Search

Krzysztof Sałek from KO in Stalowa Wola referenced a statement by Lech Kaczyński about delay despite a clear obligation and the necessity to act according to the Constitution. He claimed that Nawrocki violated the Constitution because inaction also means refusal. He also wrote that the current government wanted to carry out a constitutional reset, but Duda vetoed it, and the recipients of his post voted against it. He accused them of lying. https://t.co/fNpi4xOmEb #Konstytucja #Polska #Kaczyński (translated)

Tomasz Lipiński presented a humorous dialogue in which, following the news of a drone that crashed at night near Lublin, instead of pointing to the Russians, Nawrocki was indicated. He then admitted that it was a joke and wrote that he wanted to please the prime minister, as he knew that he would like to hear such a response. #Polska #Lublin #dron (translated)

Scaloppine wrote that Supreme Court judge Andrzej Michałowicz had over 4 per mil of alcohol and was causing a commotion on the train. He presented him as a protégé of Zbigniew Ziobro and the president of the District Court in Słupsk, appointed in July by Karol Nawrocki to the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court despite numerous objections. He added that Michałowicz was appointed by the "illegal KRS." The author described this situation as a reflection of the decline of Polish judiciary and accused Nawrocki and his associates of not commenting on or condemning the matter. He also wrote that later Szefernaker spoke of his boss as a defender of the rule of law and the Constitution, to which Scaloppine denied, claiming that Nawrocki protected a drunken troublemaker. https://t.co/6BgbKbMzPW #praworządność #Polska #sądownictwo (translated)

MamPytanie wrote that President Nawrocki declared that he does not recognize Maciej Berek as a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal. In response, she declared that she does not recognize Nawrocki as president, stating that both declarations have the same legal force. #polityka #sędziowie #TrybunałKonstytucyjny (translated)

The author of the entry assessed that Nawrocki was not a "guardian of the Constitution" and accused him of attempting to ascribe to himself competencies that, according to the author, the fundamental law did not grant him. He wrote that merely invoking the Constitution during conferences and political disputes did not mean defending it, and it should also be respected when its provisions were politically inconvenient. He added that Nawrocki was not a ruler, and the Constitution should not be treated as a private regulation of his power. He concluded his assessment with a critical comment. #Konstytucja #Prawo #Polityka (translated)

The author accused Bogucki of incorrectly asserting that in Poland no one can become a judge without taking an oath before the president. He wrote that he did not know whether it was Bogucki's interpretation or that of Karol Nawrocki, and he cited Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution. According to the author, judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are chosen by the Sejm, and the president does not have constitutional powers to appoint or approve them. The author emphasized that the obligation to take an oath before the president arises from the law, not from the Constitution. He claimed that the president merely receives the oath, and the oath itself does not create the judge's mandate. He also referenced the Constitutional Tribunal's ruling in case K 34/15, which — as he wrote — clarified that the taking of the oath does not imply the president's involvement in shaping the Tribunal's composition. Finally, he criticized Bogucki for, in his opinion, presenting the Constitution according to the political needs of the President's Chancellery. #Konstytucja #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polska (translated)

Krzysztof Sałek from KO Stalowa Wola criticized the Republic, a person associated with it, as well as politicians from PiS and the Nawrocki Chancellery, using offensive terms against them. He wrote that in his opinion they should not be in power, and accused them of waiting for the opportunity to transform Poland into Belarus. https://t.co/vYSQOgTmHA #Polska #Polityka #Demokracja (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that President Karol Nawrocki considered taking an oath before the president a necessary condition for assuming the office of a judge of a common court or the Constitutional Tribunal. According to Bogucki, Nawrocki emphasized that this obligation pertains to the office of the president, not a specific person. Bogucki also conveyed that Nawrocki assessed that individuals taking an oath before the Speaker of the Sejm undermine their qualifications to sit on the Constitutional Tribunal by demonstrating a lack of basic knowledge. He added that the president stated that the Speaker of the Sejm does not have the authority to swear in judges. #Polska #Konstytucja #sędziowie (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the revealed recordings raised questions about the reason for the police check on the man who was, as he suggested, connected to the protest. According to his reconstruction, the officers followed the man for several dozen meters, demanded his personal information without providing a specific reason for the check, and then incapacitated him inside the building. Kusznieruk noted that the man pushed the officers away and fled inside, but he believed that this did not explain the earlier decision to conduct a check. The author claimed that the man lost consciousness during the intervention, and the knife found with him was not presented as having been used. He also questioned the proportionality of the force used and whether the man deliberately attacked the policewoman when the window broke. Furthermore, he described that several hours later, the detained man was informed that he could meet with lawyer Magdalena Leszczyńska if he provided his details. According to Kusznieruk, the man did not know the lawyer and did not want to see her, while the police considered this a refusal to contact a defense attorney. Kusznieruk also criticized the statement by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who — as he wrote — linked the matter to President Nawrocki. He asked whether the police acted on the orders of superiors, collected data on demonstration participants, and previously observed the man. He directed questions to the Polish Police and the Ministry of Interior and Administration regarding who ordered the identification of Piotr and on what basis. He warned that if the identification of protesters occurred without legal grounds, it could mean using the state apparatus to control citizens. #Polska #Policja #protesty (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that although they were not "any Albania" before, on that day they could be. He stated that everyone respected the assessments of the Venice Commission except for President Nawrocki, and then he referred to authorities from 2024. https://t.co/lUbhYBG7k8 #Polska #KomisjaWenecka #Autorytety (translated)

