant efforts were: Pregnant & Protected** #COVID19 #Vaccination #Pregnancy #US

Why should anyone be allowed to be legally paid less than the minimum wage? The minimum wage as it is is already below a living wage. This government is allowing business to lower standards and wages for everyone. #EndSubMinWage https://t.co/EdlHWK85EY #MinimumWage #LivingWage #FairPay #Nospecificcountrycodesarementionedinthetweet.

Achtung: Der Bitcoin Pullback wird kommen und darüber entscheiden, ob es nur eine Bärenmarkt-Rallye ist oder der Anfang des neuen Bullenmarkts. Schaut euch die Bestätigung vom letzten Zyklus an. Erst wurde die Cost Basis (rote Linie) der kurzfristigen Investoren überboten und dann nochmal erfolgreich geretestet. Danach ging der Bullenmarkt richtig los. In Bärenmärkten gibt es solche Versuche allerdings oft. Zuletzt haben wir es im Mai erlebt und der Retest wurde abgelehnt, wonach es nochmal tiefer ging. Aktuell liegt die STH Cost Basis bei $67.700. Eine Korrektur dorthin wäre denkbar und sogar gesund, sofern diese Marke dann hält und im Anschluss neue Hochs gemacht werden. Hierfür brauchen wir stetige Spot-Nachfrage und müssen daher in lower Timeframes auf die Orderflow Daten blicken. Was meint ihr? #Bitcoin #Kryptowährungen #Bullenmarkt