Lito Sousa has left us. The sadness is immense. It was years and years watching Lito's channel, learning almost daily about the history of aviation and this incredible universe of airplanes. Lito was very important; he really made a difference. Much more than the videos and his career as a mechanic. There were countless projects, him and his wife Mila, many of which are still active today with hundreds of people working. He was THE GUY. You will be missed a lot, Lito. Thank you for everything. Thank you very much. Much strength to Mila, to his son Malone, and to all family and friends. (translated)
I received the news of Lito Sousa's passing with great sadness. Lito transformed his passion for aviation into knowledge shared with millions of Brazilians, always with simplicity, good humor, and generosity. My affection and solidarity to the family, friends, and everyone who followed his journey. (translated)
You mentioned that @SuomenPoliisi prohibited you from discussing matters related to the investigation. Did the police explain what this prohibition is based on? According to Section 5 of Chapter 11 of the Preliminary Investigation Act, a prohibition must be given in writing and formally communicated. It must specify the subject of the prohibition, the duration of the prohibition, and the potential penalties. The prohibition can only relate to matters that have come to light in the investigation, which do not concern the prohibited person themselves and which they did not previously know. Moreover, their disclosure must additionally be able to complicate the investigation or cause harm or disadvantage to someone. What was such a matter in this case? The investigation concerns a message that has already been published. The suspect's own suspicion of a crime, their own message, and what the police have reported regarding their status concern the suspect themselves. The prohibition does not extend to them, nor does Paragraph 2 of Section 23 of the Publicity Act, which only pertains to confidential information regarding other individuals obtained as parties involved. The police must also clarify the content of the confidentiality obligation (ETL 11:6). Was that done? If the police prohibited the recording of the interrogation or the publication of its content, what is the legal basis for the restriction, and what information does it pertain to? If the suspect cannot record, will the police record it themselves? The interrogation must be recorded when the method of its conduct should be able to be verified later (ETL 9:3). In this matter, the basis is evident. The suspect has the right to remain silent. You can refuse to answer until the binding nature, basis, and scope of the prohibition have been clarified (and, of course, otherwise as well). You do not have to guess the limits of an ambiguous prohibition. The police do not need to allow the publication of all material in advance. But if an authority claims that revealing information is punishable, the basis and subject of the prohibition must be specified. If it was a request, it should not be presented as an obligation, and such a request can always be met with a mocking belly laugh. (translated)
“To Captain Smit Machchhar — thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for your courage, determination, and the actions that saved many lives. I wish you a full recovery and much health. The State of Israel expresses its immense gratitude to you.” “Yaniv Hayoun, Tzvika Mans, Asaf Rajuan, and Dr. Shota Musayev” will be honored for their “extraordinary courage in an impossible situation,” Isaac Herzog said in a statement. (translated)
A flash flood in Nepal in recent days resulted in at least 30 deaths, left tourists trapped, and affected more than 1,900 families, with many now homeless after landslides and heavy rains. (translated)
Well, I always say that no one has internal tracking, right? Research rarely gets out, especially internal party research. But I was given an internal poll showing Lula already with 48% of the vote intentions. So, yes, there is a chance we can win in the first round. Let’s push hard! In fact, I made a promise to myself because I need this: if Lula wins in the first round, next week I will take a sabbatical week. On Tuesday I will go to the beach and stay there, if God willing, without picking up my phone because we would have saved the democracy of the country once again. That's it, folks. Let's go for Lula in the first round. We have good internal polls and, for my peace, tranquility, and rest, at least for a few days, let's resolve this in the first round! 🥹 (translated)
I am seeing a lot of people say that Missão will appeal to another minister to participate in the Debate. Does anyone know which law will be used? Because from what I studied, he can request reconsideration from Carmem herself or request to go to the plenary, which would only give time. He could also try to appeal to the presidency of the 1st panel, but Carmem is the president. I know that in Brazil everything is chaotic, but I wanted to understand this maneuver… (translated)
Afternoon of a lot of conversation at the Method, with @pablomarcal1 and with people who open the store early, pay salaries at the end of the month, and don’t give up when things get tough. We talked about work, opportunity, and a Brazil where those who want to grow don’t have to ask for permission to do so. There are only a few days left. The way is with @flaviobolsonaro! Brazilians deserve to dream again. 2️⃣2️⃣ (translated)
🚨 ATTENTION! Today is one of the most important days in this final stretch of the campaign. We need to dominate the networks! Tags of the day: BRAZIL WITH LULA ON FLOW TURN OFF GLOBO DO NOT WATCH THE DEBATE NEVER AGAIN A COUP At the same time as the debate on Globo, Lula will be on Flow. Let's concentrate our strength there: cuts, comments, cards, and a lot of promotion to bring the maximum audience to the program. Unfortunately, the broadcaster has been partial, harming Lula and favoring Flávio Bolsonaro. That's why we will boycott the debate. Do not watch and do not share anything. The mobilization is for democracy and against the coup. We need to make it clear why we are boycotting, which is the broadcaster's stance in supporting a coup supporter, sellout, and one of the biggest corrupts in the country. Let’s go for it! Now is the time for the truth! BRAZIL WITH LULA ON FLOW TURN OFF GLOBO DO NOT WATCH THE DEBATE NEVER AGAIN A COUP (translated)