"Certainly, he is not a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal. President Karol Nawrocki stated that if Berek did not fulfill the formalities of taking an oath before the head of state, 'he certainly is not a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal.'" #Manifestacja #PrawoiSprawiedliwość #MarszNiepodległości (translated)

Chrzanik wrote that government media misinformed about the knife attack, pointing to reports from PAP and TVP Info about the attacker targeting a policewoman. He also accused Donald Tusk of once again polarizing Poles and linking Nawrocki with aggression and knives. He added that the situation stirred strong indignation in him. #Polska #polityka #dezinformacja (translated)

During the Saturday demonstration in front of the Constitutional Tribunal in Warsaw, Paweł Szefernaker, head of the President's Office, accused Donald Tusk's government of attempting to take over independent state institutions, emphasizing that President Karol Nawrocki will defend the Constitution. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #PawełSzefernaker #KarolNawrocki (translated)

The Chief of the Cabinet of the President of Poland, Paweł Szefernaker, thanked those gathered in front of the Constitutional Tribunal for their presence and courage, stating that they showed how important the Tribunal's matter is for Poland. He reminded that President Karol Nawrocki announced the defense of the Constitution against actions of state bodies and institutions that do not respect it. He added that respecting it also requires citizens' engagement. Szefernaker accused Donald Tusk’s government of destroying the foundations of the Republic and the national community for the past three years and attempting to appropriate state institutions and utilize them in political struggles. He claimed that the government’s aim is not to lower the prices of fuel, electricity, pellets, or coal for the winter, to develop the state, or to build the largest airport in this part of Europe, but to take full control over independent institutions. Referring to Karol Nawrocki's campaign in 2025, Szefernaker stated that his camp won despite attacks from the state apparatus, the withdrawal of campaign funds, and pressure. He added that they could not break their spirit, and their hope was Poland. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Konstytucja #Polska (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that Minister Paweł Szefernaker, head of the Cabinet of the President of Poland Karol Nawrocki, spoke during a demonstration in defense of the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal. Szefernaker conveyed thanks to the participants on behalf of the president and stated that Nawrocki intends to uphold the Constitution. Szefernaker accused Donald Tusk's government of destroying the foundations of the state and attempting to subordinate independent institutions to itself. He cited media reports about a team in the Office of the Prime Minister that had prepared 50 cases for the Tribunal in the event of it being taken over by Tusk's people. He also assessed that after taking over public television and the prosecutor's office, the government may seek to take control of the Tribunal, and subsequently the National Bank of Poland, undermining the president's status. The minister pointed out that during Karol Nawrocki's campaign in 2025, his supporters won despite — as he said — pressure and attacks from the state apparatus. In conclusion, he once again thanked the participants of the demonstration for defending the independence of the Tribunal. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Konstytucja #Polska (translated)

Krzysztof Sałek from KO in Stalowa Wola wrote that the man detained for identification attacked the police officers and tried to escape, and after being caught, he started lamenting. He referred to him as a "hero" of the Republic, PiS, and supporters of Nawrocki and assessed that the narrative about the "innocent protester" failed. He praised the police and wrote that the services are doing their job. https://t.co/06DD3Kwg9r #Policja #Protest #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

They assessed her negatively, among others, Prime Minister Tusk, the head of the Ministry of National Defense, Deputy Prime Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, while President Karol Nawrocki announced on June 19 that he had decided to revoke the Order of the White Eagle from Zelensky. #Ukraina #Polska #wojna (translated)

The author of the entry claimed that a Supreme Court judge, appointed by the neo-KRS and appointed during the presidency of Karol Nawrocki, started a commotion on a train while having 4.3 grams of alcohol in his blood. According to the author, he was detained in Słupsk. He added that he was not surprised by this, as he believed the case involved people from the same environment. https://t.co/b4pLaz00yj https://t.co/dWrDHjahK6 #SądNajwyższy #Polska #neoKRS #PL (translated)